UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrantx

Filed by a Partyparty other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨
Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

xDefinitive Proxy Statement

¨Definitive Additional Materials

¨Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

Apple Inc.

LOGO

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

xNo fee required.

¨
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

¨
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)    Amount Previously Paid:

(2)    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)    Filing Party:

(4)    Date Filed:


LOGO

Apple Inc.

Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of

Shareholders and Proxy Statement


LOGO

Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

1 Infinite Loop

Town Hall (Building 4)

Cupertino, California 95014

February 28, 2017

9:00 a.m. Pacific Time

The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K

are available free of charge atinvestor.apple.com.

Items of Business

(a)To elect to the Board of Directors the following eight nominees presented by the Board: James Bell, Tim Cook, Al Gore, Bob Iger, Andrea Jung, Art Levinson, Ron Sugar, and Sue Wagner;

 

 (1)(b)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:


LOGO

APPLE INC.

1 Infinite Loop

Cupertino, California 95014

NOTICE OF 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

February 28, 2014

9:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time

To the shareholders of Apple Inc.:

Notice is hereby given that the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Apple Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), will be held on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, in Building 4 of the Company’s principal executive offices located at the address shown above for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”):

1.To elect the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Board intends to present for election the following eight nominees: William Campbell, Timothy Cook, Millard Drexler, Al Gore, Robert Iger, Andrea Jung, Arthur Levinson, and Ronald Sugar;

2.To facilitate the implementation of majority voting for the election of directors in an uncontested election by amending the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles”) to eliminate Article VII, which relates to the term of directors and the transition from a classified board of directors to a declassified structure;

3.To amend the Company’s Articles to eliminate the “blank check” authority of the Board to issue preferred stock;

4.To amend the Company’s Articles to establish a par value for the Company’s common stock of $0.00001 per share;

5.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014;2017;

 

 6.(c)

To vote on a non-bindingan advisory resolution to approve executive compensation;

 

 7.(d)

To approvevote on the Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan;frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation;

 

 8.(e)

To consider fivevote on the shareholder proposals set forth in the proxy statement, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

 

 9.(f)

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any postponement(s)postponements or adjournment(s)adjournments thereof.

Only shareholders of record as of the closeRecord Date

Close of business on December 30, 2013 are entitled to receive notice of, to attend, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. To ensure that your vote is counted at the Annual Meeting, however, please vote as promptly as possible.2016

 

Sincerely,

/S/    BRUCE SEWELL        

LOGO

Bruce Sewell

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary

Cupertino, California

January 6, 2017

Cupertino, CaliforniaYour vote is important. Please vote.

January 10, 2014


Table of Contents

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
Proxy Statement Summary1
Frequently Asked Questions6
Directors, Corporate Governance, and Executive Officers13

Directors

13

Biographical Information for Our Director Nominees

14

Corporate Governance

19

Role of the Board of Directors

19

Board Leadership Structure

19

Board Committees

19

Board Oversight of Risk Management

20

Audit Committee Financial Experts

21

Code of Ethics

21

Review, Approval, or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

21

Transactions with Related Persons

22

Attendance of Directors at Annual Meetings of Shareholders

22

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

22

Communications with the Board

23

Compensation of Directors

24

Director Compensation—2016

25

Executive Officers

26
Executive Compensation28

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

28

Executive Compensation Tables

39

Summary Compensation Table—2016, 2015, and 2014

39

Grants of Plan-Based Awards—2016

41

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Year-End

43

Stock Vested—2016

45

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

46
Proposals48

Overview of Proposals

48

Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors

49

Proposal No.  2—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

50

Proposal No.  3—Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

52

Proposal No.  4—Advisory Vote on Frequency of Say-on-Pay Votes

53

Proposal No. 5—Shareholder Proposal

54

Proposal No. 6—Shareholder Proposal

56

Proposal No. 7—Shareholder Proposal

59

Proposal No. 8—Shareholder Proposal

62

Proposal No. 9—Shareholder Proposal

64

Other Matters

66
Audit and Finance Committee Report67
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management68
Equity Compensation Plan Information71
Directions to the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING

TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 28, 2014:Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, Notice of Meeting and


Proxy Statement are available freeSummary

This summary highlights the proposals to be acted upon, as well as financial, compensation, and corporate governance information described in more detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. In addition, this summary provides a brief description of charge at: www.apple.com/investorApple’s values.

In this Proxy Statement, the terms “Apple,” “we,” and “our” refer to Apple Inc. The information contained onapple.com is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

Annual Meeting Proposals

Proposal

Recommendation
of the Board

1.

Election of Directors

FOR each of the nominees

2.

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

FOR

3.

Say-on-Pay

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

FOR

4.

Say-on-Pay Frequency

Advisory Vote on Frequency of Say-on-Pay Votes

1 YEAR

5.

Shareholder Proposal

Charitable Giving - Recipients, Intents and Benefits

AGAINST

6.

Shareholder Proposal

Diversity of Senior Management and the Board

AGAINST

7.

Shareholder Proposal

Shareholder Proxy Access Amendments

AGAINST

8.

Shareholder Proposal

Executive Compensation Reform

AGAINST

9.

Shareholder Proposal

Executives to Retain Significant Stock

AGAINST

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 1


Compensation and Performance Highlights

LOGOFor a detailed discussion of our executive compensation program, please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 28.

2016 Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is designed to be simple, effective, and link pay to performance, while reflecting the size, scope, and success of Apple’s business, as well as the responsibilities of our executive officers.

The elements of our program and highlights from 2016 are as follows:

Base Salary

  The annual base salary for our CEO was $3 million, and the annual base salary for each of our other named executive officers was $1 million.

Annual Cash Incentive

  The cash incentive program for our named executive officers measured net sales and operating income results against threshold, target, and maximum performance goals.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

  The equity awards granted to our named executive officers contain a substantial performance component based on Apple’s total shareholder return relative to the other companies in the S&P 500 over a three-year performance period.

2016 Named Executive Officer Target Pay Mix

LOGO

Tim Cook has not received an equity award since 2011
LOGO

The chart above shows target dollar values for each element of our named executive officers’ 2016 compensation. Annual cash incentives for 2016 paid out at 89.5% of target. For more information, please see the annual cash incentive discussion beginning on page 33.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 2


2016 Financial Performance and Annual Cash Incentive Payouts

APPLE INC.Apple delivered another year of strong financial results in 2016. However, the two financial measures used to evaluate executive performance under our annual cash incentive program, net sales and operating income, declined from ourrecord-breaking 2015 levels. These results were below the target performance goals set by the Compensation Committee. As a result, the annual cash incentive payouts to our named executive officers were below target.

Net Sales

$215.6B

Operating Income

$60.0B

LOGO

LOGO

Long-Term Equity Incentives and Total Shareholder Return

Apple is focused on creating long-term value for our shareholders, and for the three-year period from September 29, 2013 through September 24, 2016, our total shareholder return was 73.6%. Our executive compensation program is weighted considerably toward long-term equity awards. This practice creates a substantial retention incentive, encourages our executive officers to focus on Apple’s long-term success, and aligns with the long-term interests of our shareholders.

2017 Compensation Program Updates

For 2017, we increased the performance-based component of our long-term equity incentives to 50% of the grant date fair value of the award, placing an even greater emphasis on performance-based compensation for our executive officers.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 3


Corporate Governance

Apple believes that effective corporate governance should include regular constructive discussions with our shareholders. We have a proactive engagement process that encourages feedback from our shareholders. This feedback helps shape our governance practices, which include:

A majority voting standard for uncontested elections of directors;

One or more holders entitled to cast at least 10% of votes are permitted to call a special meeting of shareholders;

Adoption of proxy access in 2015, and recently adopted enhancements to our proxy access bylaws to make it easier for shareholders to nominate director candidates;

Changes to the performance-based component of the long-term equity incentives under our 2017 executive compensation program; and

Stock ownership guidelines for our CEO, executive officers, and directors.

Board of Directors and Committees

1 Infinite LoopLOGO  Chair  LOGO  Member               

      

Age as of

Annual Meeting

    

Director Since

(calendar year)

    

Audit

Committee

    

Compensation

Committee

    

Nominating

Committee

James Bell

 

 

    68    2015    LOGO            

Tim Cook

Chief Executive Officer

 

    56    2011               

Al Gore

 

 

    68    2003         LOGO      LOGO  

Bob Iger

 

 

    66    2011         LOGO      LOGO  

Andrea Jung

 

 

    58    2008         LOGO      LOGO  

Art Levinson

Chairman of the Board

 

    66    2000    LOGO            

Ron Sugar

 

 

    68    2010    LOGO            

Sue Wagner

 

 

    55    2014    LOGO          

7.6 Years

Average Tenure

2 New Directors

in Last Three Years

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 4


Apple Values

LOGO

Inclusion and Diversity

apple.com/diversity

Apple believes diversity is more than one gender, race, or ethnicity. lt is the entire human experience.

Our hiring trends over the last three years show steady progress in attracting more women and under-represented minorities.

We achieved pay equity in the United States for similar roles and performance, and we are committed to maintaining pay equity.

LOGO

Accessibility

apple.com/accessibility

Apple believes that technology should be accessible to everyone.

Our products are powerful and affordable assistive devices, with built-in accessibility features such as VoiceOver, SwitchControl, and support for Made for iPhone hearing aids.

We received the 2016 Robert S. Bray Award from the American Council of the Blind for continued accessibility innovation across all of our products.

LOGO

Supplier Responsibility

apple.com/supplier-responsibility

Apple is committed to providing fair and safe working conditions, creating greater opportunities for workers, and transparently reporting on our efforts at every level of the supply chain.

As of December 2016, 100% of smelters/refiners committed to or are participating in third-party assessments for tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold, and cobalt.

We conducted 705 supply chain assessments on labor and human rights, health and safety, and environment in 2016, covering over 1.3 million workers in 30 countries.

LOGO

Education

apple.com/education

Apple believes education is a fundamental human right and that a quality education should be accessible to all.

Our ConnectED program has helped create transformative learning environments in 114 underserved U.S. schools, reaching over 4,000 teachers and 50,000 students.

The Apple Teacher program delivers free professional development for educators, and Everyone Can Code provides free materials to learn, write, and teach code.

LOGO

Privacy and Security

apple.com/privacy

Security is fundamental to the design of all Apple hardware, software, and services.

Apple has been protecting user data for over a decade with SSL and TLS in Safari, File Vault on Mac, and encryption that is built into iOS.

We utilize privacy by design to help create the best user experience and we never sell user data.

LOGO

Environment

apple.com/environment

Apple takes the same innovative approach to the environment as we do with our products.

We use 100% renewable energy in 23 countries, and 93% of the electricity in 2015 for our global operations comes from renewable sources.

In 2015, over 99% of the virgin paper used in our product packaging came from sustainably managed forests or controlled wood sources.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 5


Frequently Asked Questions

2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

When:

February 28, 2017

9:00 a.m. Pacific Time

Admission will begin at 7:30 a.m. Pacific Time

Where:

1 Infinite Loop

Town Hall (Building 4)

Cupertino, California 95014

Record Date:

December 30, 2016

Bring:

  Valid photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport

  Proof of stock ownership as of the Record Date

The use of mobile phones, pagers, recording or photographic equipment, tablets, or computers is not permitted at the Annual Meeting.

General

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

GENERAL INFORMATION

Why am I receiving these materials?

Apple Inc. (the “Company”) has made these materials availableYou are invited to youattend Apple’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and vote on the Internet or, upon your request, has delivered printed versions of these materials toproposals described in this Proxy Statement because you by mail, in connection with the Company’s solicitation ofwere an Apple shareholder on December 30, 2016 (the “Record Date”). Apple is soliciting proxies for use at the 2014 annual meetingAnnual Meeting, including any postponements or adjournments.

Even if you plan on attending the Annual Meeting in person, we encourage you to vote your shares in advance using one of shareholders (the “the methods described in this Proxy Statement to ensure that your vote will be represented at the Annual Meeting”) to be held on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, and at any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof. Meeting.

These materials were first sent or made available to shareholders on January 10, 2014. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”). The Annual Meeting will be held in Building 4 of the Company’s principal executive offices located at the address shown above.6, 2017.

What is included in these proxy materials?

These materials include:

This Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting; and

 

  

The Company’sNotice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

This Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting

Apple’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission24, 2016 (the SEC“Annual Report”) on October 30, 2013 (the “Annual Report”).

If you requested printed versions by mail, these printed proxy materials also include the proxy card or voting instruction form for the Annual Meeting.

What items will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

The Company is aware of 12 items that shareholders may vote on at the Annual Meeting. Eleven items are listed on the Company’s proxy card, including four shareholder proposals (No. 8, No. 9, No. 10, and No. 11) that will only be voted upon if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. One additional shareholder proposal, as described in the next question, also may be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting. The following items are each listed on the Company’s proxy card:

The election to the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the eight nominees named in this Proxy Statement (Proposal No. 1);

The amendment of the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles”) to facilitate the implementation of majority voting for the election of directors in an uncontested election by eliminating Article VII, which relates to the term of directors and the transition from a classified board of directors to a declassified structure (Proposal No. 2);

 

1


The amendment of the Company’s Articles to eliminate the “blank check” authority of the Board to issue preferred stock (Proposal No. 3);

The amendment of the Company’s Articles to establish a par value for the Company’s common stock of $0.00001 per share (Proposal No. 4).

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014 (Proposal No. 5);

A non-binding advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Proposal No. 6);

The approval of the Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan (Proposal No. 7);

A shareholder proposal by John Harrington and Northstar Asset Management Inc. entitled “Board Committee on Human Rights” to amend the Company’s bylaws (Proposal No. 8);

A shareholder proposal by The National Center for Public Policy Research of a non-binding advisory resolution entitled “Report on Company Membership and Involvement with Certain Trade Associations and Business Organizations” (Proposal No. 9);

A shareholder proposal by Carl Icahn of a non-binding advisory resolution that the Company commit to completing not less than $50 billion of share repurchases during its 2014 fiscal year (and increase the authorization under its capital return program accordingly) (Proposal No. 10); and

A shareholder proposal by James McRitchie of a non-binding advisory resolution entitled “Proxy Access for Shareholders” (Proposal No. 11).

Will any other business be conducted at the meeting?

An eligible shareholder has notified us of his intent to propose a resolution at the Annual Meeting that, if approved, would, among other things, ask the Board “to enact a policy to use technical methods and other best practices to protect user data.” This shareholder proposal is referred to as the “Floor Proposal.” The Company knows of no other matters to be submitted to the shareholders at the Annual Meeting, other than the proposals referred to in this| 2017 Proxy Statement and the possible submission of the Floor Proposal.

The Floor Proposal was not submitted under Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the shareholder did not seek to have the Floor Proposal included in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, the Floor Proposal may be presented at the meeting but is not included in this Proxy Statement. If the Floor Proposal is presented at the Annual Meeting, then to the extent permitted by applicable rules, the proxy holders will have, and intend to exercise, discretionary voting authority under Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act to vote AGAINST the Floor Proposal. If any other matters properly come before the shareholders at the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named on the proxy to vote the shares represented thereby on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

The Board recommends that you vote your shares:

“FOR” each of the nominees to the Board (Proposal No. 1);

“FOR” the amendment of the Articles to facilitate the implementation of majority voting for the election of directors in an uncontested election by eliminating Article VII, which relates to the term of directors and the transition from a classified board of directors to a declassified structure (Proposal No. 2);

2| 6


“FOR” the amendment of the Company’s Articles to eliminate the “blank check” authority of the Board to issue preferred stock (Proposal No. 3);

“FOR” the amendment of the Company’s Articles to establish a par value for the Company’s common stock of $0.00001 per share (Proposal No. 4);

“FOR” ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014 (Proposal No. 5);

“FOR” the approval of the non-binding advisory resolution approving the Company’s executive compensation (Proposal No. 6);

“FOR” the approval of the Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan (Proposal No. 7);

“AGAINST” the shareholder proposal by John Harrington and Northstar Asset Management Inc. entitled “Board Committee on Human Rights” to amend the Company’s bylaws (Proposal No. 8);

“AGAINST” the shareholder proposal by The National Center for Public Policy Research of a non-binding advisory resolution entitled “Report on Company Membership and Involvement with Certain Trade Associations and Business Organizations” (Proposal No. 9);

“AGAINST” the shareholder proposal by Carl Icahn of a non-binding advisory resolution that the Company commit to completing not less than $50 billion of share repurchases during its 2014 fiscal year (and increase the authorization under its capital return program accordingly) (Proposal No. 10); and

“AGAINST” the shareholder proposal by James McRitchie of a non-binding advisory resolution entitled “Proxy Access for Shareholders” (Proposal No. 11).

Where are the Company’s principal executive offices located and what is the Company’s main telephone number?

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California 95014. The Company’s main telephone number is (408) 996-1010.

What is the Company’s fiscal year?

The Company’s fiscal year is the 52 or 53-week period that ends on the last Saturday of September. Unless otherwise stated, all information presented in this Proxy Statement is based on the Company’s fiscal calendar.

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internetinternet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, the CompanyApple uses the Internetinternet as the primary means of furnishing proxy materials to shareholders. Accordingly, the Company isWe are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice“Notice of Internet Availability”) to the Company’s shareholders. Allour shareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructionswith instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internetonline or to request a printed copy of the materials.

Shareholders may be foundfollow the instructions in the Notice. In addition, shareholders may requestNotice of Internet Availability to elect to receive future proxy materials in printed formprint by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. The Company encouragesemail. We encourage shareholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internetonline to help reduce the environmental impact of itsour annual meetings, and the cost to the Company associated with the physicalreduce Apple’s printing and mailing of materials.costs.

Apple’s proxy materials are also available atinvestor.apple.com.

3


I share an address with another shareholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How maycan I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?

The CompanyApple has adopted an SEC-approveda procedure called “householding.” Under this procedure, the Company deliversApple may deliver a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if applicable,you requested printed versions by mail, this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to multiple shareholders who share the same address, unless the CompanyApple has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. This procedure reduces the Company’senvironmental impact of our annual meetings, and reduces Apple’s printing and mailing costs, and the environmental impact of its annual meetings.costs. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to be able to access and receive separate proxy cards. Upon written or oral request, the CompanyApple will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if applicable,you requested printed versions by mail, this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to any shareholder at a shared addressthat elects not to which the Company delivered a single copy of any of these documents.participate in householding.

To receive, free of charge, a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if applicable,you requested printed versions by mail, this Proxy Statement or the Annual Report, shareholdersor separate copies of any future notice, proxy statement, or annual report, you may write or call the CompanyApple at the following:following email address, physical address, or phone number:

investor_relations@apple.com

Apple Investor Relations

1 Infinite Loop MS: 301-4IR

Cupertino, California 95014

(408) 974-3123

If you are receiving more than one copy of the proxy materials at a single address and would like to participate in householding, please contact Apple at the email address, physical address, or phone number above. Shareholders who hold shares in “street name” (as described below) may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization to request information about householding.

How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

The Notice will provide you with instructions regarding how to use the Internet to:

View the Company’s proxy materials for the Annual Meeting; and

Instruct the Company to send future proxy materials to you by email.

The Company’s proxy materials are also available at www.apple.com/investor. This website address is included for reference only. The information contained on the Company’s website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

Choosing to receive future proxy materials by email will save the Company the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of the Company’s annual meetings on the environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email message next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?

Each share of the Company’s common stock has one vote on each matter. Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 30, 2013 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to receive notice of, to attend, and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 892,553,950 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding, held by 26,522 holders of record. In addition to shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock, beneficial owners of shares held in street name as of the Record Date can vote using the methods described below.

What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?

Shareholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, LLC (“Computershare”), you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice was sent directly to you by the Company.

4


Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name,” and a Notice was forwarded to you by that organization. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct your broker, bank, trustee, or nominee how to vote your shares.

If I am a shareholder of record of the Company’s shares, how do I vote?

If you are a shareholder of record, there are four ways to vote:

In person. You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting by requesting a ballot from an usher when you arrive. You must bring valid picture identification such as a driver’s license or passport and may be requested to provide proof of stock ownership as of the Record Date.

Via the Internet. You may vote by proxy via the Internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice.

By Telephone. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote by proxy by calling the toll free number found on the proxy card.

By Mail. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a proxy card and you may vote by proxy by filling out the proxy card and returning it in the envelope provided.

If I am a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, how do I vote?

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, there are four ways to vote:

In person. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a “legal proxy” from the organization that holds your shares. A legal proxy is a written document that will authorize you to vote your shares held in street name at the Annual Meeting. Please contact the organization that holds your shares for instructions regarding obtaining a legal proxy.

You must bring a copy of the legal proxy to the Annual Meeting and ask for a ballot from an usher when you arrive. You must also bring valid picture identification such as a driver’s license or passport. In order for your vote to be counted, you must hand both the copy of the legal proxy and your completed ballot to an usher to be provided to the inspector of election.

Via the Internet. You may vote by proxy via the Internet by visiting www.proxyvote.com and entering the control number found in your Notice. The availability of Internet voting may depend on the voting process of the organization that holds your shares.

By Telephone. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote by proxy by calling the toll free number found on the voting instruction form. The availability of telephone voting may depend on the voting process of the organization that holds your shares.

By Mail. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a voting instruction form and you may vote by proxy by filling out the voting instruction form and returning it in the envelope provided.

5


What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

AHolders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy for the transaction of business. This is called a quorum. Your shares will be counted for purposes of determining if there is a quorum if you:if:

 

Are

You are entitled to vote and you are present in person at the Annual Meeting; or

You have properly voted by proxy online, by phone or by submitting a proxy card or voting instruction form by mail.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 7


Broker non-votes and youabstentions are present in person at the Annual Meeting; or

Have properly voted by proxy on the Internet, by telephone or by submittingcounted for purposes of determining whether a proxy card or voting instruction form by mail.

quorum is present. If a quorum is not present, we may propose to adjourn the Annual Meeting to solicit additional proxies.proxies and reconvene the Annual Meeting at a later date.

Who will serve as the inspector of election?

A representative from Apple’s transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“Computershare”), will serve as the inspector of election.

Who is paying the costs of this proxy solicitation?

Apple is paying the costs of the solicitation of proxies. Apple has retained Georgeson LLC to assist in the distribution of proxy materials and the solicitation of proxies from brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, and other similar organizations representing beneficial owners of shares for the Annual Meeting. We have agreed to pay Georgeson a fee of approximately $15,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses. You may contact Georgeson at (866) 828-4304.

Apple must also pay brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers, and other similar organizations representing beneficial owners certain fees associated with:

Forwarding the Notice of Internet Availability to beneficial owners;

Forwarding printed proxy materials by mail to beneficial owners who specifically request them; and

Obtaining beneficial owners’ voting instructions.

In addition to solicitations by mail, the proxy solicitor and Apple’s directors, officers, and employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies on Apple’s behalf in person, by phone, or by electronic communication.

Where are Apple’s principal executive offices located and what is Apple’s main phone number?

Apple’s principal executive offices are located at 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California 95014. Apple’s main phone number is (408) 996-1010.

What is Apple’s fiscal year?

Apple’s fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period that ends on the last Saturday of September. Unless otherwise stated, all information presented in this Proxy Statement is based on Apple’s fiscal calendar.

Voting

Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?

Each share of Apple’s common stock has one vote on each matter. Only “shareholders of record” as of the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 5,257,816,000 shares of Apple’s common stock issued and outstanding, held by 26,000 shareholders of record. In addition to shareholders of record of Apple’s common stock, “beneficial owners of shares held in street name” as of the Record Date can vote using the methods described below.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 8


What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “beneficial owner of shares held in street name”?

Shareholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with Computershare, you are the shareholder of record with respect to those shares.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the “beneficial owner of shares held in street name.” As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct your broker, bank, trustee, or nominee how to vote your shares. Most individual shareholders are beneficial owners of shares held in street name.

If I am a shareholder of record, how do I vote?

If you are a shareholder of record, there are four ways to vote:

In Person. You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting by requesting a ballot from an usher when you arrive.

Online. You may vote by proxy by visitinginvestorvote.com/AAPL and following the instructions provided in the Notice of Internet Availability.

Phone. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a proxy card and you may vote by proxy by calling the toll free number found on the proxy card.

Mail. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a proxy card and you may vote by proxy by filling out the proxy card and returning it in the envelope provided.

Even if you plan on attending the Annual Meeting in person, we encourage you to vote your shares in advance online, by phone, or by mail to ensure that your vote will be represented at the Annual Meeting.

If I am a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, how do I vote?

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, there are four ways to vote:

In Person. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a “legal proxy” from the organization that holds your shares. A legal proxy is a written document that authorizes you to vote your shares held in street name at the Annual Meeting. Please contact the organization that holds your shares for instructions regarding obtaining a legal proxy.

You must bring a copy of the legal proxy to the Annual Meeting and ask for a ballot from an usher when you arrive. In order for your vote to be counted, you must hand both the copy of the legal proxy and your completed ballot to an usher to be provided to the inspector of election.

Online. You may vote by proxy by visitingproxyvote.com and entering the control number found in your Notice of Internet Availability. The availability of online voting may depend on the voting process of the organization that holds your shares.

Phone. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a voting instruction form and you may vote by proxy by calling the toll free number found on the voting instruction form. The availability of phone voting may depend on the voting process of the organization that holds your shares.

Mail. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a voting instruction form and you may vote by proxy by filling out the voting instruction form and returning it in the envelope provided.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 9


How are proxies voted?

All shares represented by valid proxies received prior to the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting will be voted and, where a shareholder specifies by means of the proxy a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the shares will be voted in accordance with the shareholder’s instructions.

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting.

In Person. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. However, your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you properly vote at the Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering a written notice of revocation prior to the Annual Meeting to Apple’s Secretary at 1 Infinite Loop, MS: 301-4GC, Cupertino, California 95014.

Online. You may change your vote using the online voting method described above, in which case only your latest internet proxy submitted prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted.

Phone. You may change your vote using the phone voting method described above, in which case only your latest telephone proxy submitted prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted.

Mail. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote by signing and returning a new proxy card or voting instruction form dated as of a later date, in which case only your latest proxy card or voting instruction form received prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted.

What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?

Shareholders of Record.Record. If you are a shareholder of record and you:

 

Indicate when voting on the Internet or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board; or

Indicate when voting online or by phone that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board; or

 

Sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions,

Sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions,

then the persons named as proxy holders, Peter OppenheimerLuca Maestri and Bruce Sewell, will vote your shares in the manner recommended by the Board on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement and as the proxy holdersthey may determine in their discretionbest judgment with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting, including the Floor Proposal.Meeting.

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name.Name. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not provide the organization that holds your shares with specific voting instructions, then under applicable rules, the organization that holds your shares may generally vote your shares in their discretion on “routine” matters, but cannot vote on “non-routine” matters.

Which proposals are considered “routine” or “non-routine”?

The following proposal is considered a routine matter:

The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017 (Proposal No. 2).

A broker or other nominee may generally vote in their discretion on routine matters, and therefore no broker non-votes are expected in connection with Proposal No. 2.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 10


The following proposals are considered non-routine matters:

Election of directors (Proposal No. 1);

Advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Proposal No. 3);

Advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 4); and

Each of shareholder proposals No. 5 through No. 9.

If the organization that holds your shares does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, that organization will inform the inspector of election that it does not have the authority to vote on thisthe matter with respect to your shares. This is generally referred to as a “broker non-vote.”

Which ballot measures are considered “routine” or “non-routine”?

The election of directors (Proposal No. 1), the other proposals for the amendment of the Company’s Articles (Proposal No. 2, and No. 3), the non-binding advisory resolution approving the Company’s executive compensation (Proposal No. 6), the proposal to approve the Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan (Proposal No. 7), and the five shareholder proposals (Proposals No. 8, No. 9, No. 10, No. 11, and the Floor Proposal) are considered non-routine matters under applicable rules. A broker or other nominee cannot vote without instructions on non-routine matters, and therefore Therefore, broker non-votes may exist in connection with Proposal No. 1 and Proposals No. 13 through No. 3, Proposals No. 6 through No. 11, and the Floor Proposal.9.

The proposal to amend the Company’s Articles to establish a par value for the Company’s common stock of $0.00001 per share (Proposal No. 4) and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014 (Proposal No. 5) are each considered routine matters under applicable rules. A broker or other nominee may generally vote on routine matters, and therefore no broker non-votes are expected to exist in connection with Proposals No. 4 and No. 5.

6


What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?

With respect to the election of directors (Proposal No. 1), the Company announced at the 2012 annual meeting of shareholdersApple’s bylaws provide that, the Board had unanimously adopted a policy providing for majority voting in an uncontested elections of directors. An “uncontested election of directors” means an election of directors, in which, at the expiration of the time fixed pursuant to the Company’s bylaws requiring advance notice of director candidates, the number of candidates for election does not exceed the number of directors to be elected by the shareholders at that election. Therefore, although the Company’s bylaws currently provide for plurality voting (where the candidates receiving the highest number of affirmative votes are elected), the Board’s majority voting policy will apply to the election taking place at the Annual Meeting.

Under plurality voting, the eight nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes would be elected as directors to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. However, pursuant to the Board’s majority voting policy, any nominee for election who does not receive the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute a quorum is required to elect a director. An “uncontested election of directors” means an election of directors in which the quorum will promptly submit his or her irrevocable offernumber of resignationcandidates for election does not exceed the number of directors to be elected by the Secretaryshareholders at that election.

Approval of the Company in writing, subject only to the Board’s acceptance of that offer of resignation in accordance with the Board’s policies and procedures.

Amending the Company’s Articles (Proposals No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4) and amending the Company’s bylaws (Proposal No. 8) each require the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares. If Proposal No. 2, is approved, then the Board will separately amend the Company’s bylaws at the meeting of the Board immediately following the Annual Meeting to adopt the majority voting standard in an uncontested election of directors set forth in California Corporations Code Section 708.5,Proposal No. 3, and that standard will apply to future uncontested elections of directors.

Approval of Proposals No. 5 through No. 7, No. 9 through No. 11, and the Floor Proposal requires, in each case, the affirmative vote of both (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute thea quorum.

A plurality of the votes cast for Proposal No. 4 will be considered the shareholders’ preferred frequency for holding an advisory vote on executive compensation.

How are broker non-votes and abstentions treated?

Broker non-votes and abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. Only “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes are counted for purposes of determining the votes received in connection with each proposal.

With respect toproposal (or, in the electioncase of directors (ProposalProposal No. 1), under plurality voting, broker4, votes for “1 Year,” “2 Years,” and “3 Years”). Broker non-votes and abstentions wouldwill have no effect on determining whether the nominees elected. However, under the majority voting policy adopted by the Company and described above, broker non-votes and abstentions, which have the same effect as “against” votes, could cause a nominee to fail to obtain the required affirmative vote of (i)constitutes a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii)(or, in the case of Proposal No. 4, whether the vote for “1 Year,” “2 Years,” or “3 Years” constitutes a plurality of the shares voted on the proposal).

In addition, for each proposal other than Proposal No. 4, the affirmative vote equal to a majority of the shares requirednecessary to constitute the quorum.

With respect to the proposals to amend the Company’s Articles (Proposals No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4) and the Company’s bylaws (Proposal No. 8),a quorum is also required for approval. Therefore, broker non-votes and abstentions could prevent the proposal from receiving the required affirmative voteelection of a majority ofdirector or the Company’s outstanding shares.

With respect to each of the other proposals, broker non-votes and abstentions could prevent the proposal from receiving the required affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute the quorum.

In order to minimize the number of broker non-votes, the Company encourages you to vote or to provide voting instructions with respect to each proposal to the organization that holds your shares by carefully following the instructions provided in the Notice or voting instruction form.

7


Can I change my vote after I have voted?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting. Prior to the applicable cutoff time, you may change your vote using the Internet or telephone methods described above, in which case only your latest Internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted. You may also revoke your proxy and change your vote by signing and returning a new proxy card or voting instruction form dated asapproval of a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. However, your attendance at the Annual Meeting willproposal because they do not automatically revoke your proxy unless you properly vote at the Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Secretary at 1 Infinite Loop, MS: 301-4GC, Cupertino, California 95014 prior to the Annual Meeting.count as affirmative votes.

Who will serve as the inspector of election?

A representative from Computershare will serve as the inspector of election.

Is my vote confidential?

Proxy instructions, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your voteApple will not be disclosed either withindisclose the Companyproxy instructions or to third parties,ballots of individual shareholders, except:

 

As necessary to meet applicable legal requirements;

To allow for the tabulation and certification of votes;

 

To allow for the tabulation and certification of votes; and

To facilitate a successful proxy solicitation;

 

To assert claims for Apple;

To facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

To defend claims against Apple; and

Occasionally, shareholders provide written

As necessary to meet applicable legal requirements.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 11


If you write comments on theiryour proxy cards, whichcard or ballot, the proxy card or ballot may be forwarded to the Company’sApple’s management and the Board.Board to review your comments.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be tallied by the inspector of election after the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting. The CompanyApple will publish the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K which the Company is required to filefiled with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within four business days following the Annual Meeting.

Who is paying the costs of this proxy solicitation?

The Company is paying the costs of the solicitation of proxies. The Company has retained Georgeson Inc. to assist in obtaining proxies by mail, facsimile or email from brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers or other similar organizations representing beneficial owners of sharesDirector Nominations and Other Matters for the Annual Meeting. We have agreed to a fee of approximately $40,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses. Georgeson Inc. may be contacted at (866) 828-4304.

The Company must also pay brokerage firms, banks, broker-dealers or other similar organizations representing beneficial owners of shares held in street name certain fees associated with:

Forwarding the Notice to beneficial owners;

Forwarding printed proxy materials by mail to beneficial owners who specifically request them; and

Obtaining beneficial owners’ voting instructions.

8


In addition, certain of the Company’s directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies on the Company’s behalf in person, by telephone, or by electronic communication.

How can I attend the Annual Meeting?

Only shareholders as of the Record Date are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting. Admission will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Admission will begin at 7:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time on the date of the2018 Annual Meeting and each shareholder must present valid picture identification such as a driver’s license or passport and, if asked, provide proof of stock ownership as of the Record Date. The use of mobile phones, pagers, recording or photographic equipment, tablets and/or computers is not permitted at the Annual Meeting.Shareholders

What is the deadline to propose actionsmatters for consideration or to nominate individuals to serve as directors atinclusion in the 2015proxy materials for the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders?

Requirements for Shareholder Proposals to Be Considered for Inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Materials. Proposals that a shareholder intends to present at the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders and wishes to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2015 annual meeting of shareholdersThe proposal must be received no later thanon or prior to September 12, 2014.8, 2017. All proposals must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act which lists the requirements for the inclusion of shareholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. Shareholder proposals must be delivered to the Company’s Secretary by mail at 1 Infinite Loop, MS: 301-4GC, Cupertino, California 95014, or by email at shareholderproposal@apple.com.1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

RequirementsWhat is the deadline to propose matters for Other Shareholder Proposals to Be Brought Before the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Director Nominations. Notice of any proposal that a shareholder intends to presentconsideration at the 20152018 annual meeting of shareholders, but does not intend to have includedfor inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders, as well as any director nominations,materials?

The proposal must be delivered to the Company’s Secretary by mail at 1 Infinite Loop, MS: 301-4GC, Cupertino, California 95014, or by email at shareholderproposal@apple.com,received not earlier than the close of business on October 31, 20142017 and not later than the close of business on November 30, 2014.2017. The noticeproposal must be submitted by a shareholder of record and must set forth the information required by the Company’s bylaws with respect to each director nomination or other proposal that the shareholder intends to present at the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders.Apple’s bylaws. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you can contact the organization that holds your shares for information about how to register your shares directly in your name as a shareholder of record.

What is the deadline to nominate individuals for election as directors at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders using proxy access?

A shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, that has owned continuously for at least three years shares of Apple stock representing an aggregate of at least 3% of our outstanding shares, may nominate and include in Apple’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to 20% of Apple’s Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements in Apple’s bylaws. Notice of proxy access director nominees must be received not earlier than the close of business on August 9, 2017 and not later than the close of business on September 8, 2017.

What is the deadline to nominate individuals for election as directors at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders, but not included in the proxy materials?

Director nominations that a shareholder intends to present at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders, but does not intend to have included in Apple’s proxy materials, must be received not earlier than the close of business on October 31, 2017 and not later than the close of business on November 30, 2017. Notice of director nominations must be submitted by a shareholder of record and must set forth the information required by Apple’s bylaws. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you can contact the organization that holds your shares for information about how to register your shares directly in your name as a shareholder of record.

Where do I send proposals and director nominations for the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders?

Proposals and director nominations must be sent either by mail to Apple’s Secretary at 1 Infinite Loop, MS: 301-4GC, Cupertino, California 95014, or by email toshareholderproposal@apple.com.

 

9Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 12


DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEDirectors, Corporate Governance, and Executive Officers

Directors

Listed below are the Company’s eight directors. TheApple’s Board has nominated eachconsists of the Company’s directors for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve a one-year term. At the Annual Meeting, proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of individuals than the eight nominees named in this Proxy Statement. Each of the directors listed below has consented to serving as a nominee, being named in this proxy statement, and to serving if elected.

The Board comprises a diverse group of leaders in their respective fields. ManyMost of our directors have senior leadership experience at major domestic and multinational companies. In these positions, they have also gained significant and diverse management experience, including strategic and financial planning, public company financial reporting, compliance, risk management and leadership development. Many directorsThey also have experience serving as executive officers, or on boards of directors and board committees, of other public companies, and have an understanding of corporate governance practices and trends. OtherIn addition, many of our directors have experience as directors or trustees of significant academic, research, nonprofit, and philanthropic institutions, and bring unique perspectives to the Board.

The Board and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the Nominating Committee“Nominating Committee”) believe the skills, qualities, attributes, and experience of theour directors provide the CompanyApple with business acumen and a diverse range of perspectives to engage each other and management to address effectively the Company’sApple’s evolving needs and represent the best interests of the Company’sApple’s shareholders. The biographies below describe the skills, qualities, attributes and experience of the nominees that led the Board and the Nominating Committee to determine that it is appropriate to nominate these directors.

Name

  

Position With the Company

  Age as of
the Annual
Meeting
   Director
Since
 

William Campbell

  Director   73     1997  

Timothy Cook

  Director and Chief Executive Officer   53     2011  

Millard Drexler

  Director   69     1999  

Al Gore

  Director   65     2003  

Robert Iger

  Director   63     2011  

Andrea Jung

  Director   55     2008  

Arthur Levinson

  Chairman of the Board   63     2000  

Ronald Sugar

  Director   65     2010  

William Campbellhas been Chairman of Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”) since August 1998 and was Chief Executive Officer and director of Intuit from 1994 until August 1998. Mr. Campbell has also been a director of GSV Capital Corp. since October 2012, and is Chair of the Board of Trustees of Columbia University and a director of The National Football Foundation & College Hall of Fame, Inc. Among other qualifications, Mr. Campbell brings to the Board executive leadership experience, including his service as a Chairman of a public company, together with extensive financial expertise and technological and industry experience.

Timothy Cook has been the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) since August 2011 and was previously the Company’s Chief Operating Officer since October 2005. Mr. Cook joined the Company in March 1998 and served as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Operations from 2002 to 2005. In 2004, his responsibilities were expanded to include the Company’s Macintosh hardware engineering. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Cook served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations, Sales, Service and Support. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Cook served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations. Mr. Cook has served as a director of NIKE, Inc. since November 2005, where he has served on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee since September 2011 and on the Compensation Committee since November 2005, including as Chair of the

10


Compensation Committee since September 2011. He is also a director of The National Football Foundation & College Hall of Fame, Inc. Mr. Cook brings to the Board extensive executive leadership experience in the technology industry, including the management of worldwide operations, sales, service and support.

Millard Drexlerhas been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of J.Crew Group, Inc. (“J.Crew”) since January 2003. Previously, Mr. Drexler was President and Chief Executive Officer of The Gap, Inc. (“The Gap”) from 1995 to September 2002, having previously served as President from 1987. Mr. Drexler also was a director of The Gap from November 1983 to October 2002. Mr. Drexler has served on the board of Warby Parker since September 2013 and on the board of Teach for America, Inc. since October 2011. Among other qualifications, Mr. Drexler brings to the Board executive leadership experience, including his service as a chief executive officer of a public company, along with extensive brand marketing experience.

Al Gore has served as Chairman of Generation Investment Management since 2004, and a partner of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers since 2007. Mr. Gore also is Chairman of The Climate Reality Project and previously served as Executive Chairman of Current TV from 2002 to 2013. Mr. Gore was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives four times, to the U.S. Senate two times, and served two terms as Vice President of the United States. Among other qualifications, Mr. Gore brings to the Board executive leadership experience, a valuable and different perspective due to his extensive background in politics, government and environmental rights, along with experience in asset management and venture capital.

Robert Iger has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”) since March 2012, having previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer from October 2005, as President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2000 to October 2005, and as President of Walt Disney International and Chairman of the ABC Group from 1999 to January 2000. Prior to that, from 1974 to 1998, Mr. Iger held a series of positions with increasing responsibility at ABC, Inc. and its predecessor Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. Mr. Iger is a member of the board of directors of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum, the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, and the U.S.-China Business Council. Since June 2010, Mr. Iger has also served on the President’s Export Council. Among other qualifications, Mr. Iger brings to the Board executive leadership experience, including his service as a chief executive officer of a public company, along with extensive financial expertise and experience in international exports and brand marketing.

Andrea Jung is a senior advisor to the board of directors of Avon Products, Inc. (“Avon”), having previously served as Executive Chairman from April 2012 to December 2012, and as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Avon from September 2001 to April 2012. Prior to that, Ms. Jung had served as Chief Executive Officer of Avon since November 1999 and served as a member of the board of directors of Avon since January 1998. Ms. Jung has served as a member of the Supervisory Board of Daimler AG since April 2013 and has also been a director of General Electric Company since 1998, where she serves on the Management Development and Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Science and Technology Committee. She also is a member of the New York Presbyterian Hospital Board of Trustees. Among other qualifications, Ms. Jung brings to the Board executive leadership experience, including her service as a chief executive officer of a public multinational company, along with extensive brand marketing and consumer products experience.

Arthur Levinson has been Chairman of Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”) since September 1999, and a member of the Roche Holding Ltd. board of directors since March 2010. Dr. Levinson previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Genentech from July 1995 to April 2009. Dr. Levinson has also served as a director of F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd since March 2010, where he serves on the Remuneration Committee, and in September 2013, was named the Chief Executive Officer of Calico LLC, a company focused on health, aging and well-being. Dr. Levinson is also Chairman of the Board of Amyris, Inc., and a director of NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., and the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT. Dr. Levinson also serves on the Board of Scientific Consultants of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, on the Industrial Advisory Board of the California Institute for Quantitative Biomedical Research, on the Advisory Council for the Princeton University Department of Molecular Biology, and on the Advisory Council for the Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics. From

11


May 2009 to September 2013, Dr. Levinson served as an advisor to Genentech’s Research and Early Development center, and as a member of Genentech’s external advisory group, the Scientific Resource Board. Dr. Levinson previously served as a director of Google Inc. from April 2004 until October 2009. Among other qualifications, Dr. Levinson brings to the Board executive leadership experience, including his service as a chairman of a public company, along with extensive financial expertise and brand marketing experience.

Ronald Sugaris the retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation (“Northrop Grumman”). Dr. Sugar was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Northrop Grumman from 2003 until 2010 and President and Chief Operating Officer from 2001 until 2003. He was President and Chief Operating Officer of Litton Industries, Inc. from 2000 until the company was acquired by Northrop Grumman in 2001. He was earlier Chief Financial Officer of TRW Inc. Dr. Sugar has also been a director of Air Lease Corporation since 2010, of Amgen Inc. since July 2010, and of Chevron Corporation since April 2005. Dr. Sugar is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, trustee of the University of Southern California, director of the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association and national trustee of the Boys and Girls Clubs of America. Among other qualifications, Dr. Sugar brings to the Board executive leadership experience as a chairman and chief executive officer of a major public company, financial expertise as a former chief financial officer, understanding of advanced technology, and a global business perspective from his service on other boards.

Role of the Board; Corporate Governance Matters

The Board oversees the Company’s CEO and other senior management in the competent and ethical operation of the Company and assures that the long-term interests of the shareholders are being served. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are available at www.apple.com/investor.

The Board met a total of seven times during 2013. The Board has determined that all Board members, other than Mr. Cook, are independent under applicable rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) and the SEC.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board believes its current leadership structure best serves the objectives of the Board’s oversight of management, the Board’s ability to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of the shareholders, and the Company’s overall corporate governance. The Board also believes the current separation of the Chairman and CEO roles allows the CEO to focus his time and energy on operating and managing the Company and leverages the Chairman’s experience and perspectives. The Board periodically reviews the leadership structure and may make changes in the future.

Board Committees

The Board has a standing Audit and Finance Committee (the “Audit Committee”), Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee. The Board has determined that the Chairs and all committee members are independent under applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules for committee memberships. The members of the committees are shown in the table below.

Director

Audit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Nominating
Committee

William Campbell

MemberChair

Timothy Cook

Millard Drexler

MemberMember

Al Gore

MemberMember

Robert Iger

Member

Andrea Jung

Chair

Arthur Levinson

Member

Ronald Sugar

Chair

12


The Audit Committee is responsible primarily for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility of reviewing the financial information provided to shareholders and others, appointing the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit department, evaluating the Company’s accounting policies and the system of internal controls established by management and the Board, reviewing significant financial transactions, and overseeing enterprise risk management. The Audit Committee met a total of ten times during 2013.

The Compensation Committee is responsible primarily for reviewing the compensation arrangements for the Company’s executive officers, including the CEO, administering the Company’s equity compensation plans, and reviewing the Board’s compensation. The Compensation Committee’s authority to grant equity awards may not be delegated to the Company’s management or others. For a description of the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures, including the roles of the Company’s executive officers and independent compensation consultants in the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. The Compensation Committee met a total of eight times during 2013.

The Nominating Committee assists theconsiders candidates for director who are recommended by its members, by other Board members, by shareholders, and by management, as well as those identified by a third-party search firm retained to assist in identifying qualified individuals to become directors, makes recommendations to the Board concerning the size, structure and composition of the Board and its committees, monitors the process to assess the Board’s effectiveness and is primarily responsible for oversight of corporate governance, including implementing the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.evaluating possible candidates. In evaluating potential nominees to the Board, the Nominating Committee considers, among other things, independence, character, ability to exercise sound judgment, diversity, age, demonstrated leadership, skills, including financial literacy, and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Nominating Committee is committed to actively seeking out highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool from which Board nominees are chosen. The Nominating Committee considers candidates proposedrecommended by shareholders and evaluates them using the same criteria as for other candidates recommended by its members, other members of the Board, or other persons.

In addition, in 2015, the Board adopted amendments to our bylaws to implement proxy access. A shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, owning continuously for at least three years shares of Apple stock representing an aggregate of at least 3% of our outstanding shares, may nominate and include in Apple’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to 20% of Apple’s Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements in the bylaws. In December 2016, the Board adopted additional amendments to our bylaws to enhance our proxy access framework and make it easier for shareholders to nominate proxy access candidates. For example:

Apple no longer requires shareholders who nominate a proxy access candidate to recall loaned shares and hold them through the annual meeting. Ownership of loaned shares is deemed to continue if the shareholder(s) has the power to recall the loaned shares on five business days’ notice.

Apple increased the availability of proxy access by limiting the circumstances under which the maximum number of proxy access candidates is reduced. For example, Apple no longer reduces the number of proxy access candidates when an incumbent director was nominated through proxy access in the last two years and is subsequently supported by the Board for re-election.

Shareholders may now re-nominate a proxy access candidate regardless of the level of support received at the annual meeting.

Apple has extended the deadline by which nominating shareholders and proxy access candidates must provide certain information to Apple to ten business days from five business days.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 13


Apple has narrowed the scope of a nominating shareholder’s indemnification obligations to legal and regulatory violations arising out of a nominating shareholder’s actions or communications with Apple shareholders or out of information provided by a nominating shareholder to Apple.

Apple has limited the discretion of the Board to unilaterally interpret the proxy access provisions.

Biographical Information for Our Director Nominees

The biographies below describe the skills, qualities, attributes, and experience of the nominees that led the Board and the Nominating Committee metto determine that it is appropriate to nominate these directors. Each of the eight nominees currently serves on the Board. In this section (“Directors, Corporate Governance, and Executive Officers—Directors”), references to particular years refer to the calendar year.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 14


LOGO

Art Levinson

66 years old

Director since 2000

Chairman of the Board

Audit Committee

Art Levinson has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Calico, a totalcompany focused on health, aging, and well-being, since September 2013.

Dr. Levinson previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Genentech, Inc., a medical drug developer, from July 1995 to April 2009, and served as Genentech’s Chairman from September 1999 to September 2014.

Among other qualifications, Dr. Levinson brings to the Board executive leadership experience, including his service as a chairman and chief executive officer of a large international public company, along with extensive financial expertise and brand marketing experience.

Former Public Company Directorships

Within the Last Five Years

Amyris, Inc.

F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.

Selected Directorships and Memberships

Board of Directors, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT

Board of Scientific Consultants, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Industrial Advisory Board, California Institute for Quantitative Biomedical Research

Advisory Council for the Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics

Advisory Council for the Princeton University Department of Molecular Biology

LOGO

Tim Cook

56 years old

Director since 2011

Chief Executive Officer

Tim Cook has been Apple’s Chief Executive Officer since August 2011 and was previously Apple’s Chief Operating Officer since October 2005.

Mr. Cook joined Apple in March 1998 and served as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Operations from 2002 to 2005. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Cook served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations, Sales, Service and Support. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Cook served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations.

Among other qualifications, Mr. Cook brings to the Board extensive executive leadership experience in the technology industry, including the management of worldwide operations, sales, service, and support.

Other Current Public Company Directorships

NIKE, Inc.

Selected Directorships and Memberships

Board of Directors, The National Football Foundation & College Hall of Fame, Inc.

Board of Trustees, Duke University

Board of Directors, Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 15


LOGO

James Bell

68 years old

Director since 2015

Audit Committee

James Bell is the retired Executive Vice President, Corporate President and Chief Financial Officer of The Boeing Company, an aerospace company.

Mr. Bell served as Boeing’s CFO from 2008 to 2012, having previously served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, from 2003 to 2008, and as Senior Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller from 2000 to 2003. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Bell held a series of positions with increasing responsibility at Boeing.

Among other qualifications, Mr. Bell brings to the Board financial and accounting expertise as a former chief financial officer of a large international public company, experience in strategic planning and leadership of complex organizations, and a global business perspective from his service on other boards.

Other Current Public Company Directorships

The Dow Chemical Company

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

CDW Corporation

Selected Directorships and Memberships

Board of Trustees, Rush University Medical Center

LOGO

Al Gore

68 years old

Director since 2003

Compensation Committee

Nominating Committee

Al Gore has served as Chairman of Generation Investment Management, an investment management firm, since 2004, and as a partner of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture capital firm, since 2007.

Mr. Gore is also Chairman of The Climate Reality Project.

Mr. Gore was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives four times, to the U.S. Senate two times, and served two terms as Vice President of the United States.

Among other qualifications, Mr. Gore brings to the Board executive leadership experience, a valuable and different perspective due to his extensive background in digital communication and technology policy, politics, and environmental rights, along with experience in asset management and venture capital.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 16


LOGO

Bob Iger

66 years old

Director since 2011

Compensation Committee

Nominating Committee Chair

Bob Iger has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Walt Disney Company, a diversified media company, since March 2012.

Prior to that time, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Disney since October 2005, having previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2000 and as President of Walt Disney International and Chairman of the ABC Group from 1999 to 2000. From 1974 to 1998, Mr. Iger held a series of positions with increasing responsibility at ABC, Inc. and its predecessor Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.

Among other qualifications, Mr. Iger brings to the Board executive leadership experience, including his service as a chairman and chief executive officer of a large international public company, along with extensive financial expertise and experience in international business and brand marketing.

Other Current Public Company Directorships

The Walt Disney Company

Selected Directorships and Memberships

Board of Directors, National September 11 Memorial & Museum

Vice Chairman, U.S.-China Business Council

Co-Chairman, Partnership for a New American Economy

Member, American Academy of Arts & Sciences

Member, President’s Export Council

Board of Directors, Bloomberg Philanthropies

LOGO

Andrea Jung

58 years old

Director since 2008

Compensation Committee Chair

Nominating Committee

Andrea Jung has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Grameen America LLC, a nonprofit microfinance organization, since April 2014, where she also serves on the Board of Directors.

Ms. Jung previously served as Executive Chairman of Avon Products, Inc., a personal care products company, from April 2012 to December 2012, and as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Avon from September 2001 to April 2012. Ms. Jung served as Chief Executive Officer of Avon from November 1999 to April 2012, and served as a member of the Board of Directors of Avon from January 1998 to December 2012.

Among other qualifications, Ms. Jung brings to the Board executive leadership experience, including her service as a chairman and chief executive officer of a large international public company, along with extensive brand marketing and consumer products experience.

Other Current Public Company Directorships

Daimler AG

General Electric Company

Former Public Company Directorships

Within the Last Five Years

Avon Products, Inc.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 17


LOGO

Ron Sugar

68 years old

Director since 2010

Audit Committee Chair

Ron Sugar is the retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global security company. Dr. Sugar served in this role from 2003 to 2010 and served as President and Chief Operating Officer from 2001 to 2003. Previous to Northrop Grumman, he held executive positions at Litton Industries and TRW Inc., where he served as Chief Financial Officer.

Dr. Sugar is a senior advisor to various businesses and organizations, including Ares Management, LLC, Bain & Company, Temasek Americas Advisory Panel, the G100 Network, and the World 50.

Among other qualifications, Dr. Sugar brings to the Board executive leadership experience as a chairman and chief executive officer of a large international public company, financial expertise as a former chief financial officer, understanding of advanced technology, and a global business perspective from his service on other boards.

Other Current Public Company Directorships

Air Lease Corporation

Amgen Inc.

Chevron Corporation

Selected Directorships and Memberships

Member, National Academy of Engineering

Board of Trustees, University of Southern California

Board of Directors, Los Angeles Philharmonic Association

Board of Trustees, Boys and Girls Clubs of America

LOGO

Sue Wagner

55 years old

Director since 2014

Audit Committee

Sue Wagner is a co-founder of BlackRock, Inc., an asset management company. Ms. Wagner served as BlackRock’s Vice Chairman from January 2006 to July 2012, and also served as a member of BlackRock’s Global Executive Committee and Global Operating Committee. During her tenure at BlackRock, Ms. Wagner served as BlackRock’s Chief Operating Officer and Head of Corporate Strategy, and led the alternative investments and international client businesses.

Among other qualifications, Ms. Wagner brings to the Board operational experience, including her service as chief operating officer of a large international public company, along with extensive financial expertise and experience in the financial services industry.

Other Current Public Company Directorships

BlackRock, Inc.

Swiss Re

Selected Directorships and Memberships

Board of Directors, Color Genomics, Inc.

Board of Trustees, Wellesley College

Board of Trustees, Hackley School

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 18


Corporate Governance

Role of the Board of Directors

Apple’s Board oversees the CEO and other senior management in the competent and ethical operation of Apple on a day-to-day basis and assures that the long-term interests of shareholders are being served. To satisfy the Board’s duties, directors are expected to take a proactive, focused approach to their positions, and set standards to ensure that Apple is committed to business success through the maintenance of high standards of responsibility and ethics.

Apple’s key governance documents, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines and committee charters, are available atinvestor.apple.com/corporate-governance.cfm. The governance structure is designed to foster principled actions, informed and effective decision-making, and appropriate monitoring of both compliance and performance. The Board met four times during 20132016, and after the end of the fiscal year, recommended to the full Board each of the current nominees for election to the Board.

The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee operate under written charters adopted by the Board. These charters are available at www.apple.com/investor.

During 2013, each member of the Board attended or participated in 75% or more of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board (heldheld during the period for which such person has been a director)2016, and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committeeseach committee of the Board on which such person served (duringduring 2016.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board believes its current leadership structure best serves the periodsobjectives of the Board’s oversight of management, the Board’s ability to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of Apple’s shareholders, and Apple’s overall corporate governance. The Board also believes the separation of the Chairman and CEO roles allows the CEO to focus his time and energy on operating and managing Apple and leverages the Chairman’s experience and perspectives. The Board periodically reviews the leadership structure to determine whether it continues to best serve Apple and its shareholders.

Board Committees

The Board has a standing Audit and Finance Committee (the “Audit Committee”), Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee. The Board has determined that such person served)the Chairs of each committee and all committee members are independent under applicable rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”), the New York Stock Exchange LLC (“NYSE”), and the SEC for committee memberships. Each Committee operates under written charters adopted by the Board that are available atinvestor.apple.com/corporate-governance.cfm.

There are no family relationships amongAudit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Company’sBoard in oversight and monitoring of:

Apple’s financial statements and other financial information provided by Apple to its shareholders and others;

Compliance with legal, regulatory, and public disclosure requirements;

The independent auditors, including their qualifications and independence;

Apple’s system of internal controls, including the internal audit function;

Treasury and finance matters;

Enterprise risk management, privacy, and data security; and

The auditing, accounting, and financial reporting process generally.

The Audit Committee also appoints Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm and reviews the services performed by the firm. The Audit Committee met nine times during 2016.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 19


Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the compensation arrangements for Apple’s executive officers, including the CEO, administers Apple’s equity compensation plans, and directors.reviews the Board’s compensation. The Compensation Committee’s authority to grant equity awards may not be delegated to Apple’s management or others. For a description of the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures, including the roles of the independent compensation consultant and Apple’s executive officers in support of the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, see the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below. The Compensation Committee met seven times during 2016.

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee assists the Board in identifying qualified individuals to become directors, makes recommendations to the Board concerning the size, structure, and composition of the Board and its committees, monitors the process to assess the Board’s effectiveness, and oversees and makes recommendations regarding corporate governance matters, including implementing Apple’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nominating Committee met four times during 2016.

The Nominating Committee has recommended to the full Board each of the nominees named in this Proxy Statement for election to the Board.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

The Board believes that evaluating how the executive team managesteam’s management of the various risks confronting the CompanyApple is one of its most important areas of oversight. In carrying out this critical responsibility, the Board has designated the Audit Committee with primary responsibility for overseeing enterprise risk management. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with regard to risks inherent in the Company’s business, including the identification, assessment, management, and monitoring of those risks, and risk management decisions, practices and activities of the Company, the Audit Committee is assisted by a Risk Oversight Committee consisting of key members of management, including the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel. The Risk Oversight Committee reports regularly to the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee makes periodic reports to the Board. See the Audit Committee’s Charter at www.apple.com/investor for more information about its risk oversight function.

13


In accordance with this responsibility, the Audit Committee monitors the Company’s majorApple’s significant business risks, including financial, operational, privacy, data security, business continuity, legal and regulatory, and reputational exposures, and reviews the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. With respect to privacy and data security, the Audit Committee’s oversight includes, among other things, (i) review of regularCommittee reviews reports from the Company’sApple’s Vice President of Corporate Information Security, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, Director of Global Privacy,and Vice President of Internal Audit, and other members of the Risk Oversight Committee, which includeincluding updates on the Company’srisk management, Apple’s privacy program, and relevant legislative, regulatory, and technical developments;developments.

The Audit Committee is assisted by a Risk Oversight Committee consisting of key members of management, including Apple’s Chief Financial Officer and (ii) review of management’s report on the results of the Company’s annual privacy assessment. As with other matters,General Counsel. The Risk Oversight Committee reports regularly to the Audit Committee, which reports regularly discusses these topics withto the full Board.

While the Audit Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing enterprise risk management, each of the other Board committees also considers riskconsider risks within its areatheir areas of responsibility.responsibility and apprise the Board of significant risks and management’s response to those risks. For example, the Nominating Committee reviews legal and regulatory compliance risks as they relate to corporate governance structure and processes, and the Compensation Committee reviews risks related to compensation matters. The committee chairs periodically apprise the Board of significant risks and management’s response to those risks. While the Board and its committees oversee risk management strategy, management is responsible for implementing and supervising day-to-day risk management processes and reporting to the Board and its committees on such matters.

In establishing and reviewing the Company’sApple’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considers whether the program encourages unnecessary or excessive risk-taking and has concluded that it does not. Executives’ base salaries are fixed in amount and thus do not encourage risk-taking. BonusesAnnual cash incentives are capped and payouts are formulaic and tied to overall corporatespecific company financial performance and also are a relatively small percentage of executive officers’ total compensation opportunities.metrics. The majority of compensation provided to the executive officers is in the form of long-termtime-based and performance-based equity awards that vest over several years and help further align executives’ interests with those of the Company’sApple’s shareholders. The Compensation Committee believes that these awards do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking because the ultimate value of the awards is tied to the Company’sApple’s stock price

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 20


performance over several years and because awards are staggered and subject to long-termregular vesting schedules to help ensure that a significant component of executive compensation is tied to long-term stock price performance.shareholder value creation.

The Compensation Committee has also reviewed the Company’sApple’s compensation programs for employees generally and has concluded these programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.Apple. The Compensation Committee believes that the Company’sApple’s annual cash and long-term equity awards provide an effective and appropriate mix of incentives to help ensure the Company’sApple’s performance is focused on long-term shareholder value creation and do not encourage short-term risk taking at the expense of long-term results. In general, bonus opportunities for Company employees are capped, and the Company has discretion to reduce bonus payments (or pay no bonus) based on individual performance and any other factors it may determine to be appropriate in the circumstances. As with the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, a substantial portion of the compensation for employees generally is delivered in the form of equity awards that help further align the interests of employees with those of shareholders.

Audit Committee Financial Experts

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under applicable SEC rules and also meets the additional criteria for independence of audit committee members set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(l)(1) under the Exchange Act.

Code of Ethics

The CompanyApple has a code of ethics, “Business Conduct: The way we do business worldwide,” that applies to all employees, including the Company’sApple’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, as well as to the Board.Board, and to independent contractors, consultants, and others who do business with Apple. The code is available at www.apple.com/investor. The Companyinvestor.apple.com/corporate-governance.cfm. Apple intends to disclose any changes in this code or waivers from this code that apply to Apple’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or principal accounting officer by posting such information on itsthe same website or by filing with the SEC a Current Report on Form 8-K.8-K, in each case if such disclosure is required by rules of the SEC or NASDAQ.

Review, Approval, or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The Board has adopted a written policy for approval of transactions between Apple and its directors, director nominees, executive officers, greater than 5% beneficial owners, and each of their respective immediate family members, where the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or is expected to exceed $120,000 in a single calendar year and the party to the transaction has or will have a direct or indirect interest. A copy of this policy is available atinvestor.apple.com/corporate-governance.cfm. The policy provides that the Audit Committee reviews transactions subject to the policy and determines whether or not to approve or ratify those transactions. In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to pre-approve or ratify transactions under certain circumstances. In reviewing transactions subject to the policy, the Audit Committee, or the Chair of the Audit Committee, as applicable, considers among other factors it deems appropriate:

The related person’s interest in the transaction;

The approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction;

The approximate dollar value of the amount of the related person’s interest in the transaction without regard to the amount of any profit or loss;

Whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of business of Apple;

Whether the transaction with the related person is proposed to be, or was, entered into on terms no less favorable to Apple than terms that could have been reached with an unrelated third-party;

The purpose of, and the potential benefits to Apple of, the transaction;

Required public disclosure, if any; and

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 21


Any other information regarding the transaction or the related person in the context of the proposed transaction that would be material to investors in light of the circumstances of the particular transaction.

The Audit Committee has considered and adopted the following standing pre-approvals under the policy for transactions with related persons:

Employment as an executive officer of Apple, if the related compensation is approved (or recommended to the Board for approval) by the Compensation Committee;

Any compensation paid to a director if the compensation is consistent with Apple’s director compensation policies and is required to be reported in Apple’s proxy statement under Item 402 of SEC Regulation S-K;

Any transaction with another company at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or director) or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s equity, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million, or 2% of that company’s total annual revenue;

Any charitable contribution, grant, or endowment by Apple to a charitable organization, foundation, or university at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or director), if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million, or 2% of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts; and

Any transaction where the related person’s interest arises solely from the ownership of Apple’s common stock and all holders of Apple’s common stock received the same benefit on a pro-rata basis, such as dividends.

A summary of new transactions covered by the standing pre-approvals, or approved or ratified by the Chair of the Audit Committee, if any, is provided to the Audit Committee for its review at each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting.

Transactions with Related Persons

Mr. Iger is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Disney. In the ordinary course of business, Apple enters into commercial dealings with Disney that we consider arms-length, including sales arrangements, Internet Services content licensing agreements, and similar arrangements. Apple does not believe that Mr. Iger has a material direct or indirect interest in any of such commercial dealings.

The Board has determined that all Board members, other than Mr. Cook, are independent under applicable NASDAQ, NYSE, and SEC rules. In making these determinations, the Board considered the types and amounts of the commercial dealings between Apple and the companies and organizations with which the directors are affiliated.

Attendance of Directors at Annual Meetings of Shareholders

Apple expects all of its directors to attend the Annual Meeting. All of Apple’s directors who were standing for re-election in 2016 attended the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders with the exception of Mr. Bell who was unable to attend for personal reasons.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Ms. Jung, Mr. Gore, Mr. Iger, and Dr. Levinson were members of the Compensation Committee during 2016. Mr. Iger was appointed to the Compensation Committee in place of Dr. Levinson in December 2015. None of the members of the Compensation Committee is or has been an executive officer of Apple, nor did any of them have any relationships requiring disclosure by Apple under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K. None of Apple’s executive officers served as a director or a member of a compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, an executive officer of which served as a director of Apple or member of the Compensation Committee during 2016.

 

14Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 22


Communications with the Board

Any matter intended for the Board, or for any individual member of the Board, should be directed to Apple’s Secretary at 1 Infinite Loop, MS: 301-4GC, Cupertino, California 95014, with a request to forward the communication to the intended recipient. In general, any shareholder communication delivered to Apple for forwarding to Board members will be forwarded in accordance with the shareholder’s instructions. However, Apple reserves the right not to forward to Board members any abusive, threatening, or otherwise inappropriate materials. Information regarding the submission of comments or complaints relating to Apple’s accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters is available atinvestor.apple.com/corporate-governance.cfm.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 23


Compensation of Directors

Members of the Board who are not also Apple employees (“Non-Employee Directors”) receive compensation for their service. Mr. Cook, our CEO, does not receive any compensation for his service as a member of the Board. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the total compensation of our Non-Employee Directors and each element of our Non-Employee Director compensation program. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee evaluates market data provided by its independent compensation consulting firm, Pay Governance LLC, and makes a recommendation to the Board. The Board determines the form and amount of director compensation after its review of recommendations made byreviewing the Compensation Committee.Committee’s recommendation.

Cash Retainers. Non-Employee Directors receive an annual cash retainer of $100,000. In 2016, the Chairman of the Board, Dr. Levinson, received an additional cash retainer of $200,000; the Chair of the Audit Committee, Dr. Sugar, received an additional cash retainer of $35,000; the Chair of the Compensation Committee, Ms. Jung, received an additional cash retainer of $30,000; and the Chair of the Nominating Committee, Mr. Iger, received an additional cash retainer of $25,000. All retainers are paid in quarterly installments.

Equity-Based Awards. A substantial portion of each director’sNon-Employee Director’s annual retainer is in the form of equity. Under the Company’sApple’s 1997 Director Stock Plan (the Director Plan“Director Plan”), members of the Board who are not also Company employees (“Non-Employee Directors”) are granted restricted stock units (“RSUsRSUs”) on the date of theeach annual meeting of shareholders (each, an Annual RSU Award“Annual Director Award”). TheAll Annual Director Awards vest on February 1 of the following year, subject to continued service on the Board through the vesting date. For 2016, the number of RSUs subject to each Annual RSUDirector Award iswas determined by dividing $250,000 by the per-shareper share closing price of the Company’sApple’s common stock on the date of grant (roundedand rounding to the nearest whole share). All Annual RSU Awards to directors will vest on February 1 of the year following the year in which the award is granted, subject to continued service on the Board.share.

A Non-Employee Director who is newly appointed to the Board other than in connection with an annual meeting of shareholders will generally also receive a grant of RSUs upon appointment (an Initial RSU Award“Initial Director Award”), except that a Non-Employee Director who joins the Board after February 1 of a particular year and prior to the annual meeting for that year will not receive an Initial RSUDirector Award. The number of RSUs subject to each Initial RSUDirector Award is determined in the same manner as described above for Annual RSUDirector Awards, but the grant-dategrant date fair value of the award is proratedpro-rated based on the portion of the year that has passed since the last annual meeting. Initial RSUDirector Awards willare scheduled to vest on the vesting date established fornext February 1 following the Annual RSU Awards made at the last annual meeting prior to the date on which the Non-Employee Director joined the Board.award.

Non-Employee Directors do not have the right to vote or dispose of the RSUs subject to these awards. If the CompanyApple pays an ordinary cash dividend on its common stock, each RSU award granted under the Director Plan will be credited with an amount equal to the per-shareper share cash dividend paid by the Company,Apple, multiplied by the total number of RSUs subject to the award that are outstanding immediately prior to the record date for such dividend. The amounts that are credited to each award are referred to as “dividend equivalents.” Any dividend equivalents credited to an award granted under the Director Plan will be subject to the same vesting, payment, and other terms and conditions as the unvested RSUs to which the dividend equivalents relate. The crediting of dividend equivalents is meant to treat the RSU award holders consistently with shareholders.

Non-Employee Directors receive a $50,000 annual retainer. The Chairman ofEquipment Program. Apple has an equipment program for the Board Dr. Levinson, receives an additional annual retainerunder which each Non-Employee Director is eligible to receive, upon request and free of $200,000; the Chair of the Audit Committee, Dr. Sugar, receives an additional retainer of $25,000; the Chair of the Compensation Committee, Ms. Jung, receives an additional annual retainer of $20,000; and the Chair of the Nominating Committee, Mr. Campbell, receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000. All retainers are paid in quarterly installments. Other than the additional annual retainers paid to the Chaircharge, one of each committeenew product introduced by Apple, and the Chairman of the Board, directorsis eligible to purchase additional equipment at a discount.

Non-Employee Directors do not receive any additionalother compensation for serving as Chairon any committee or member of any committee.attending Board or committee meetings.

In February 2013, the Company adoptedStock Ownership Guidelines. Apple has stock ownership guidelines applicable to the Company’sfor our CEO, executive officers, and Non-Employee Directors. Under the guidelines, Non-Employee Directors are expected to own shares of CompanyApple common stock that have a value equal to five times their annual cash retainer for serving as a director. Shares may be owned directly by the individual, or owned jointly with or separately by the individual’s spouse, or held in trust for the benefit of the individual, the individual’s

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 24


spouse or children. Each individualNon-Employee Director is expectedrequired to satisfy the stock ownership guideline applicable to them by November 12, 2017, or within five years after first becoming subject to the guidelines. Each ofOther than Mr. Bell, who joined the Company’s directorsBoard in October 2015, each Non-Employee Director has already satisfied the stock ownership guidelines.

In addition, under the Company’s Board of Directors Equipment Program, each Non-Employee Director is eligible to receive, upon request and free of charge, one of each new product introduced by the Company, and is eligible to purchase additional equipment at a discount.

15


Director Compensation—20132016

The following table shows information regarding the compensation earned or paid during 20132016 to Non-Employee Directors who served on the Board during the year. The compensation paid to Mr. Cook is shown under “Executive Compensation” in the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table—2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011”2014” and the related explanatory tables. Mr. Cook does not receive any compensation for his service as a member of the Board.

 

Name

 Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(2)
  Total
($)
 

William Campbell

  65,000    249,848    823    315,671  

Millard Drexler

  50,000    249,848    5,969    305,817  

Al Gore

  50,000    249,848    3,918    303,766  

Robert Iger

  50,000    249,848    5,341    305,189  

Andrea Jung

  70,000    249,848    6,444    326,292  

Arthur Levinson

  250,000    249,848    8,365    508,213  

Ronald Sugar

  75,000    249,848    1,984    326,832  
Name    

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

($)

     

Stock Awards

($)(1)

     

All Other

Compensation

($)(2)

     

Total

($)

 
James Bell(3)     100,000       360,375       5,176       465,551  
Al Gore     100,000       250,028       2,464       352,492  
Bob Iger     125,000       250,028       2,261       377,289  
Andrea Jung     130,000       250,028       2,163       382,191  
Art Levinson     300,000       250,028       2,351       552,379  
Ron Sugar     135,000       250,028       5,494       390,522  
Sue Wagner     100,000       250,028       1,647       351,675  

 

(1)

In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted to Non-Employee Directors during 2013,2016, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB Topic 718ASC 718”). The grant date fair value for RSUs is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company’sApple’s common stock on the date of grant. For a description of the assumptions and methodologies used to calculate the amounts in the table, seeSee Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies found in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Annual Report in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements in the Annual Report.

The following table shows the number of shares subject to outstanding and unexercised option awards and the number of shares subject to outstanding RSUs held by each of the Non-Employee Directors as of September 28, 2013.

Director

  Number of Shares
Subject to Outstanding
Options as of 9/28/13
   Number of Shares
Subject to Outstanding
RSUs as of 9/28/13
 

William Campbell

   45,589     562  

Millard Drexler

   0     562  

Al Gore

   39,397     562  

Robert Iger

   0     562  

Andrea Jung

   21,370     562  

Arthur Levinson

   75,342     562  

Ronald Sugar

   0     562  

All Non-Employee Directors received an automatic grant of 562 RSUs on February 27, 2013, and the grant date fair value for each grant was $249,848.

 

Each Non-Employee Director received an automatic Annual Director Award of 2,580 RSUs on February 26, 2016, and the grant date fair value for each grant was $250,028. Mr. Bell also received an automatic Initial Director Award of 1,007 RSUs on October 1, 2015, upon joining the Board. The Initial Director Award to Mr. Bell had a grant date fair value of $110,347, resulting in a total grant date fair value of RSUs to Mr. Bell during 2016 of $360,375.

As of September 24, 2016, each Non-Employee Director held 2,580 shares subject to outstanding RSUs. In addition, Mr. Gore had 275,779 shares subject to outstanding and unexercised options, Ms. Jung had 109,590 shares subject to outstanding and unexercised options, and Mr. Levinson had 247,394 shares subject to outstanding and unexercised options.

(2)

The amounts shown reflect one or more products made availablereceived under the Company’sApple’s Board of Directors Equipment Program.equipment program.

Communications with the Board

Any matter intended for the Board, or for any individual member or members of the Board, should be directed to the Company’s Secretary at 1 Infinite Loop, MS: 301-4GC, Cupertino, California 95014, with a request to forward the communication to the intended recipient or recipients. In general, any shareholder communication delivered to the Company for forwarding to the Board or specified Board member or members
(3)

Mr. Bell joined the Board on October 1, 2015.

 

16Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 25


will be forwarded in accordance with the shareholder’s instructions. However, the Company reserves the right not to forward to Board members any abusive, threatening or otherwise inappropriate materials. Information regarding the submission of comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters is available at www.apple.com/investor.

Attendance of Directors at 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The Company expects all of its directors to attend its annual meetings of shareholders. All of the Company’s directors attended the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Mr. Drexler, Mr. Gore, and Ms. Jung were the members of the Compensation Committee during 2013. None of the members of the Compensation Committee is or has been an executive officer of the Company, and no director who served on the Compensation Committee during 2013 had any relationships requiring disclosure by the Company under the SEC’s rules requiring disclosure of certain relationships and related-party transactions. None of the Company’s executive officers served as a director or a member of a compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, the executive officers of which served as a director of the Company or member of the Compensation Committee during 2013.

Executive Officers

The following sets forthBiographical information regardingfor Apple’s executive officers, of the Company.other than Mr. Cook, is listed below. Biographical information pertaining tofor Mr. Cook, who is both a director and an executive officer, of the Company, maycan be found in the section entitled “Directors.” In this section (“Directors, Corporate Governance, and Executive Officers—Executive Officers”), references to particular years refer to the calendar year.

NameAngela Ahrendts, Senior Vice President, Retail, 56, joined Apple and assumed her current position in May 2014. Prior to joining Apple, Ms. Ahrendts served as director and Chief Executive Officer of Burberry plc, a luxury fashion company, from July 2006. Ms. Ahrendts also previously served as Executive Vice President at Liz Claiborne Inc., and as President of Donna Karan International. Ms. Ahrendts is also a member of the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council.

Position with the Company

Age as of
the Annual
Meeting

Eduardo Cue

Senior Vice President, Internet Software and Services49

Craig Federighi

Senior Vice President, Software Engineering44

Peter Oppenheimer

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer51

Daniel Riccio

Senior Vice President, Hardware Engineering51

Philip Schiller

Senior Vice President, Worldwide Marketing53

Bruce Sewell

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary55

Jeffrey Williams

Senior Vice President, Operations50

EduardoEddy Cue,, Senior Vice President, Internet Software and Services, 52, joined the CompanyApple in January 1989 and assumed his current position in September 2011. Mr. Cue has held variousCue’s previous positions with the Company, includingApple include Vice President of Internet Services and Senior Director of iTunes Operations. Mr. Cue has also served as a director of Ferrari S.p.A., a luxury sports car company, since November 2012.

Craig Federighi,, Senior Vice President, Software Engineering, 47, rejoined the CompanyApple in April 2009 and assumed his current position in August 2012. Prior to rejoining the Company,Apple, Mr. Federighi held several roles at Ariba, Inc. (“Ariba”), an enterprise software company, including Chief Technology Officer and Vice President of Internet Services. Prior to Ariba,that, Mr. Federighi worked at NeXT and at the CompanyApple upon the acquisition of NeXT. Mr. Federighi has also served the Company asFederighi’s previous positions with Apple include Vice President of Mac OS Engineering and Director of Engineering.

Peter Oppenheimer,Luca Maestri, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, 53, joined the CompanyApple in July 1996March 2013 and assumed his current position in June 2004.May 2014. Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. Oppenheimer alsoMaestri served the Company as Apple’s Vice President and Corporate Controller and as Senior Director of Finance for the Americas.Controller. Prior to joining the Company,Apple, Mr. OppenheimerMaestri was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Xerox Corporation, a business services and technology company, from February 2011 to February 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Maestri was Chief Financial Officer at Nokia Siemens Networks from October 2008 to February 2011, and he previously had a 20-year career with General Motors Corporation, where he served as Chief Financial Officer of oneGM Europe and GM Brazil, and held several executive positions with General Motors Corporation in Europe and Asia Pacific. Mr. Maestri served as a director of the four business units for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (“ADP”). PriorThe Principal Financial Group from February 2012 to joining ADP, Mr. Oppenheimer spent six years in the Information Technology Consulting Practice with Coopers and Lybrand.May 2015.

17


DanielDan Riccio,, Senior Vice President, Hardware Engineering, 54, joined the CompanyApple in June 1998 and assumed his current position in August 2012. Mr. Riccio also served the Company asRiccio’s previous positions with Apple include Vice President of Product Design and in 2010 was named Vice President of iPad Hardware Engineering. Prior to joining the Company,Apple, Mr. Riccio worked at Compaq Computer Corporation as Senior Manager of Mechanical Engineering.

PhilipPhil Schiller,, Senior Vice President, Worldwide Marketing, 56, rejoined the CompanyApple in April 1997 and assumed his current position in February 2002. Prior to rejoining the Company,Apple, Mr. Schiller was Vice President of Product Marketing at Macromedia, Inc. from December 1995 to March 1997 and Director of Product Marketing at FirePower Systems, Inc. from 1993 to December 1995. Prior to that, Mr. Schiller spent six years at the CompanyApple in various marketing positions. Mr. Schiller has also served as a director of Illumina, Inc., a genetics company, since July 2016.

Bruce Sewell,, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, 58, joined the CompanyApple and assumed his current position in September 2009. Prior to joining the Company, heApple, Mr. Sewell served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel of Intel Corporation (“Intel”) from 2005. Mr. Sewell also served as Intel’s Vice President, General Counsel from 2004 to 2005 and Vice President of Legal and Government Affairs, Deputy General Counsel from 2001 to 2004. Prior to joining Intel in 1995, Mr. Sewell was a partner in the law firm of Brown and Bain PC. Mr. Sewell has also served as a director of Vail Resorts Management Company, an operator of mountain resorts, since January 2013.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 26


Jeffrey Williams,Johny Srouji, Senior Vice President, Operations,Hardware Technologies, 52, joined the CompanyApple in 2008 and assumed his current position in December 2015. Mr. Srouji’s previous positions with Apple include Vice President, Hardware Technologies, and Vice President, VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration). Prior to joining Apple, Mr. Srouji worked in various engineering roles at IBM and Intel.

Jeff Williams, Chief Operating Officer, 53, joined Apple in June 1998 and assumed his current position in July 2010.December 2015. Mr. Williams also served the Company asWilliams’s previous positions with Apple include Senior Vice President, Operations; Head of Worldwide ProcurementProcurement; and Vice President of Operations. Prior to joining the Company,Apple, Mr. Williams worked in a number of operations and engineering roles at IBM from 1985 to 1998.

 

18Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 27


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows certain information as of December 26, 2013 (the “Table Date”), unless otherwise indicated, with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by: (i) each person the Company believes beneficially holds more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock based solely on the Company’s review of SEC filings; (ii) each director and nominee; (iii) each named executive officer listed in the table entitled “SummaryExecutive Compensation Table—2013, 2012, and 2011” under the section entitled “Executive Compensation”; and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. As of the Table Date, 892,551,186 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued and outstanding. Unless otherwise indicated, all persons named as beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock have sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, the address for each person named below is c/o Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California 95014.

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned(1)
  Percent of
Common Stock
Outstanding
 

BlackRock, Inc.

   49,807,372(2)   5.58

William Campbell

   48,112(3)       

Timothy Cook

   87,316(4)       

Eduardo Cue

   3,120(5)       

Millard Drexler

   1,533(6)       

Al Gore

   101,920(7)       

Robert Iger

   5,616(8)       

Andrea Jung

   22,980(9)       

Arthur Levinson

   240,040(10)       

Peter Oppenheimer

   4,834(11)       

Daniel Riccio

   12,258(12)       

Ronald Sugar

   1,718(13)       

Jeffrey Williams

   317(14)       

All current executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons)

   567,949(15)       

(1)Represents shares of the Company’s common stock held and options held that were exercisable at the Table Date or within 60 days thereafter. Does not include RSUs that vest more than 60 days after the Table Date. RSUs are awards granted by the Company and payable, subject to vesting requirements, in shares of the Company’s common stock.

(2)Based on a Schedule 13G filed February 8, 2013 by BlackRock, Inc. In such filing, BlackRock, Inc. lists its address as 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022.

(3)Includes 45,589 shares of the Company’s common stock that Mr. Campbell has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 562 RSUs vesting on February 1, 2014.

(4)Represents 87,316 shares of the Company’s common stock held in the name of Mr. Cook’s Trust and excludes 965,000 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Cook.

(5)Represents 3,120 shares of the Company’s common stock held in the name of Mr. Cue’s Trust and excludes 200,000 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Cue.

(6)Includes 562 RSUs held by Mr. Drexler vesting on February 1, 2014.

(7)Includes 39,397 shares of the Company’s common stock that Mr. Gore has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 562 RSUs vesting on February 1, 2014.

(8)Includes 75 shares of the Company’s common stock held by Mr. Iger’s spouse, and 562 RSUs vesting on February 1, 2014.

19


(9)Includes 21,370 shares of the Company’s common stock that Ms. Jung has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 562 RSUs vesting on February 1, 2014.

(10)Includes 2,000 shares of the Company’s common stock held by Dr. Levinson’s spouse, 75,342 shares of the Company’s common stock that Dr. Levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 562 RSUs vesting on February 1, 2014.

(11)Excludes 175,000 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Oppenheimer.

(12)Excludes 63,750 additional unvested RSUs held by Mr. Riccio.

(13)Includes 562 RSUs held by Dr. Sugar vesting on February 1, 2014.

(14)Excludes 175,000 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Williams.

(15)Includes 181,698 shares of the Company’s common stock that executive officers and directors have the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 3,934 RSUs vesting within 60 days after the Table Date. Excludes 2,006,250 unvested RSUs held by executive officers.

*Represents less than 1% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock as of the Table Date.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders also are required by SEC rules to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company and any written representations that no Forms 5 were required, the Company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were timely met during 2013.

REVIEW, APPROVAL OR RATIFICATION OF TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

The Board has adopted a written policy for approval of transactions between the Company and its directors, director nominees, executive officers, greater than five percent beneficial owners and their respective immediate family members, where the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or is expected to exceed $120,000 in a single calendar year and the party to the transaction has or will have a direct or indirect interest. A copy of this policy is available at www.apple.com/investor.

The policy provides that the Audit Committee reviews transactions subject to the policy and determines whether or not to approve or ratify those transactions. In doing so, the Audit Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate:

 

The related person’s interest in the transaction;

The approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction;

The approximate dollar value of the amount of the related person’s interest in the transaction without regard to the amount of any profit or loss;

Whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of business of the Company;

20


Whether the transaction with the related person is proposed to be, or was, entered into on terms no less favorable to the Company than terms that could have been reached with an unrelated third party;

The purpose of, and the potential benefits to the Company of, the transaction;

Required public disclosure, if any; and

Any other information regarding the transaction or the related person in the context of the proposed transaction that would be material to investors in light of the circumstances of the particular transaction.

In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to pre-approve or ratify transactions. A summary of any new transactions pre-approved or ratified by the Chair is provided to the Audit Committee for its review in connection with its next scheduled meeting.

The Audit Committee has considered and adopted standing pre-approvals under the policy for limited transactions with related persons. Pre-approved transactions include:

Employment as an executive officer, if the related compensation is approved (or recommended to the Board for approval) by the Compensation Committee;

Any compensation paid to a director if the compensation is consistent with the Company’s director compensation policies and is required to be reported in the Company’s proxy statement under Item 402 of SEC Regulation S-K;

Any transaction with another company at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or director) or beneficial owner of less than ten percent of that company’s equity, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1,000,000, or two percent of that company’s total annual revenue;

Any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by the Company to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or director), if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1,000,000, or two percent of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts; and

Any transaction where the related person’s interest arises solely from the ownership of the Company’s common stock and all holders of the Company’s common stock received the same benefit on a pro rata basis, such as dividends.

A summary of new transactions covered by the standing pre-approvals, if any, is provided to the Audit Committee for its review at each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting.

Transactions with Related Persons

The Company enters into commercial dealings with Disney, J.Crew, and Avon that it considers arms-length, including sales arrangements and, in the case of Disney, iTunes Store content licensing agreements and similar arrangements. The Company enters into these commercial dealings in the ordinary course of its business. Mr. Iger is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Disney. Mr. Drexler is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of J.Crew. Ms. Jung is a senior advisor to Avon and was, during the fiscal year, Executive Chairman of Avon. The Company does not believe that Mr. Drexler, Mr. Iger, or Ms. Jung has a material direct or indirect interest in any of such commercial dealings.

The Board has determined that all Board members, excluding Mr. Cook, are independent under the applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules. In making these determinations, the Board considered the types and amounts of the commercial dealings between the Company and the companies and organizations with which the directors are affiliated.

21


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee Report

The following report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to otherwise be considered “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

The Compensation Committee consists of three members: Messrs. Drexler and Gore and Ms. Jung. All members are independent directors under the Nasdaq and SEC compensation committee structure and membership requirements. The Compensation Committee has duties and powers as described in its written charter adopted by the Board. A copy of the charter can be found on the Company’s website at www.apple.com/investor.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures contained in the following section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting.

Members of the Compensation Committee

Andrea Jung (Chair) | Al Gore | Bob Iger

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Apple had another year of strong financial results in 2016. Net sales were $215.6 billion and operating income was $60.0 billion. Net sales of our Services business grew 22% year-over-year and App Store revenue was the highest ever. The compensation paid to our named executive officers for 2016 appropriately reflects and rewards this performance.

In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we discuss the 2016 compensation program for our named executive officers and the guiding principles and practices upon which it is based. Our named executive officers for 2016 were:

 

Millard S. Drexler

Tim Cook
  Al Gore

Chief Executive Officer

Luca Maestri  Andrea Jung (Chair)

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Angela Ahrendts

Senior Vice President, Retail

Eddy Cue

Senior Vice President, Internet Software and Services

Dan Riccio

Senior Vice President, Hardware Engineering

Bruce Sewell

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Mr. Cue, Mr. Riccio, and Mr. Sewell had the same total compensation according to SEC reporting rules, and as a result, we are reporting six named executive officers for 2016.

Guiding Principles and Compensation Discussion and AnalysisPractices

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company’s goal for itsOur executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, and retain a talented, entrepreneurial, and creative team of executives who will provide leadership for the Company’sApple’s success in dynamic and competitive markets. The Company seeks to accomplish this goal inWe have a way that rewards performance and is aligned with its shareholders’ long-term interests.pay-for-performance philosophy for executive compensation based on the following principles:

The Company’s namedTeam-Based Approach. Our executive officers for 2013 were:

Timothy Cook

Chief Executive Officer

Peter Oppenheimer

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Eduardo Cue

Senior Vice President, Internet Softwareare expected to operate as a high-performing team, and accordingly, we apply a team-based approach to our executive compensation program with internal pay equity as a primary consideration. We believe that generally awarding the same base salary, annual cash incentive, and Services

Daniel Riccio

Senior Vice President, Hardware Engineering

Jeffrey Williams

Senior Vice President, Operations

The compensation for the named executive officers currently consists of three elements—long-term equity awards in the formto each of RSU awards, annual performance-based cash bonuses, and base salaries—that are designed to reward performance in a simple and straightforward manner. The compensation program has been weighted in recent years toward long-term equity awards granted approximately every two fiscal years, rather than toward cash compensation, in order to maximize retention and ensure that a significant portion of the named executive officers’ compensation is tied to the Company’s long-term stock price performance. The Company is in the process of designing future awards forour executive officers, other than the CEO, successfully supports this goal.

Performance Expectations. We have clear performance expectations of our executive team, and it is committed to including performance criteria in a portionthe design of the equity awards it grants to executive officers in the future. At Mr. Cook’s request, the Compensation Committee began this initiative in 2013 by amending his August 2011 RSU award to include performance-based vesting conditions.

22


None of the named executive officers has any type of employment agreement or severance arrangement with the Company. In addition, the Company has no long-term cash compensation program or supplemental retirement plan. The Company does not provide tax reimbursements to the named executive officers, nor does it provide perquisites or change in control benefits to its officers that are not available to employees generally.

The Company believes the compensation program for the named executive officers is instrumental in helping the Company achieve its strong financial performance. In 2013, the Company had $170.9 billion in revenue and $49.0 billion in operating income. The Company’s strong earnings and operational performance helped drive a cash and marketable securities balance of $146.8 billion at the end of 2013.

Highlights of the Company’s 2013our executive compensation program include the following:

The Compensation Committee did not grant any equity awards to the named executive officers in 2013.

Prior to the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders and continuing throughout the year, the Company engaged in outreach discussions with many of its largest shareholders. Ms. Jung, as Chair of the Compensation Committee, participated in a number ofreflects these discussions. In general, the shareholders supported the Company’s compensation practices and supported the Company’s proposal to attach performance criteria to a portion of the Company’s future equity awards to executive officers. At Mr. Cook’s request, the Compensation Committee began this initiative by amending his August 2011 RSU award to include performance-based vesting conditions with no upside opportunity.

To further enhance the link between named executive officers’ and shareholders’ interests, the Company implemented stock ownership guidelines for named executive officers to supplement the guidelines that were implemented for Mr. Cook in November 2012.

The base salaries for each named executive officer other than Mr. Cook were increased in 2013 following the Company’s announcement of changes to the executive team to encourage even more collaboration between the Company’s hardware, software, and services teams. The salary increases recognized the additional responsibilities assigned to the executive officers, as well as their exceptional individual performance, and were designed to maintain internal pay equity among the executive team. The target and maximum bonus levels for each named executive officer remained the same at 100% and 200%, respectively, of each officer’s base salary. Despite the salary increases and the fact that the Company has the highest revenue, operating income, and market capitalization of any of the primary peer group companies, the target annual cash compensation for the named executive officers is significantly below the median for executives with similar positions at peer companies.

The Company exceeded the maximum performance goals for both net sales and operating income set by the Compensation Committee for 2013. Accordingly, each executive officer received the maximum payout of 200% of base salary under the performance-based bonus plan.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

Determining Compensation for the Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Cook was promoted to CEO in August 2011. At that time, the Board granted Mr. Cook one million RSUs as a promotion and retention award (“2011 RSU award”). Fifty percent (50%) of Mr. Cook’s 2011 RSU award was scheduled to vest on August 24, 2016 (five years after the award date), and fifty percent (50%) of the award was scheduled to vest on August 24, 2021 (ten years after the award date), subject to Mr. Cook’s continued employment with the Company through the applicable vesting dates.

Move to Performance-Based Equity. The Company is in the process of designing future awards for executive officers, and it is committed to including performance criteria in a portion of the equity awards it

23


grants to executive officers in the future. In the past, these awards have been entirely time-based (i.e., vesting for continued service). In outreach discussions this year with many of the Company’s largest shareholders, shareholders supported this commitment to including performance criteria.

CEO Leadership by Example. Mr. Cook led this initiative by example with the full support of the Board. He asked the Compensation Committee to apply performance criteria to his 2011 RSU award as well as any potential future awards. After careful deliberation, the Compensation Committee approved a modification to Mr. Cook’s 2011 RSU award effective June 21, 2013. The amendment did not change the original grant date fair value of Mr. Cook’s award as originally reported in the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on January 9, 2012. Therefore, in accordance with applicable SEC rules, the amendment had no impact on Mr. Cook’s compensation for 2013 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 33. The amendment did, however, further align Mr. Cook’s potential realizable compensation from the award with the Company’s performance by placing more than $123 million of the original grant date fair value of the award at risk based on the Company’s performance.

Under the adopted modification, Mr. Cook will forfeit a portion of the 2011 RSU award, which was previously entirely time-based, if the Company does not achieve certain performance criteria. The modification does not contain an upside opportunity for overachievement of these criteria (i.e., the maximum number of shares payable to Mr. Cook pursuant to the award remains capped at the original number of RSUs subject to the award). Because the modification poses only downside risk, the Compensation Committee determined that a portion of the original grant should vest earlier than originally scheduled.

Performance Criteria and Shareholder Alignment. After careful deliberation and consultation with shareholders and its independent executive compensation consulting firm, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“F.W. Cook”), the Compensation Committee concluded that relative “total shareholder return” (“TSR”) would be the metric most relevant to the Company’s shareholders in evaluating the Company’s performance against that of other companies. The use of relative TSR creates inherent alignment with shareholders’ interests, and the measurement process for calculating relative TSR is simple and objective. A company’s TSR for a period of time is based on the change in its stock price during that period, taking into account any dividends paid during that period, which are assumed to be reinvested in the stock. If the ending value is lower than the beginning value, a negative TSR results and vice versa. The change in value from the beginning to the end of the period is divided by the beginning value. That percentage, whether positive or negative, is then compared to the TSR of other companies to calculate relative TSR.

2011 CEO Equity Award Modification. The Compensation Committee modified Mr. Cook’s 2011 RSU award to vest as follows: 100,000 RSUs remain scheduled to vest on August 24, 2016; 100,000 RSUs remain scheduled to vest on August 24, 2021; and the balance of 800,000 RSUs was separated into ten equal tranches of 80,000 RSUs each that vest over the ten-year life of the award. Details are explained below and illustrated in the table.

The Compensation Committee considered what percentage of Mr. Cook’s unvested RSUs to place at risk under the new performance criteria. Because Mr. Cook faces only downside risk from the modification, the Compensation Committee believed that less than 50% of the annual tranches should be placed at risk. Mr. Cook, however, expressed a strong desire to set a leadership example in the area of CEO compensation and governance and requested a larger at-risk percentage. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee placed 50% of the RSUs at risk in each future annual tranche.

The relative TSR criterion is applied to each 80,000 RSU tranche scheduled to vest on each anniversary of the original August 24, 2011 grant date, and compares the Company’s TSR to the TSR of the companies in the S&P 500 using public data derived from Standard and Poor’s. If the Company’s relative TSR is within the top third of that group, the RSUs in the tranche for that year will vest in full. If the Company’s relative TSR is in the

24


middle third, the RSUs in that tranche will be reduced by 25%, and if the Company’s relative TSR is in the bottom third, the RSUs in that tranche will be reduced by 50% (that is, all of the RSUs in that tranche placed at risk based on performance will be forfeited and Mr. Cook will receive the 50% of the RSU tranche that remains subject to only time-based vesting requirements).

In considering the time frame to measure relative TSR, the Compensation Committee determined, after consultation with F.W. Cook and shareholders, to use a three-year period and to ramp up to this three-year period starting with the tranche vesting in 2014. Therefore, the tranche vesting in August 2014 will be measured against a one-year TSR period. The tranche vesting in August 2015 will use a two-year period. The tranches vesting in 2016 and beyond will use a full trailing three-year period.

Because this modification took place in 2013, partway through the vesting period of the original 2011 grant, the Compensation Committee separately considered the treatment of the first two tranches that, if modified earlier, would have vested in August 2012 and August 2013. For the tranche that would have vested in August 2012, the RSUs vested in full on the June 21, 2013 modification date. This would have been the result whether the Compensation Committee had applied a one-, two-, or three-year relative TSR measurement in August 2012. For the tranche that vested in August 2013, the Compensation Committee vested the portion from August 25, 2012 until the June 21, 2013 modification date (65,754 shares) on a time basis and measured the remaining portion of the tranche (14,246 shares) by comparing the TSR of Apple stock from August 25, 2012 through August 24, 2013 to the performance of the companies in S&P 500 over that timeframe. As a result of this comparison, 50% of the remaining portion of the tranche was forfeited. Accordingly, 72,877 shares vested on August 24, 2013.

     Modified Award—RSUs Vesting 
     Time-Based
Units

Scheduled
to Vest
  Performance Based Units 

Vesting /

Earnout

Date

 Original
Award-RSUs

Vesting
   TSR
Measurement  Period
  Apple TSR vs. S&P 500 
    Bottom
Third
  Middle
Third
  Top
Third
 
   Start  End    
6/21/13   80,000    n/a    n/a    0    0    0(1) 
8/24/13   72,877(2)   8/25/12    8/24/13    0    3,562    7,123(2) 
8/24/14   40,000    8/25/13    8/24/14    0    20,000    40,000  
8/24/15   40,000    8/25/13    8/24/15    0    20,000    40,000  
8/24/16  500,000    140,000(3)   8/25/13    8/24/16    0    20,000    40,000  
8/24/17   40,000    8/25/14    8/24/17    0    20,000    40,000  
8/24/18   40,000    8/25/15    8/24/18    0    20,000    40,000  
8/24/19   40,000    8/25/16    8/24/19    0    20,000    40,000  
8/24/20   40,000    8/25/17    8/24/20    0    20,000    40,000  
8/24/21  500,000    140,000(4)   8/25/18    8/24/21    0    20,000    40,000  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Total  1,000,000    672,877              0    163,562    327,123  
 

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)The 2012 tranche vested on June 21, 2013 based on services provided.

(2)As to the 2013 tranche, 65,754 shares correspond to the period from August 25, 2012 to the June 21, 2013 modification of the award. This portion vested on August 24, 2013 based on services provided. The remaining 14,246 shares of the 2013 tranche (corresponding to the period from June 21, 2013 through August 24, 2013) were also scheduled to vest on August 24, 2013, but 50% of those shares were forfeited based on relative TSR performance from August 25, 2012 through August 24, 2013.

(3)Includes both the 2015 tranche vesting on August 24, 2016 as well as the additional 100,000 RSUs vesting on that date.

(4)Includes both the 2020 tranche vesting on August 24, 2021 as well as the additional 100,000 RSUs vesting on that date.

25


Dividend Equivalents. At his request, Mr. Cook’s RSU awards do not participate in dividend equivalents.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Under the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, Mr. Cook is expected to own shares of Company common stock that have a value equal to ten times his base salary. This stock ownership requirement is among the highest of any CEO in the Fortune 100. Although Mr. Cook was expected to satisfy the stock ownership guideline within five years of its implementation in 2012, he already satisfies the guideline. As of December 26, 2013, Mr. Cook owned shares of the Company’s common stock with a value equal to approximately 35 times his base salary.

Cash Compensation. Mr. Cook’s base salary of $1,400,000 has remained the same since November 2011. Mr. Cook participates in the same performance-based bonus program as the other named executive officers and has the same target and maximum bonus levels of 100% and 200%, respectively, of his base salary. Despite the fact that the Company has the highest revenue, operating income, and market capitalization of any of the primary peer group companies, Mr. Cook’s target annual cash compensation remains significantly below the median annual cash compensation level for CEOs at peer companies. This positioning relative to peer companies is based on data supplied by F.W. Cook in its review of publicly available data as of September 28, 2013.

Determining Compensation for the Other Named Executive Officers

Team-Based Approach. Each named executive officer is a member of the Company’s executive team. The Company’s executive compensation program is intended to promote and maintain stability within the executive team. Each named executive officer has been an employee of the Company for at least 15 years.

Performance Expectations. The compensation program for the executive team rests on two principles.expectations. First, each executive officer must demonstrate exceptional personal

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 28


performance in order to remain part of the executive team. The Company believesWe believe that executivesindividuals who underperform should either be removed from the executive team with their compensation adjusted accordingly, or be dismissed from the Company.Apple. Second, each executive officer must contribute as a member of the executive team to the Company’sApple’s overall success rather than focus solely on specific objectives within the officer’shis or her primary area of responsibility.

InternalEmphasis on Long-Term Equity. Because the Company’s Incentives. Our executive officers operate as a team, thecompensation program emphasizes long-term shareholder value creation by using both time-based and performance-based RSUs to deliver long-term compensation incentives. The Compensation Committee considers internal pay equitybelieves that this is the most effective way to be an important factor in the Compensation Committee’s decisions onattract and retain a talented executive compensation.team and align executives’ interests with those of shareholders. As a result, our executive compensation program is weighted considerably toward long-term equity awards rather than cash compensation and our executives hold significant unvested RSUs at any particular time. This practice is intended to create a substantial retention incentive, encourage our executives to focus on Apple’s long-term success, and align with the compensation awarded to eachlong-term interests of Messrs. Oppenheimer, Cue, Riccio, and Williams in 2013 was largely the same.our shareholders.

Compensation Practices. We follow sound compensation practices to support our guiding principles.

What We DoWhat We Don’t Do

Independent Compensation Consultant – Our Compensation Committee has directly retained an independent compensation consultant, which performs no services for Apple other than services for the Compensation Committee.

Risk Management – We prohibit short sales, transactions in derivatives of Apple securities, including hedging transactions, and pledging of shares by all executive officers. The Compensation Committee also conducts an annual compensation risk assessment.

Stock Ownership Guidelines – We have robust stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers.

Equity Clawback – Our RSU agreements have a recoupment provision requiring repayment to Apple of any shares or other amount that may be paid in respect of RSUs in the event of certain acts of misconduct.

Performance-Based, Long-Term Equity – We emphasize long-term equity awards with a substantial performance-based component in our pay mix.

Vesting and Performance Conditions on Dividend Equivalents – We apply the same vesting restrictions and performance conditions on dividend equivalents as on the underlying RSUs.

At-Will Employment – We employ our executive officers at will.

Change in Control Payments – We do not offer change in control payments or gross-ups of related excise taxes.

Special Perquisites – We do not provide executive perquisites that are not available to other employees generally.

Retirement Vesting – We do not include retirement acceleration provisions in equity awards.

Re-Pricing – We do not allow re-pricing of stock options without shareholder approval.

Pension or Other Special Benefits – We do not provide pensions or supplemental executive retirement, health, or insurance benefits.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 29


Discretion and Judgment of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee, determines allconsisting entirely of independent directors, reviews and approves the compensation of Apple’s executive officers and acts as the administering committee for the named executive officers. Apple’s equity compensation plans.

Each year, the Compensation Committee conducts an evaluation of each namedApple’s executive officercompensation program to determine if any changes would be appropriate. In making these determinations, the Compensation Committee may consult with its independent compensation consultant and management, as described below; however, the Compensation Committee uses its own judgment in making final decisions regarding the officer’s compensation arepaid to our executive officers.

The Role of the Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee selects and retains the services of its own independent compensation consultant and annually reviews the performance of the selected consultant. As part of the review process, the Compensation Committee considers the independence of the consultant in accordance with SEC and NASDAQ rules.

Since 2014, the Compensation Committee has engaged the services of Pay Governance, an independent compensation consulting firm. During 2016, Pay Governance provided no services to Apple other than services for the Compensation Committee, and worked with Apple’s management, as directed by the Compensation Committee, only on matters for which the Compensation Committee is responsible.

At the Compensation Committee’s request, Pay Governance regularly attends Compensation Committee meetings. Pay Governance also communicates with the Chair of the Compensation Committee outside committee meetings regarding matters related to the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities. In 2016, the Compensation Committee generally sought input from Pay Governance on a range of external market factors, including evolving compensation trends, appropriate based onpeer companies, and market data. Pay Governance also provided general observations about Apple’s compensation programs and management recommendations regarding the considerations described below.amount and form of compensation for our executive officers.

The Role of the Chief Executive Officer. At the Compensation Committee’s request, Mr. Cook provides input for the Compensation Committee regarding the performance and appropriate compensation of the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee gives considerable weight toconsiders Mr. Cook’s evaluation of the other named executive officers because of his direct knowledge of each executive officer’s performance and contributions.

The Role of the Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee selected and directly retained the services of F.W. Mr. Cook an independent executive compensation consulting firm, as to its compensation decisions for 2013. F.W. Cook didis not provide any other services to the Company and worked with the Company’s management only on matters for whichpresent during voting or deliberations by the Compensation Committee is responsible. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of F.W. Cook pursuant to SEC and Nasdaq rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent F.W. Cook from serving as an independent consultant to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee periodically sought input from F.W. Cook on a rangeregarding his own compensation.

26


of external market factors, including evolving compensation trends, appropriate peer companies and market survey data. F.W. Cook also provided general observations about the Company’s compensation programs, but it did not determine or recommend the amount or form of compensation for the named executive officers. Finally, F.W. Cook provided general observations in connection with the Compensation Committee’s consideration of the proposed Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan, but it did not determine or recommend any specific share limits for the plan. The Compensation Committee intends to review the appointment of its independent executive compensation consulting firm annually. As part of the review process, the Compensation Committee will consider the independence of the firm in accordance with applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules.

The Role of Peer Companies and Benchmarking.Benchmarking. The Compensation Committee reviews peer group composition each year. With the assistance of F.W. Cook,Pay Governance, the Compensation Committee identified a groupgroups of primary peer companies to useserve as market reference points for compensation comparison purposes for 2013. In determining the2016. A primary peer group the Compensation Committee selectedwas developed for reference consisting of U.S.-based, stand-alone, publicly traded companies in the technology, media, and internet services industries that, in itsthe Compensation Committee’s view, compete with the CompanyApple for talent and are in one of the following industries: communications equipment, computers and peripherals, diversified telecommunications services, internet and catalog retail, internet software and services, media, semiconductors and semiconductor equipment, or software. The threshold revenue and market capitalization requirements for a company to be considered for the peer group remained consistent with 2012 levels at $15 billion and $25 billion, respectively. Applying these criteria, Dell Inc. was removed and CBS Corporation, eBay Inc., and Time Warner Cable Inc. were added to the primary peer group used for compensation comparison purposes. Based on these criteria, the Company is significantly larger than the other companies in the primary peer group, with 2013 revenues of $170.9 billion and market capitalization of $434.1 billion at the end of 2013.

The Committee selected the following primary peer group for 2013:

Amazon.com, Inc.

EMC CorporationOracle Corporation

AT&T Inc.

Google Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated

CBS Corporation

Hewlett-Packard CompanyTime Warner Inc.

Cisco Systems, Inc.

Intel CorporationTime Warner Cable Inc.

Comcast Corporation

International Business Machines CorporationVerizon Communications Inc.

DIRECTV

Microsoft CorporationViacom Inc.

eBay Inc.

News Corporation*The Walt Disney Company

*

21st Century Fox was used for peer comparison purposes following News Corporation’s separation into two independent, publicly traded companies.

In 2012, the Compensation Committee established atalent. A secondary peer group of generalpremier companies that have iconic brands or are industry “mega-cap”or category leaders, rely on significant R&D and innovation for growth, and require highly-skilled human capital was also considered as an additional reference set for the Compensation Committee. The companies to provide a broader perspective on pay levels and practices for companies whose revenues and market capitalization were generally more comparable to the Company than to those in the primary peer group. The thresholds for inclusion in the secondaryeach peer group are $75 billion in revenue and a 12-month average market capitalization of $150 billion. Companies that are already included in the primary peer group are excluded. Using the same criteria, the following secondary peer group for 2013 remained the same as in 2012:

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

General Electric Company

Chevron Corporation

Procter & Gamble Co.

Exxon Mobil Corporation

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

listed below. Unless otherwise specified, references in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis to peer companies include both the primary and the secondary peer group companies.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 30


In June 2015, the Compensation Committee selected the following companies for the 2016 primary peer group:

Amazon.com

Disney

IBM

Time Warner Cable

AT&T

eBay

Intel

Twenty-First Century Fox

CBS

EMC

Microsoft

Verizon

Cisco Systems

Facebook

Oracle

Viacom

Comcast

Google (now Alphabet)

Qualcomm

DIRECTV

Hewlett-Packard

Time Warner

The threshold revenue and market capitalization requirements for a company to be considered for the primary peer group for 2016 were $15 billion and $35 billion, respectively. In addition, although each was slightly below the thresholds, the Compensation Committee decided to retain Viacom and CBS in the primary peer group for consistency with the 2015 primary peer group. The Compensation Committee also decided to add Facebook to the primary peer group based on market capitalization, revenue similar to other companies in the primary peer group, and the fact that it competes with Apple for talent. Following the spinoff of Hewlett Packard Enterprise in November 2015, the Compensation Committee continued to include HP Inc. (formerly Hewlett-Packard) and Hewlett Packard Enterprises in the 2016 primary peer group.

Based on the revenue and market capitalization criteria described above, Apple continues to be significantly larger than the companies selected for the 2016 primary peer group, with 2016 revenue of $215.6 billion and market capitalization of $601.4 billion as of the end of 2016.

LOGO

In the table above, revenue for primary peer group companies is the amount reported by each company in its most recently filed annual report as of the Record Date, and market capitalization for primary peer group companies is the amount provided by Bloomberg L.P. as of September 23, 2016, the last trading day of Apple’s fiscal year. The table includes Alphabet, HP Inc., and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The table does not include DIRECTV, EMC, or Time Warner Cable, which either merged with or were acquired by another company before September 23, 2016.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 31


In June 2015, the Compensation Committee selected the following companies for the 2016 secondary peer group:

3M

Johnson & Johnson

American Express

Nike

Boeing

PepsiCo

Coca-Cola

Procter & Gamble

General Electric

The Compensation Committee reviews both compensation practices and performanceprogram design at peer companies to inform its decision-making process so it can set total compensation levels that it believes are commensurate with the

27


Company’sApple’s scope and performance. The Compensation Committee, however, does not set compensation components to meet specific benchmarks as compared to peer companies, such as targeting salaries “above the median” or equity compensation “at the 75that a specific market percentile. The Compensation Committee further believes that over-reliance on benchmarking can result in compensation that is unrelated to the value delivered by the namedour executive officers because compensation benchmarking does not take into account the specific performance of the named executive officers or the relative size and performance of the Company. Except as otherwise noted, theApple. The Compensation Committee’s executive compensation determinations are subjective and the result of the Compensation Committee’s business judgment, which is informed by the experiences of the members of the Compensation Committee as well as the input from, and peer group data provided by, the Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant.

ConsiderationShareholder Feedback. We value the feedback provided by our shareholders and have discussions with many of Say-on-Pay Vote Results. The Company provides its shareholders withthem on an ongoing basis regarding various corporate governance topics, including executive compensation. Shareholders are also provided the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote on executive compensation (a “say-on-pay proposal”).compensation. At the Company’s 2013Apple’s 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, shareholders indicated their support for the compensation of our named executive officers, with approximately 61%95% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal were voted in favorfor the proposal. The design of the proposal. Prior to2016 executive compensation program follows the 2013 annual meeting and continuing throughout the year, the Company’s management engaged in outreach discussions with many of its largest shareholders. Ms. Jung,same design as Chair of2015. However, for 2017, the Compensation Committee participated in a numberhas continued to evolve our executive compensation program by changing the allocation of these discussions. In general, the shareholders supported the Company’s compensation practices and supported the Company’s proposal to attach performance criteria to a portion of the Company’s future executive equity awards that have been entirely time-based in the past. At Mr. Cook’s request, the Compensation Committee began this initiative by amending his 2011 RSU award to include performance-based vesting conditions (as explained in more detail above). Finally, to further enhance the link between named executive officers’ and shareholders’ interests, the Company implemented stock ownership guidelines for namedour executive officers (as explained in more detail below)from 60% time-based and 40% performance-based RSUs to supplement the guidelines that were implemented50% time-based and 50% performance-based RSUs, thereby placing an even greater emphasis on performance-based equity awards for Mr. Cook in November 2012. Mr. Cook already satisfies the guidelines by owning shares of the Company’s stock with a value equal to approximately 35 times his base salary.our executive officers.

The Company believes these actions directly address the concerns of the Company’s shareholders. The Company’s management continues to engage in dialogue with its large shareholders, and the Compensation Committee will continue to consider shareholder feedback and the results of the Company’s say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.decisions.

ELEMENTS OF THE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND 2013 COMPENSATION2016 Named Executive Officer Compensation

The Company’s currentOur executive compensation program is designed to be simple, in design.effective, and link pay to performance, while reflecting the size, scope, and success of Apple’s business, as well as the responsibilities of our executive officers. It consistsincorporates elements that create shareholder value by driving financial performance, retaining a high-performing and talented executive team, and aligning the interests of three components, listed in orderthe executive team with the interests of their importance:shareholders. The main elements of the executive compensation program are:

 

  

Long-term equity awards in the form of RSUs under the Company’s shareholder-approved employee incentive plan (currently, the Company’s 2003 Employee Stock Plan (the “2003 Plan”));Base salary

 

Annual cash incentive

Annual performance-based cash bonuses under

Long-term equity incentives

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 32


The chart below shows target dollar values for the 2003 Plan; and

Base salaries.

The Company emphasizes long-term equity awards and annual performance-based cash bonuses so that a substantial portionmain elements of each executive’s total compensation opportunity is linked directly to the Company’s stock price or otherwise driven by performance.

Theour named executive officers are also eligible to participate in the Company’s health and welfare programs, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 401(k) plan, matching gifts program, and other broad-based programs on the same basis as other employees.

officers’ 2016 compensation.

 

LOGO

Tim Cook has not received an equity award since 2011
LOGO

28


The Role of Long-Term EquityCash Compensation Elements and Awards

Emphasis on RSUs. The Company has traditionally believed that long-term equity awards in the formBase Salary. Base salary is a customary, fixed element of RSUs are the most effective waycompensation intended to attract and retain a talented executive team and align executives’ interests with those of shareholders. Accordingly, the Company’s executive compensation program in recent years has been weighted considerably toward long-term equity awards rather than cash compensation. The Company believes RSUs create incentives for performance and further align executives’ interests with those of shareholders because an RSU’s value increases or decreases in conjunction with the Company’s stock price. As explained in more detail above, the Company is committed to including performance criteria in a portion of the equity awards it grants to executive officers in the future. At Mr. Cook’s request, the Compensation Committee began this initiative in 2013 by amending his 2011 RSU award to include performance-based vesting conditions.

Frequency of Equity Awards and Impact on the Summary Compensation Table. In general, the Company’s recent practice has been to grant equity awards to executives, other than the CEO, approximately every two fiscal years (with limited exceptions for special cases, such as awards to new hires or in connection with promotions). Consistent with this practice, the Company did not grant any equity awards to its executive officers in 2013. In accordance with applicable SEC rules, the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table—2013, 2012, and 2011” includes as compensation for each named executive officer the full grant-date fair value (as determined under generally accepted accounting principles) for all equity awards granted to the named executive officer during each year shown in the table. Accordingly, the compensation shown for each named executive officer will generally be comparatively high for the years in which the Company grants RSU awards to the officers and comparatively low for the years in which the Company does not grant RSU awards.

Long Vesting Periods Maximize Retention and Support Long-Term Focus. The Company believes granting awards with long vesting periods creates a substantial retention incentive and also encourages the named executive officers to focus on the Company’s long-term business objectives and long-term stock price performance.executives. The Compensation Committee has discretion to grant awards with different vesting schedules for new hires or employees who are promotedconsiders market data provided by its independent compensation consultant, internal pay equity among the executive officers, and Apple’s financial results and market capitalization relative to the executive team,peer companies when setting base salaries. Taking these factors into consideration and in special cases as determined by the Compensation Committee.

Dividend Equivalents. Dividend equivalents accrue on all unvested RSUs, other than RSUs held by Mr. Cook,recognition of his individual performance and are paid out on the vesting of the underlying RSUs. The crediting of dividend equivalents is meant to preserve the equity-based incentives intended by the Company when the awards were granted and to treat employees with RSU awards consistently with shareholders. As noted above, atremarkable leadership, Mr. Cook’s request, his RSU awards do not participate in dividend equivalents.

base salary was increased to $3 million at the beginning of 2016. The Rolebase salary for each of Cash Compensation

Overview. The named executive officers’ cash compensation consists of base salaries and performance-based cash bonuses. In October 2012, the Compensation Committee increased the base salaries of theour named executive officers, other than Mr. Cook, as noted below. There were no changes to theremained unchanged at $1 million for 2016.

Annual Cash Incentive. The Compensation Committee approves, on an annual basis, a performance-based cash bonus programincentive opportunity for our executive officers based on the executive officers.

Despite the salary increases and the fact that the Company has the highest revenue, operating income, and market capitalizationachievement of anyannual financial performance goals. For 2016, each of the primary peer group companies, the target annual cash compensation for theour named executive officers is significantly below the median for executives with similar positions at peer companies. This positioning relative to peer companies is based on data supplied by F.W. Cook in its review of publicly available data as of September 28, 2013.

Base Salaries. Base salaries are customary and help attract and retain executives. In October 2012, the Company announced changes to the executive team to encourage even more collaboration between the Company’s hardware, software, and services teams. Following this announcement, the Compensation Committee

29


increased the base salary of the executive officers, other than Mr. Cook, from $800,000 to $875,000. This change was intended to recognize the additional responsibilities assigned to the officers, as well as their exceptional individual performance, and to maintain internal equity among the executive team.

Performance-Based Cash Bonuses. The Compensation Committee awards performance-basedhad a threshold annual cash bonuses to compensate the named executive officers for achieving the Company’s annual performance goals. The target and maximum bonus levels for the named executive officers remained the same in 2013 at 100% and 200%, respectively, of each officer’s base salary.

The bonuses represent a relatively small percentage of the executives’ total compensation given the Company’s emphasis on long-term equity awards. In addition, the Company prefers to emphasize long-term shareholder value creation over annual operating results. Accordingly, the bonus program is modestly funded relative to those generally in place at peer companies, as reflected by the following:

The target bonusincentive opportunity of 100% of base salary, is lower than those of peer companies, where mediana target bonus levels of executives with similar positions range from 143% to 189% of base salary;

The maximum bonusannual cash incentive opportunity of 200% of base salary, for exceptional performance is lower than theand a maximum bonus levels generally provided at peer companies; and

The Company has no long-termannual cash bonus program.incentive opportunity of 400% of base salary.

Performance Criteria. The performance criteria used to determine the annual bonuses for the named executive officers were netNet sales and operating income, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These criteriaprinciples, were chosen as the performance measures for the 2016 annual cash incentive opportunity because they reflect commonly recognized measures of overall company performance and are associated withdrivers of shareholder value creation. Payouts of the creation of value for shareholders.

Performance Goals. Performance goalsannual cash incentive are set at target and maximum levels based on objectives in the Company’s internal business plan. The target and maximum net sales performance goals for 2013 were set at approximately 22% and 21% higher, respectively, than the target and maximum net sales performance goals approved under the Company’s 2012 bonus program, and at levels that were greater than the Company’s actual net sales for 2012. The target and maximum operating income performance goals for 2013 were each set approximately 16% higher than the target and maximum operating income performance goals approved under the Company’s 2012 bonus program, and at levels that were significantly greater than the Company’s actual 2011 operating income but less than the Company’s actual 2012 operating income.

The Compensation Committee believed that the Company’s operating income for 2012 would be difficult to repeat in 2013, in part, because the Company’s business plan for 2013 included the introduction of new versions of existing products with higher cost structures and flat or reduced pricing, the introduction of iPad mini with gross margin significantly below the Company’s average product margins, and price reductions on certain products, including iPad 2 and iPhone 4. The Committee believed that significant leadership efforts would be required to achieve the 2013 performance goals. The table below shows the target and maximum goals and the Company’s actual performance for 2013.

   2013 (in Millions) 

Performance Criteria

  Target Goal   Maximum Goal   Actual Performance 

Net Sales

  $165,250    $170,000    $170,910  

Operating Income

  $44,939    $47,072    $48,999  

Payout Structure. The payout structure isdetermined based on an equal weighting offor the net sales and operating income and net sales because each measuremeasures. There is considered equally important in the Company’s internal business plan. The performance-based cash bonuses are defined as a percentage of the executive’s base salary, and payouts are

30


interpolatedno payout for achievement of performance between the target and maximum goals. No payout is made relative to a particular performance criterionmeasure unless the targetthreshold performance goal is achieved with respect to that criterion. The payout structure in effect for 2013 is shown in the table below.

   Percentage of Base Salary Payable as Performance-Based Cash Bonus

Performance Criteria

  Target Goal Maximum Goal 2013 Payout Based on Actual Performance

Net Sales

  50% 100% 100%

Operating Income

  50% 100% 100%
    

 

Total Payout

    200%
    

 

At the end of the year, the Compensation Committee determines the amount of the bonus to be paid to each executive officer by comparing the Company’s financial results tomeasure. Payouts are calculated based on the performance goals. The Committee also consideredlevel achieved for each performance measure for 2016 and are linearly interpolated for achievement between the Company’s 2013 results relative to peer companies,threshold, target, and it recognized that the Company’s net sales and operating income were significantly higher than any of the primary peer group companies.maximum goals. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, reduce (but not increase) the amountactual payout of any individual bonusindividual’s annual cash incentive based on itsApple’s performance and the Compensation Committee’s subjective assessment of the named executive officer’s overall performance. In 2013, the Company exceeded the maximum

The Compensation Committee established performance goals in the first quarter of 2016, taking into consideration Apple’s 2015 financial results, macroeconomic factors, the payout opportunities based on attainment of performance goals at threshold, target, and maximum levels, and pay-for-performance alignment.

2016 Goals and Results

LOGO

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 33


As shown in the table above, our 2016 net sales of $215.6 billion and operating income of $60.0 billion were 96.4% and 99.5% of the respective target goals set by the Compensation Committee. This performance resulted in a combined payout at 89.5% of target for botheach named executive officer. Overall, our 2016 performance with respect to net sales and operating income was 7.7% and 15.7% below our record-breaking 2015 levels; however, the 2016 payouts to our named executive officers were significantly less than the annual cash incentive payouts for 2015, reflecting strong pay-for-performance alignment. The Compensation Committee determined that no downward adjustments to the bonusespayouts would be made, based on Apple’s 2016 performance and the individual contributions of our named executive officers.

Long-Term Equity Elements and Awards

Our executive compensation program emphasizes long-term shareholder value creation through the use of equity awards in the form of RSUs to deliver long-term compensation incentives. The Compensation Committee has discretion to approve awards with different vesting conditions as it deems necessary to meet the objectives of our executive compensation program.

Performance-Based RSUs. The number of performance-based RSUs granted to our named executive officers that vest depends on Apple’s total shareholder return relative to the other companies in the S&P 500 for the performance period (“Relative TSR”). The Compensation Committee chose Relative TSR as a straightforward and objective metric for Apple’s shareholders to evaluate our performance against the performance of other companies and to align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of shareholders.

We measure Relative TSR for a specified period of time based on the change in each company’s stock price during that period, taking into account any dividends paid during that period, which are assumed to be reinvested in the stock. The change in value from the beginning to the end of the period is divided by the beginning value to determine total shareholder return. Apple’s total shareholder return is compared to the total shareholder return of other companies, ranked by percentile, to determine the number of performance-based RSUs that vest for each performance period. An averaging period is used to determine the beginning and ending stock price values used to calculate Relative TSR for the performance period. This mitigates the impact on the long-term Relative TSR results of one-day or short-term stock price fluctuations at the beginning or end of the performance period. The beginning stock price value is calculated using each company’s average closing stock price for the 20 consecutive trading days immediately prior to the beginning of the performance period. The ending stock price value is calculated using each company’s average closing price for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the last day of the performance period.

Time-Based RSUs. Equity awards with time-based vesting align the interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholders and promote the stability and retention of a strong executive team over the longer term. Vesting schedules for time-based awards generally require continuous service over multiple years, as described below.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 34


Mr. Cook’s Long-Term Equity Award

Mr. Cook last received an equity award when he was promoted to Chief Executive Officer in 2011 (the “2011 RSU Award”). At Mr. Cook’s request, the 2011 RSU Award was modified in 2013 to put a portion of the award at risk based on Apple’s Relative TSR performance. The performance condition requires Apple to outperform two-thirds of the comparative companies in the S&P 500 for each performance period in order for 100% of the performance-based RSUs allocated to that period to vest. The 2011 RSU Award only has downside risk to Mr. Cook. It does not contain an upside vesting opportunity, and there is no interpolation for results between the Relative TSR percentile levels set forth below.

Relative TSR Percentile v.
S&P 500 Companies
Performance-Based
RSUs Vesting
Top Third100%
Middle Third50%
Bottom Third0%

For the three-year performance period from August 25, 2013 through August 24, 2016, 280,000 performance-based RSUs were subject to the Relative TSR performance condition. Apple’s Relative TSR for this performance period was at the 78th percentile of the companies that were included in the S&P 500 for the entire performance period. As a result, all of the 280,000 performance-based RSUs vested on August 24, 2016.

Other Named Executive Officers’ Long-Term Equity Awards

In October 2015, the Compensation Committee awarded RSUs with a grant date fair value of $20 million (the “Annual RSU Awards”) to each of our named executive officers, other than Mr. Cook. The Annual RSU Awards were allocated between 60% time-based and 40% performance-based RSUs as a percentage of the grant date fair value reported in the Summary Compensation Table. The value and relative mix of the Annual RSU Awards was a subjective determination by the Compensation Committee based on its own business judgment after taking into consideration factors such as market compensation data provided by its independent compensation consultant, its subjective assessment of the appropriate relationship between time- and performance-based awards, historical equity grants, and, with respect to the value of the awards, financial results and market capitalization compared to peer companies.

The Annual RSU Awards granted as performance-based RSUs in October 2015 have a three-year performance-period (fiscal years 2016 through 2018) and will vest on October 1, 2018, subject to continued employment through that date, with zero to 200% of the target number of shares vesting depending on Apple’s Relative TSR percentile ranking for the performance period, as follows:

Relative TSR Percentile v.
S&P 500 Companies

Performance-Based RSUs Vesting

as a Percentage of Target

85th or above200%
55th100%
25th25%
below 25th0%

This vesting schedule requires Relative TSR performance at the 25th percentile to vest in the threshold number of shares, Relative TSR performance at the 55th percentile to vest in the target number of shares, and Relative TSR performance that is significantly above the median at the 85th percentile in order to vest in the maximum 200% of the target number of shares.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 35


No RSUs vest if Apple’s Relative TSR performance is below the 25th percentile. In addition, if Apple’s total shareholder return for the performance period is negative, the number of RSUs that vests is capped at 100% of the target number of shares regardless of our percentile ranking. If Apple’s Relative TSR percentile ranking is above the 25th percentile and between the levels shown in the table above, the portion of the RSUs that vests is linearly interpolated between the two nearest vesting percentages.

During 2016, Mr. Maestri vested in performance-based RSUs that were granted on May 29, 2014 in connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer. For the 16-month performance period from May 29, 2014 through the end of 2015, Apple’s Relative TSR was at the 85th percentile of the companies that were included in the S&P 500 for the period. As a result, Mr. Maestri vested in 15,918 performance-based RSUs on October 1, 2015. At the beginning of 2017, for the 28-month period from May 29, 2014 through the end of 2016, Mr. Maestri vested in 10,694 performance-based RSUs based on Apple’s Relative TSR at the 67th percentile of the companies that were included in the S&P 500 for the period.

During 2016, Ms. Ahrendts vested in performance-based RSUs that were granted on May 1, 2014 in connection with her hiring. For the two-year performance period from May 1, 2014 through April 30, 2016, Apple’s Relative TSR was at the 81st percentile of the companies that were included in the S&P 500 for the period. As a result, Ms. Ahrendts vested in 75,124 performance-based RSUs on May 1, 2016.

During 2016, Mr. Cue, Mr. Riccio, and Mr. Sewell vested in annual performance-based RSUs that were granted on March 3, 2014. For the two-year performance period from the beginning of 2014 through the end of 2015, Apple’s Relative TSR was at the 92nd percentile of the companies that were included in the S&P 500 for the period. As a result, each of Mr. Cue, Mr. Riccio, and Mr. Sewell vested in 92,764 performance-based RSUs on October 1, 2015. At the beginning of 2017, for the three-year period from the beginning of 2014 through the end of 2016, each of Mr. Cue, Mr. Riccio, and Mr. Sewell vested in 87,578 performance-based RSUs based on Apple’s Relative TSR at the 83rd percentile of the companies that were included in the S&P 500 for the period.

The Annual RSU Awards granted as time-based RSUs in October 2015 vest in three equal annual installments commencing on April 1, 2018 (approximately two and one-half years following the grant date), subject to continued employment through each applicable vesting date. This schedule means that, to receive the full benefit of the time-based RSU award, the recipient must generally perform four and one-half years of continuous service following the grant date. The April vesting dates for the time-based RSUs were selected to balance the October vesting of the performance-based RSUs and provide regular vesting intervals.

In October 2016, the Compensation Committee took into consideration a number of factors, including shareholder feedback, and increased the performance-based component of the 2017 Annual RSU Awards to 50% of the grant date fair value, placing an even greater emphasis on performance-based compensation for our executive officers.

Dividend Equivalents

At Mr. Cook’s request, none of his RSUs participate in dividend equivalents. All other unvested RSUs granted to Apple employees have dividend equivalents. Dividend equivalents entitle holders of RSUs to the same dividend value per share as holders of common stock. Dividend equivalents are subject to the same vesting and other terms and conditions as the corresponding unvested RSUs. Dividend equivalents are accumulated and paid when the underlying RSUs vest.

Other Benefits

Our executive officers are eligible to participate in our health and welfare programs, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 401(k) Plan, matching gifts program, vacation cash-out, and other benefit programs on the same basis as other employees.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 36


Security. The personal safety and security of our employees is of the utmost importance to Apple and its shareholders. Accordingly, we provide risk-based, business-related security services to our employees, including our named executive officers, as appropriate. Although not requested by Mr. Cook, given the profile of the company and Mr. Cook’s role as CEO, Apple also provides risk-based personal security services for him, as determined to be appropriate by our security team. We do not consider these security measures to be a personal benefit for Mr. Cook, but rather a reasonable and necessary expense for the benefit of Apple. We also offer risk-based personal security assistance to members of our executive team based on the highly visible nature of their roles. The aggregate incremental cost of these services is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in accordance with SEC disclosure rules.

Relocation Assistance. Relocation assistance, including a gross-up for taxable relocation benefits, is provided to employees when necessary based on business needs. Ms. Ahrendts was provided relocation assistance to move closer to Apple’s headquarters in connection with her hiring. Some of these relocation expenses were incurred in 2016 and are reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

Severance. We generally do not enter into severance arrangements with our executive officers. An exception to this practice was made in connection with hiring Ms. Ahrendts in May 2014 in recognition of the risk she assumed by leaving her prior role as Chief Executive Officer of Burberry. Ms. Ahrendts has a limited cash severance arrangement until May 2017 and equity acceleration for a portion of her outstanding equity awards, in each case, in the event of a termination by Apple other than for “Cause,” or if she resigns for “Good Reason.” Details of the arrangement with Ms. Ahrendts are described under “Executive Compensation—Executive Compensation Tables” in the section entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Chartered Aircraft. From time to time, members of the executive team, including each of the named executive officers, performance-based cash bonuses equalmay request chartered aircraft services to 200%facilitate travel that is directly and integrally related to the performance of their base salaries.

No Employment Agreementsjob duties and when the use of a chartered plane will increase efficiency or Other Arrangements

The namedsecurity associated with a particular trip. Occasionally, spouses or other family members may accompany an executive officers are employed at will. Basedon these flights. When this occurs, we require the executive to pay the greater of the incremental cost, if any, to accommodate these guests on the Company’s philosophy that its executive compensation program should be simple and directly linkedflight or the imputed income amount determined using the IRS Standard Industry Fare Level (SIFL) rate. Accordingly, there is no incremental cost to performance, the compensation programApple for the named executive officers doesnot include any of the following pay practices:family accompaniment on chartered business flights.

Employment agreements;

Severance arrangements;

Cash payments in connection with a change in control of the Company;

Tax gross-ups;

Supplemental executive retirement benefits; or

Supplemental health or insurance benefits.

In addition, as explained above, the Company does not provide tax reimbursements to the named executive officers, nor does it provide perquisites or change in control benefits to its officers that are not available to employees generally.

Governance and Other Considerations

Tax Deductibility of Compensation Expense.Expense. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) places a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation the Companya company can deduct in any one year for compensation paid to the chief executive officer and the three most highly-compensated executive officers employed by the Companycompany at the end of the year (other than the Company’s chief financial officer). However, the $1 million deduction limit generally does not apply to compensation that is performance-based and provided under a shareholder-approved plan. While the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of awards as

31


one factor in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions, as noted above, and retains the flexibility to grant awardsaward compensation that it determines to be consistent with the Company’s goal for itsgoals of our executive compensation program even if the award isawards are not deductible by the CompanyApple for tax purposes.

The Company’s performance-basedIn general, the 2016 annual cash bonuses areincentive opportunities for executive officers have been designed in a manner intended to be excludedexempt from the $1 million deduction limitlimitation of Section 162(m) because they are paid based on achievement of pre-determined performance goals established by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 2003 Plan. In addition, asour shareholder-approved equity incentive plan.

As a result of the modification of Mr. Cook’s 2011 RSU award to add pre-determined performance criteria,Award, we intend that the tranches of the award subject to performance criteria with measurement periods that begin after the June 21, 2013 modification be exempt from the deduction limitation of Section 162(m). In addition, the performance-based RSU awards granted to our other named executive officers in 2016 are expectedalso intended to be excludedexempt from the $1 million deduction limit. However, the Company’slimitation of Section 162(m).

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 37


Base salary and RSU awards with only time-based vesting requirements, and the tranche of Mr. Cook’s 2011 RSU award withwhich represent a performance measurement period that commenced before the dateportion of the modification, doequity awards granted to our executive officers, are not qualify for tax deductibility underexempt from Section 162(m), and therefore will not be deductible to the extent the $1 million limit of Section 162(m) is exceeded. As discussed above,

Despite the Company is committedCompensation Committee’s efforts to including performance criteriastructure the executive team annual cash incentives and performance-based RSUs in a portion of future equity awards grantedmanner intended to executive officers. The Company will consider tax deductibility underbe exempt from Section 162(m) and therefore not subject to its deduction limits, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, no assurance can be given that compensation we intend to satisfy the requirements for exemption from Section 162(m) in fact will. Further, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) if it designs future equity awardsdetermines that such modifications are consistent with performance-based vesting conditions to executive officers.Apple’s business needs.

ClawbackRecoupment of RSU Awards.RSUs. The named executive officers’ RSU awardsRSUs are granted underpursuant to the Company’sterms of our standard RSU agreement. This agreement requiresagreements. These terms require an employee to deliver or otherwise repay to the CompanyApple any shares or other amount that may be paid in respect of an RSU awardRSUs in the event the employee commits a felony while employed by Apple, or engages in a breach of confidentiality, commits an act of theft, embezzlement or fraud, or materially breaches any agreement with the Company.Apple while employed by Apple or at any time thereafter.

Prohibition on Hedging, Pledging, and Short Sales. The Company prohibits short sales andSales. We prohibit transactions in derivatives of Company securities,Apple stock, including hedging transactions, for all directors, officers, employees, consultants, and contractors of Apple. In addition, we prohibit pledging of Apple stock as collateral by directors and executive officers of the Company.Apple and prohibit short sales of Apple stock by directors and executive officers of Apple.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Under the Company’sour stock ownership guidelines, Mr. Cook is expected to own shares of Company commonApple stock that have a value equal to ten times his base salary. As discussed above,Although Mr. Cook was required to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines within five years of its implementation in 2012, he already satisfiesowns shares with a value significantly in excess of the guideline. Other namedguidelines. All other executive officers are expected to own shares that have a value equal to three times their base salary. This guideline is expected to be satisfiedsalary by the later of February 6, 2018, or within five years after an officer first becomes subject to the guideline.guidelines. Shares may be owned directly by the individual, owned jointly with or separately by the individual’s spouse, or held in trust for the benefit of the individual, the individual’s spouse or children.

Risk Considerations.Considerations. The Compensation Committee considers, in establishing and reviewing the executive compensation program, whether the program encourages unnecessary or excessive risk takingrisk-taking and has concluded that it does not. See the section entitled “Board Oversight of Risk Management” above for an additional discussion of risk considerations.

Compensation Decisions for 2014

Performance Conditions on Future Equity Awards. The Company has not yet determined the terms and conditions of any equity awards to be granted to the named executive officers in 2014; however, as noted above, the Company is committed to including performance criteria in a portion of the equity awards it grants to executive officers in the future.

 

32Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 38


Executive Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table—2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014

The following table, showsfootnotes, and related narrative show information regarding the total compensation of each named executive officer for 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 2011,2014, except in the casescase of Mr. Riccio,Sewell, who was not a named executive officer in 2012 and 2011, and Mr. Williams, who was not a named executive officer in 2011.2014.

 

Name and Principal Position
(a)

 Year
(b)
  Salary
($)(c)
  Bonus
($)(d)
  Stock
Awards
(1)($)(e)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(2)($)(f)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(g)
  Total
($)(h)
 

Timothy Cook

Chief Executive Officer

  2013    1,400,006    —      —      2,800,000    52,721(3)   4,252,727  
  2012    1,357,718    —      —      2,800,000    17,274    4,174,992  
  2011    900,017    —      376,180,000    900,000    16,520    377,996,537  

Peter Oppenheimer

Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer

  2013    866,061    —      —      1,750,000    16,791(4)   2,632,852  
  2012    805,400    —      66,169,750    1,600,000    16,412    68,591,562  
  2011    700,014    —      —      700,000    16,129    1,416,143  

Eduardo Cue

Senior Vice President,
Internet Software and Services

  2013    866,061    —      —      1,750,000    31,044(5)   2,647,105  
  2012    805,400    —      47,975,262    1,600,000    39,753    50,420,415  
  2011    607,704    —      51,852,000    444,615    48,656    52,952,975  

Daniel Riccio

Senior Vice President,

Hardware Engineering

  2013    866,061    —      —      1,750,000    16,791(6)   2,632,852  

Jeffrey Williams

Senior Vice President,

Operations

  2013    866,061    —      —      1,750,000    16,791(7)   2,632,852  
  2012    805,400    —      66,269,800    1,600,000    16,412    68,691,612  
       

Name and Principal Position

(a)

 

Year

(b)

   

Salary

($)(c)

   

Bonus

($)(d)

   

Stock

Awards(1)

($)(e)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation(2)

($)(f)

  

All Other

Compensation

($)(g)

  

Total

($)(h)

 

Tim Cook

 

Chief Executive Officer

  2016     3,000,000              5,370,000    377,719(3)   8,747,719  
 

 

 

 

2015

 

  

  

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

8,000,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

281,327

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,281,327

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

1,748,462

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

6,700,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

774,176

 

  

 

 

 

 

9,222,638

 

  

Luca Maestri

 

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

  2016     1,000,000          20,000,083    1,790,000    13,486(4)   22,803,569  
 

 

 

 

2015

 

  

  

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

20,000,105

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,000,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

337,872

 

  

 

 

 

 

25,337,977

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

717,211

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

11,335,043

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,608,255

 

  

 

 

 

 

342,292

 

  

 

 

 

 

14,002,801

 

  

Angela Ahrendts

 

Senior Vice President,
Retail

  2016     1,000,000          20,000,083    1,790,000    112,809(5)   22,902,892  
 

 

 

 

2015

 

  

  

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

20,000,105

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,000,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

779,124

 

  

 

 

 

 

25,779,229

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

411,538

 

  

  

 

 

 

500,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

70,001,196

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,648,352

 

  

 

 

 

 

790,038

 

  

 

 

 

 

73,351,124

 

  

Eddy Cue

 

Senior Vice President,
Internet Software and
Services

  2016     1,000,000          20,000,083    1,790,000    17,461(6)   22,807,544  
 

 

 

 

2015

 

  

  

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

20,000,105

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,000,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

52,136

 

  

 

 

 

 

25,052,241

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

947,596

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

20,000,900

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,437,500

 

  

 

 

 

 

59,743

 

  

 

 

 

 

24,445,739

 

  

Dan Riccio

 

Senior Vice President,
Hardware Engineering

  2016     1,000,000          20,000,083    1,790,000    17,461(7)   22,807,544  
 

 

 

 

2015

 

  

  

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

20,000,105

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,000,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

17,521

 

  

 

 

 

 

25,017,626

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

947,596

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

20,000,900

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,437,500

 

  

 

 

 

 

17,239

 

  

 

 

 

 

24,403,235

 

  

Bruce Sewell

 

Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and
Secretary

  2016     1,000,000          20,000,083    1,790,000    17,461(8)   22,807,544  
 

 

 

 

2015

 

  

  

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

 

 

20,000,105

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,000,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

17,521

 

  

 

 

 

 

25,017,626

 

  

          

 

(1)

The grant date fair value for time-based RSUs is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company’sApple’s common stock on the date of grant. ForThe grant date fair value for performance-based RSUs is calculated based on a descriptionMonte-Carlo valuation of each award on the date of grant, determined under FASB ASC 718. Assuming the highest level of performance is achieved under the applicable performance conditions, the maximum possible value of the assumptions and methodologies usedperformance-based RSUs granted to calculateeach of the amountsnamed executive officers in 2016 (other than Mr. Cook), using the table, seegrant date fair value, is $16,000,122. See Note 1—

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 39


Summary of Significant Accounting Policies found in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Annual Report in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. PursuantStatements in the Annual Report, and also see footnote 1 to SEC rules, the amounts reported for Mr. Cook’s 2011 award exclude the impacttable entitled “Grants of estimated forfeitures related to performance-based vesting conditions.Plan-Based Awards—2016.”

The following table shows the two components of the Stock Award compensation shown in Column (e) above for Peter Oppenheimer, Eduardo Cue and Jeffrey Williams in 2012:

Name

  Aggregate
Grant Date
Fair Value
of New RSUs
Awarded in
2012
($)(i)
   Accounting Charges
due to RSU
Modification to
Provide Dividend
Equivalents
(No Additional
RSUs Awarded)
($)(ii)
   Stock Awards
Total
($)
 

Peter Oppenheimer

   59,611,500     6,558,250     66,169,750  

Eduardo Cue

   39,741,000     8,234,262     47,975,262  

Jeffrey Williams

   59,611,500     6,658,300     66,269,800  

(i) Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs Awarded in 2012.In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown in Column (e) for 2012 include the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards during 2012. These values have been determined under the principles used to calculate the grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of the Company’s financial statements. As noted in “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, the Company’s recent practice has been to grant regular RSU awards to the named executive officers (other than the CEO) every two fiscal years, with limited exceptions for special cases, such as awards to new hires or in connection with promotions. As a result, the

33


compensation reported for each named executive officer will generally be comparatively high for the years in which the Company grants RSU awards to the officers and comparatively low for the years in which the Company does not grant RSU awards.

(ii) Accounting Charges due to RSU Modification to Provide Dividend Equivalents.The amounts shown in Column (e) for Peter Oppenheimer, Eduardo Cue and Jeffrey Williams in 2012 include the incremental fair value, computed in accordance with FASB Topic 718, of the modification of those officers’ RSUs on May 24, 2012 to provide for dividend equivalents. No additional RSUs were awarded as part of that modification.

 

(2)

As described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the named executive officers’ annual bonusescash incentives are based on the performance of the Company and the individual executiveApple relative to pre-determined objectives for the year.year, and the performance of the individual executive. The threshold, target, and maximum amounts for each named executive officer’s 2013 bonus2016 annual cash incentive opportunity are shown in the table entitled “Grants ofPlan-Based Awards—2013.2016.The Company exceeded the maximumIn 2016, Apple was below its target performance goals for both net sales and operating income, set by theresulting in a payout of each named executive officer’s annual cash incentive at 89.5% of target. The Compensation Committee determined that no downward adjustments would be made based on Apple’s or an individual’s performance and approved the payout for 2013. Accordingly, each named executive officer received the maximum payout of 200% of base salary under the performance-based bonus plan.for 2016.

 

(3)

This amount represents: (i) the Company’sApple’s contributions to Mr. Cook’s account under its 401(k) plan in the amount of $15,301;$15,900; (ii) Company-paid term life insurance premiums paid by Apple in the amount of $2,420; and$2,925; (iii) vacation cash-out in the amount of $35,000.$138,462; and (iv) security expenses in the amount of $220,432, which represents the incremental cost for personal security services provided to Mr. Cook as determined by allocating both direct costs and a percentage of fixed costs incurred by Apple and used to provide personal security services.

 

(4)

This amount represents: (i) the Company’sApple’s contributions to Mr. Oppenheimer’sMaestri’s account under its 401(k) plan in the amount of $15,300;$11,925; and (ii) Company-paid term life insurance premiums paid by Apple in the amount of $1,491.$1,561.

 

(5)

This amount represents: (i) Apple’s contributions to Ms. Ahrendts’ account under its 401(k) plan in the Company’samount of $7,950; (ii) term life insurance premiums paid by Apple in the amount of $1,561; (iii) relocation expenses in the amount of $49,253 and associated tax gross up for taxable relocation amounts in the amount of $53,742; and (iv) personal security expenses in the amount of $303.

(6)

This amount represents: (i) Apple’s contributions to Mr. Cue’s account under its 401(k) plan in the amount of $16,091;$15,900; and (ii) Company-paid term life insurance premiums paid by Apple in the amount of $1,491; and (iii) vacation cash-out in the amount of $13,462.$1,561.

 

(6)(7)

This amount represents: (i) the Company’sApple’s contributions to Mr. Riccio’s account under its 401(k) plan in the amount of $15,300;$15,900; and (ii) Company-paid term life insurance premiums paid by Apple in the amount of $1,491.$1,561.

 

(7)(8)

This amount represents: (i) the Company’sApple’s contributions to Mr. Williams’Sewell’s account under its 401(k) plan in the amount of $15,300;$15,900; and (ii) Company-paid term life insurance premiums paid by Apple in the amount of $1,491.$1,561.

CompensationThe amounts in the salary, bonus, and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of Named Executive Officers

The table entitledthe “Summary Compensation Table—2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011” above quantifies2014” reflect actual amounts paid for the value ofrelevant years, while the different forms of compensation of each named executive officer for services rendered during 2013, 2012, and 2011. The primary elements of each named executive officer’s total compensation shownamounts in the table are base salary, an annual bonus, and long-term equitystock awards consisting of RSUs. Named executive officers also received the other benefits listed in Column (g) of the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table—2013, 2012, and 2011,” as further described in the footnotes to the table. The Company does not have employment agreements or severance arrangements with any named executive officer.

The table entitled “Summary Compensation Table—2013, 2012, and 2011” should be read in conjunction with the following tables and narrative descriptions. The table entitled “Grants of Plan-Based Awards—2013” and the accompanying description provide information regarding the bonus opportunities awarded to named executive officers in 2013.column reflect accounting values. The tables entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at 20132016 Year-End” and “Option Exercises and Stock Vested—2013”2016” provide further information on the named executive officers’ potential realizable value and actual value realized with respect to their equity awards. The “Summary Compensation Table—2016, 2015, and 2014” should be read in conjunction with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the subsequent tables and narrative descriptions.

 

34Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 40


Grants of Plan-Based Awards—20132016

The following table shows information regarding the incentive awards granted to the named executive officers for 2013.2016.

 

   Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan  Awards
 

Name

(a)

  Threshold
($)(b)
   Target
($)(c)
   Maximum
($)(d)
 

Timothy Cook

   0     1,400,000     2,800,000  

Peter Oppenheimer

   0     875,000     1,750,000  

Eduardo Cue

   0     875,000     1,750,000  

Daniel Riccio

   0     875,000     1,750,000  

Jeffrey Williams

   0     875,000     1,750,000  
       

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

     

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

     

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of Shares

of Stock

or Units

(#)(i)

  

Grant Date

Fair Value
of Stock
and Option

Awards(1)

($)(j)

 

Name

(a)

 Award Type 

Grant Date

(b)

  

Threshold

($)(c)

  

Target

($)(d)

  

Maximum

($)(e)

     

Threshold

(#)(f)

  

Target

(#)(g)

  

Maximum

(#)(h)

      
             

Tim Cook

 

 Cash Incentive      3,000,000    6,000,000    12,000,000                        
Luca Maestri Cash Incentive      1,000,000    2,000,000    4,000,000                        
 Time-based RSUs  10/5/2015                              108,323    12,000,022  
 Performance-based RSUs  10/5/2015                 16,316    65,264    130,528         8,000,061  
Angela Ahrendts Cash Incentive      1,000,000    2,000,000    4,000,000                        
 Time-based RSUs  10/5/2015                              108,323    12,000,022  
 Performance-based RSUs  10/5/2015                 16,316    65,264    130,528         8,000,061  
Eddy Cue Cash Incentive      1,000,000    2,000,000    4,000,000                        
 Time-based RSUs  10/5/2015                              108,323    12,000,022  
 Performance-based RSUs  10/5/2015                 16,316    65,264    130,528         8,000,061  
Dan Riccio Cash Incentive      1,000,000    2,000,000    4,000,000                        
 Time-based RSUs  10/5/2015                              108,323    12,000,022  
 Performance-based RSUs  10/5/2015                 16,316    65,264    130,528         8,000,061  
Bruce Sewell Cash Incentive      1,000,000    2,000,000    4,000,000                        
 Time-based RSUs  10/5/2015                              108,323    12,000,022  
 Performance-based RSUs  10/5/2015                 16,316    65,264    130,528         8,000,061  

(1)

The grant date fair value for time-based RSUs is measured based on the closing fair market value of Apple’s common stock on the date of grant. The grant date fair value for performance-based RSUs is calculated based on a Monte-Carlo valuation of each award on the date of grant, determined under FASB ASC 718, incorporating the following assumptions:

      

Assumptions

Grant Date  

Performance

Period End Date

  

Expected Term

(years)

  Expected
Volatility
  Risk-Free
Interest Rate
10/5/2015  9/29/2018  2.98  26.91%  0.89%

Apple used its historical stock prices as the basis for the volatility assumptions. The risk-free interest rates were based on U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of grant. The expected term was based on the time remaining in the performance period on the grant date. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies found in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 41


Description of Plan-Based Awards

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards.Each of the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” shown in the table entitled “Grants of Plan-Based Awards—2013”2016” was granted under the 2003Apple’s 2014 Employee Stock Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which provides flexibility to grant non-equitycash incentive awards, (i.e., cash bonus opportunities), as well as equity awards. The material terms of the 20132016 non-equity incentive awards are described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the section entitled “The Role“Annual Cash Incentive.”

All Other Stock Awards. Each of Cash Compensation.”

No new RSU awards werethe time-based and performance-based RSUs shown in the table entitled “Grants of Plan-Based Awards—2016” was granted under, and is subject to, the named executive officers in 2013. The material terms of the Company’s equity incentive awards2014 Plan. The Compensation Committee administers the 2014 Plan.

Time-Based RSUs. The time-based RSUs granted on October 5, 2015 are scheduled to vest in three annual installments commencing on April 1, 2018. Vesting is generally contingent on each officer’s continued employment with Apple through the applicable vesting date.

Performance-Based RSUs. The performance-based RSUs granted on October 5, 2015 are scheduled to vest on October 1, 2018, subject to each officer’s continued employment with Apple through the vesting date and satisfaction of performance conditions for the performance period beginning on September 27, 2015 and ending on September 29, 2018. As described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the section entitled “The Role of Long Term“Other Named Executive Officers’ Long-Term Equity Awards.Awards,A detailed descriptionin each case, between 0% and 200% of the modificationtarget number of performance-based RSUs vest depending on Apple’s Relative TSR percentile compared to the other companies in the S&P 500 over the performance period, with 100% of the target RSUs vesting if Apple’s Relative TSR is at the 55th percentile. If Apple’s total shareholder return for the performance period is negative, the number of RSUs that vest is capped at 100% of target.

Dividend Equivalents. RSUs granted under the 2014 Plan have dividend equivalents, which entitle holders of RSUs to the same dividend value per share as holders of common stock. Dividend equivalents are subject to the same vesting and other terms and conditions as the corresponding unvested RSUs. Dividend equivalents are accumulated and paid when the underlying RSUs vest. At Mr. Cook’s 2011 RSU award is set forthrequest, none of his RSUs participate in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 23 in the section entitled “Determining Compensation for the Chief Executive Officer.”dividend equivalents.

 

35Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 42


Outstanding Equity Awards at 20132016 Year-End

The following table shows information regarding the outstanding equity awards (consisting of RSU awards) held by each of the named executive officers as of September 28, 2013.24, 2016.

 

     Stock Awards 

Name

(a)

 Grant Date
(b)
  Number of Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
(#)(c)
  Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested(1)
($)(d)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of Unearned
Shares, Units or Other
Rights That Have Not
Vested
(#)(e)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout Value
of Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not Vested
($)(f)(1)
 

Timothy Cook

  9/21/2010    125,000(2)   60,343,750    —     —   
  8/24/2011    520,000(3)   251,030,000    320,000(3)   154,480,000  

Peter Oppenheimer

  9/21/2010    100,000(2)   48,275,000    —     —   
  11/2/2011    75,000(4)   36,206,250    —     —   

Eduardo Cue

  9/26/2009    2,500(5)   1,206,875    —     —   
  10/5/2010    50,000(2)   24,137,500    —     —   
  9/2/2011    50,000(6)   24,137,500    —     —   
  11/2/2011    100,000(7)   48,275,000    —     —   

Daniel Riccio

  9/26/2009    3,750(5)   1,810,313    —     —   
  10/5/2010    5,625(8)   2,715,469    —     —   
  10/10/2011    12,500(9)   6,034,375    —     —   
  8/23/2012    75,000(10)   36,206,250    —     —   

Jeffrey Williams

  9/26/2009    3,750(5)   1,810,313    —     —   
  9/21/2010    100,000(2)   48,275,000    —     —   
  11/2/2011    75,000(4)   36,206,250    —     —   

Name

(a)

  

Grant Date

(b)

   

Number of Shares

or Units of Stock

That Have Not

Vested

(#)(c)

   

Market Value of

Shares or Units of

Stock That Have

Not Vested(1)

($)(d)

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other

Rights That Have

Not Vested

(#)(e)

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or Payout

Value of Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights That

Have Not Vested(1)

($)(f)

 
Tim Cook   8/24/2011     2,100,000(2)     236,691,000     1,400,000(2)     157,794,000  
Luca Maestri   3/4/2013     33,328(3)     3,756,399            
   10/7/2013     37,674(4)     4,246,237            
   5/29/2014     19,100(5)     2,152,761     7,749(5)(6)     873,390  
   10/17/2014     122,863(7)     13,847,889     68,576(7)(6)     7,729,201  
   10/5/15     108,323(8)     12,209,085     65,264(8)(6)     7,355,905  
Angela Ahrendts   5/1/2014     26,271(9)     2,961,004            
   5/1/2014     78,110(10)     8,803,778     40,229(10)(6)     4,534,211  
   10/17/2014     122,863(7)     13,847,889     68,576(7)(6)     7,729,201  
   10/5/15     108,323(8)     12,209,085     65,264(8)(6)     7,355,905  
Eddy Cue   3/3/2014     106,110(11)     11,959,658     44,912(11)(6)     5,062,032  
   10/17/2014     122,863(7)     13,847,889     68,576(7)(6)     7,729,201  
   10/5/15     108,323(8)     12,209,085     65,264(8)(6)     7,355,905  
Dan Riccio   3/3/2014     106,110(11)     11,959,658     44,912(11)(6)     5,062,032  
   10/17/2014     122,863(7)     13,847,889     68,576(7)(6)     7,729,201  
   10/5/15     108,323(8)     12,209,085     65,264(8)(6)     7,355,905  
Bruce Sewell   3/3/2014     106,110(11)     11,959,658     44,912(11)(6)     5,062,032  
   10/17/2014     122,863(7)     13,847,889     68,576(7)(6)     7,729,201  
   10/5/15     108,323(8)     12,209,085     65,264(8)(6)     7,355,905  

 

(1)

The dollar amounts shown in Columns (d) and (f) are determined by multiplying (x) the number of shares or units shown in Column (c) or (e), as applicable, by (y) $482.75 (the$112.71, the closing price of the Company’sApple’s common stock on September 27, 2013,23, 2016, the last trading day of the Company’sApple’s fiscal year).year.

 

(2)This RSU award is scheduled to vest in its entirety on September 21, 2014, provided that the officer continues to be employed with the Company through the vesting date.

(3)This RSU award was modified on June 21, 2013 to add performance criteria, as discussed under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the section entitled “Determining Compensation for the Chief Executive Officer.” Pursuant to the modification, 100,000

700,000 time-based RSUs subject to thethis award are scheduled to vest on each of August 24, 2016 and August 24, 2021, provided, that the officer continues to be employed with the CompanyApple through the applicable vesting date. The remaining 640,0002,800,000 time- and performance-based RSUs subject to thethis award are separated into eight equal tranches of 80,000 RSUs that are each scheduled to vest annuallyin five annual installments commencing on August 24, 2014,2017, assuming continued employmentthat the officer continues to be employed with Apple through the applicable vesting date and, with respect to a portion of each tranche,installment, satisfaction of applicable performance-based criteria.performance conditions.

 

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 43


(4)(3)

The remaining RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest in their entirety on March 21, 2016, provided4, 2017, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with the CompanyApple through the vesting date.

 

(5)The remaining(4)

12,558 RSUs subject to this award vested in their entirety on October 15, 2013.

(6)The2016, and the remaining RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest in their entiretytwo semi-annual installments commencing on August 24, 2015, providedApril 15, 2017, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with the CompanyApple through the applicable vesting date.

 

(7)This RSU(5)

The time-based RSUs subject to this award isare scheduled to vest 25%in two annual installments commencing on September 21, 2014, and the remaining 75% on September 21, 2016, providedMay 29, 2017, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with the CompanyApple through the applicable vesting date.

36


(8)One third of the remaining 10,694 performance-based RSUs subject to this award vested on October 15, 2013, one third1, 2016 (138% of the target number of performance-based RSUs) upon satisfaction of the performance condition above target.

(6)

The target number of performance-based RSUs is shown. As described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in each case, between 0% and 200% of the target number of performance-based RSUs vest depending on Apple’s Relative TSR compared to the other companies in the S&P 500 over the relevant performance period.

(7)

The time-based RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest in three annual installments commencing on April 15, 2014, and the final one third on October 15, 2014, provided1, 2017, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with Apple through the Companyapplicable vesting date. 68,576 performance-based RSUs are scheduled to vest on October 1, 2017, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with Apple through the vesting date.date and satisfaction of applicable performance conditions.

 

(8)

The time-based RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest in three annual installments commencing on April 1, 2018, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with Apple through the applicable vesting date. 65,264 performance-based RSUs are scheduled to vest on October 1, 2018, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with Apple through the vesting date and satisfaction of applicable performance conditions.

(9)20%

13,139 RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest on June 14, 2017, and 13,132 RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest on June 14, 2018, in each case, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with Apple through the applicable vesting date.

(10)

78,110 RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with Apple through the vesting date. 40,229 performance-based RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017, assuming that the officer continues to be employed with Apple through the vesting date and satisfaction of applicable performance conditions.

(11)

The time-based RSUs subject to this award are scheduled to vest in two annual installments commencing on April 1, 2017, assuming that the remainingofficer continues to be employed with Apple through the applicable vesting date. 87,578 performance-based RSUs subject to this award vested on October 15, 2013, and the rest1, 2016 (195% of the RSUs subject to this award vest 20% in semi-annual installments overtarget number of performance-based RSUs) upon satisfaction of the period ending October 15, 2015, provided that the officer continues to be employed with the Company through the vesting date.performance condition above target.

 

(10)One third of this RSU award is scheduled to vest on each of December 23, 2013, April 23, 2015 and August 23, 2016, provided that the officer continues to be employed with the Company through the vesting date.

Option Exercises and Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 44


Stock Vested—20132016

The following table shows information regarding the vesting during 20132016 of stock awardsRSUs previously granted to the named executive officers. No options were exercised by theany named executive officersofficer during 2013.2016.

 

   Stock Awards 

Name

(a)

  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)(b)
   Value
Realized on
Vesting(1)
($)(c)
 

Timothy Cook

   152,877     69,592,835  

Peter Oppenheimer

   75,000     31,837,500  

Eduardo Cue

   58,750     30,806,813  

Daniel Riccio

   20,000     11,045,119  

Jeffrey Williams

   86,250     38,222,325  
   Stock Awards 

Name

(a)

  

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#)(b)

   

Value Realized on

Vesting(1)

($)(c)

 
Tim Cook   1,260,000     136,117,800  
Luca Maestri   117,243     13,114,923  
Angela Ahrendts   218,916     21,669,865  
Eddy Cue   670,820     80,284,181  
Dan Riccio   338,320     38,919,456  
Bruce Sewell   670,820     75,674,681  

 

(1)

The dollar amounts shown in Column (c) above for stock awards are determined by multiplying the number of shares that vested by the per-sharesum of the per share closing price of the Company’sApple’s common stock on the vesting date and any dividend equivalents attributable to each such shares.share.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 45


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

As noted above, the Company doesWe generally do not have employment agreements orenter into severance arrangements with any of itsour named executive officers, and none of the Company does not maintain any otherequity awards granted to the named executive officers under Apple’s equity incentive plans or arrangements that provide for any named executive officer to receive cash severance or other cash paymentsacceleration in connection with a change in control or a termination of such officer’s employment, other than as noted below or in connection with death or disability.

As described under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Company and/section entitled “Other Benefits,” Ms. Ahrendts was provided a limited cash severance arrangement when she joined Apple. Within the first three years of her start date, if we terminate Ms. Ahrendts’ employment other than for “Cause” or if she resigns for “Good Reason,” we will pay her as severance the amount of her final base salary for the remainder of the three-year period in a single lump sum. Under this arrangement, the severance value declines to zero by May 1, 2017. In addition, the vesting of the RSUs awarded to Ms. Ahrendts to compensate her for her unvested equity at Burberry, where she previously served as Chief Executive Officer (the “Make Whole RSUs”), is accelerated if Apple terminates her employment other than for “Cause” or if she resigns for “Good Reason.” Had Ms. Ahrendts’ employment terminated on September 23, 2016, the last business day of Apple’s fiscal year, the estimated amount that she would have been entitled to under the cash severance arrangement would have been $597,260, and the estimated amount she would have been entitled to under the Make Whole RSUs would have been $2,961,004. “Cause” and “Good Reason” are defined in Ms. Ahrendts’ offer letter. “Cause” generally means an act of fraud or material dishonesty; gross misconduct; failure to follow the lawful direction of the CEO or Board; failure to perform material duties for Apple; or material breach of an Apple policy. “Good Reason” generally means a material change in duties or responsibilities; a change in controlthe reporting structure such that Ms. Ahrendts no longer reports to the CEO; a material change in primary work location; or a breach by Apple of the Company.any of its material commitments in connection with Ms. Ahrendts’ employment.

RSU awards granted under the 2003 Plan

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 46


Equity Acceleration upon Death or Disability

Time-Based RSUs. Time-based RSUs provide for partial accelerated vesting of the RSUs scheduled to vest on the next applicable vesting date following termination of employment due to disability and for full accelerated vesting upon death.

Performance-Based RSUs. Performance-based RSUs provide for a partial waiver of the service vesting condition upon the death or disability of the award recipient, but do not provide for acceleration in connection with a change in control. the number of shares that vest determined at the end of the performance period, based on actual performance results and the recipient’s dates of employment during the performance period.

The following table listsshows the estimated amounts that the named executive officers and the estimated amounts they would have become entitled to under the terms of all outstanding RSU awards granted to them under the 2003 PlanRSUs had their employment terminated due to either death or disability on September 27, 2013,23, 2016, the last business day of Apple’s fiscal year. The estimated values for performance-based RSUs are shown at the Company’s fiscal year ended September 28, 2013.maximum potential payout amounts.

Name    

Estimated Total Value of Equity

Acceleration upon Death(1)

($)

     

Estimated Total Value of Equity
Acceleration upon  Disability
(1)

($)

 
Tim Cook     270,871,096       38,070,282  
Luca Maestri     53,042,453       24,038,225  
Angela Ahrendts     60,163,584       31,472,351  
Eddy Cue     63,216,785       33,290,589  
Dan Riccio     63,216,785       33,290,589  
Bruce Sewell     63,216,785       33,290,589  

 

Name

Estimated Total  Value
of Equity Acceleration upon Death or Disability
($)(1)

Timothy Cook

68,590,086

Peter Oppenheimer

39,497,640

Eduardo Cue

27,794,814

Daniel Riccio

13,073,836

Jeffrey Williams

41,006,233

(1)

The dollar amounts are determined by multiplying the number of shares subject to the partially accelerated RSU awardsRSUs by $482.75$112.71 (the closing price of the Company’sApple’s common stock on September 27, 2013)23, 2016).

 

37Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 47


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONProposals

The following table shows information, asOverview of September 28, 2013, concerning shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans.

   Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights

(1)(2)(b)
   Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

   17,381,432(3)   140.32     30,333,895(4) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

   —      —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total equity compensation plans

   17,381,432(5)   140.32     30,333,895  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

(1)The weighted average exercise price is calculated based solely on the exercise prices of the outstanding options and does not reflect the shares that will be issued upon the vesting of outstanding awards of RSUs, which have no exercise price.

(2)The weighted-average remaining contractual term of the Company’s outstanding options as of September 28, 2013 was 1.1 years.

(3)This number includes 17,165,800 shares subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2003 Plan, of which 3,843,513 shares were subject to outstanding options and 13,322,287 shares were subject to outstanding RSU awards, and 215,632 shares subject to outstanding awards granted under the Director Plan, of which 211,698 shares were subject to outstanding options and 3,934 shares were subject to outstanding RSU awards.

(4)This number includes 28,326,463 shares available for issuance under the 2003 Plan, 1,831,149 shares reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 176,283 shares available for issuance under the Director Plan. Shares issued in respect of awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2003 Plan and the Director Plan count against the shares available for grant under the applicable plan as two shares for every share granted.

(5)This table does not include equity awards that have been assumed by the Company in connection with the acquisition of other companies. As of September 28, 2013, an additional 39,197 shares of the Company’s common stock were subject to outstanding stock options assumed in connection with acquisitions of other companies (with a weighted average exercise price of $70.52 per share). Shares issued in respect of these assumed awards do not count against the share limits of the 2003 Plan.

38


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended September 28, 2013. The information contained in this report shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or otherwise considered “filed” with the SEC, and such information shall not be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.

The Audit Committee consists of four members: Drs. Levinson and Sugar and Messrs. Campbell and Iger. All the members are independent directors under the Nasdaq and SEC audit committee structure and membership requirements. The Audit Committee has certain duties and powers as described in its written charter adopted by the Board. A copy of the charter can be found on the Company’s website at www.apple.com/investor.

The Audit Committee is responsible primarily for assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility of reviewing the financial information that will be provided to shareholders and others, appointing the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit department, evaluating the Company’s accounting policies and the Company’s system of internal controls that management and the Board have established, reviewing significant financial transactions, and overseeing enterprise risk management. The Audit Committee does not itself prepare financial statements or perform audits, and its members are not auditors or certifiers of the Company’s financial statements.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibility of appointing and reviewing the services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee carefully reviews the policies and procedures for the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm, including the scope of the audit, audit fees, auditor independence matters and the extent to which the independent registered public accounting firm may be retained to perform non-audit related services.

The Company maintains an auditor independence policy that bans its auditors from performing non-financial consulting services, such as information technology consulting and internal audit services. This policy mandates that the Audit Committee approve the audit and non-audit services and related budget in advance, and that the Audit Committee be provided with quarterly reporting on actual spending. This policy also mandates that the Company may not enter into auditor engagements for non-audit services without the Audit Committee’s express approval.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended September 28, 2013 with the Company’s management and Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (“EY”). The Audit Committee has also discussed with EY the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

The Audit Committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from EY required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding EY’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with EY its independence from the Company.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the financial statements referred to above be included in the Annual Report.

Members of the Audit Committee

Ronald Sugar (Chair)William CampbellRobert IgerArthur Levinson

39


OVERVIEW OF PROPOSALSProposals

This Proxy Statement contains 119 proposals requiring shareholder action. Proposal No. 1 requests the election of eight directors to the Board. Proposals No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4 request amendments of the Company’s Articles. Proposal No. 5 requests the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014. Proposal No. 6 requests that shareholders vote on a non-binding advisory resolution approving the Company’s executive compensation. Proposal No. 7 requests approval of the Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan. Proposals No. 8 through No. 11 are shareholder proposals. action:

Proposal No. 1 requests the election to our Board of the eight nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

Proposal No. 2 requests the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.

Proposal No. 3 requests that shareholders vote on an advisory resolution approving our executive compensation.

Proposal No. 4 requests that shareholders hold an advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation.

Proposals No. 5 through No. 9 are shareholder proposals.

Each proposal is discussed in more detail in the pages that follow.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 48


PROPOSAL NO.Proposal No. 1

 – Election of Directors

The Board has nominated directors Campbell,Bell, Cook, Drexler, Gore, Iger, Jung, Levinson, Sugar, and SugarWagner to be elected to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The Board has nominated each of the Company’s directors for re-election at the Annual Meeting.

At the Annual Meeting, proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of individuals than the eight nominees named in this Proxy Statement. Holders of proxies solicited by this Proxy Statement will vote the proxies received by them as directed on the proxy card or, if no direction is made, for the election of the Board’s eight nominees.

The term of any incumbent director who does not receive the affirmative vote of (1) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute a quorum, and has not earlier resigned, will end on the date that is the earlier of (a) 90 days after the date on which the voting results for the Annual Meeting are determined by the inspector of election, or (b) the date on which the Board selects a person to fill the office held by that director in accordance with Apple’s bylaws.

Each of the directors nominated by the Board has consented to serving as a nominee, being named in this Proxy Statement, and serving on the Board if elected. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will be elected to serve a one-year term. If any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders willmay vote for aany nominee designated by the present Board to fill the vacancy.

There are no family relationships among Apple’s executive officers and directors.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of directors Bell, Cook, Gore, Iger, Jung, Levinson, Sugar, and Wagner.

Vote Required

In accordance with the policy ofApple has implemented majority voting in uncontested director elections previously adopted by the Board, nominees receivingof directors. Accordingly, Apple’s bylaws provide that in an uncontested election of directors the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute thea quorum will be elected as directors to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Any nominee for election who does not receive the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the sharesis required to constitute the quorum will promptly submit in writing his or her irrevocable offer of resignation to the Secretary of the Company, subject only to the Board’s acceptance of that offer of resignation in accordance with the Board’s policies and procedures.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of directors Campbell, Cook, Drexler, Gore, Iger, Jung, Levinson, and Sugar.

OVERVIEW OF PROPOSALS NO. 2, NO. 3 AND NO. 4

Amendment of Articles of Incorporation

Proposals No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4 request amendments of the Company’s Articles to (i) facilitate the implementation of majority voting for the election of directors in an uncontested election by eliminating Article VII that relates to the term of directors and the transition fromelect a classified board of directors to the current declassified structure, which occurred in 2000 (Proposal No. 2); (ii) eliminate the Board’s “blank check” authority to issue preferred stock (Proposal No. 3); and (iii) establish a par value for the Company’s common stock of $0.00001 per share (Proposal No. 4).director.

 

40Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 49


The Company believes these proposed amendments of the Articles are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and therefore proposes that shareholders approve separate proposals for the separate amendments to the Articles.

Each amendment contemplated by Proposals No. 2 through 4 is not conditioned upon the approval of any of the other proposals. If one or more of the proposals is approved by the shareholders, the Company intends to file a certificate of amendment or a certificate of amended and restated articles with the California Secretary of State. The amendment will be effective on the date the certificate is filed with the California Secretary of State.

The description in this Proxy Statement of the proposed amendments of the Articles contemplated by Proposals No. 2 through 4 is qualified in its entirety by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the full text of the Articles, as amended and restated by the proposed amendment, assuming Proposals No. 2 through 4 are all approved, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A. For convenience of reference, a copy of the Company’s Articles showing the proposed amendments, with deleted text shown in strikethrough and added text shown as double-underlined, is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B.

PROPOSAL NO. 2

Eliminate Article VII, Relating to the Term of Directors and the Transition from a Classified Board of Directors to the Current Declassified Structure

The Company’s shareholders are being asked to approve the deletion of Article VII of the Articles in its entirety.

In connection with a shareholder proposal made at the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, the Company informed its shareholders that the Board had adopted a policy providing for majority voting for the election of directors in uncontested elections and that the Company would take steps to implement majority voting in its Articles and bylaws.

The implementation of majority voting requires shareholder approval of the deletion of Article VII, because Article VII is inconsistent with the provisions of California law relating to majority voting in an uncontested election of directors. Article VII currently includes the following provision relating to the term of directors:

“Commencing at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in fiscal year 2000, each director shall be elected to serve until the annual meeting of shareholders held in the following fiscal year or until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.”

This provision is contrary to the majority voting standard set forth in California law, the state where the Company is incorporated. Section 708.5 of the California Corporations Code provides that if an incumbent director fails to be elected by approval of the shareholders in an uncontested election of a corporation that has adopted majority voting, then the term of the incumbent director shall end on the date that is the earlier of 90 days after the date on which the voting results are determined pursuant to the California Corporations Code and the date on which the board of directors selects a person to fill the office held by that director.

Article VII also contains language relating to the Company’s transition from a classified board of directors to the current declassified structure, which occurred in 2000. This language currently reads:

“Through and until immediately prior to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in fiscal year 2000, the directors shall be divided into two classes, designated Class I and Class II, each consisting of one-half of the directors or as close an approximation as possible, and each director shall serve for a term running until the second annual meeting of shareholders succeeding his or her election and until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified; provided, however, that the terms of all directors shall expire at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in fiscal year 2000.”

41


The Company previously had a classified board of directors in which the directors were divided into two classes and only one class of directors was voted on at each annual meeting, with each director’s term running until the second annual meeting of shareholders succeeding his or her election and until his or her successor was duly elected and qualified. At the 2000 annual meeting of shareholders, the Company transitioned from its prior classified board of directors structure to the current declassified board of directors structure.

These transition provisions of Article VII are no longer necessary because the transition to a declassified board structure was completed at the 2000 annual meeting of shareholders, and eliminating these provisions will not change the Board’s current declassified structure. In addition, eliminating these provisions will avoid any confusion about the term of directors and the application of California Corporations Code Section 708.5 to the Company.

If Proposal No. 2 is approved, the Board will separately amend the Company’s bylaws at the meeting of the Board immediately following the Annual Meeting to adopt the majority voting standard set forth in California Corporations Code Section 708.5, and that standard will apply to future uncontested elections of directors.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 2.

PROPOSAL NO. 3

Eliminate the “Blank Check” Authority of the Board of Directors to Issue Preferred Stock

The Company’s shareholders are being asked to approve an amendment of the Articles that would eliminate the Board’s “blank check” authority to issue preferred stock by deleting Article IV in its entirety and amending Article III to read as follows:

“This corporation is authorized to issue one class of shares designated “Common Stock”. The number of shares of Common Stock that this corporation is authorized to issue is 1,800,000,000.”

This proposal would also eliminate Article VIII, which provides for a Certificate of Determination of preferences with respect to Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock. The Company has not issued shares of preferred stock since 1997, when it issued 150,000 shares of Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock. Those shares were redeemed in full shortly thereafter. Thus, it is no longer necessary for the Articles to include a certificate of determination of preferences for the Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock.

Article IV currently permits the Board to issue shares of preferred stock having voting, conversion and other rights to be determined by the Board in its sole discretion. This is referred to as “blank check” preferred stock because it does not require shareholder approval. When a board of directors retains the “blank check” authority to issue preferred stock, such a provision is typically viewed as an anti-takeover defense that a board of directors can use to frustrate a merger or acquisition transaction that could be viewed favorably by shareholders. Given the potential that the “blank check” authority to issue preferred stock could be misused as a takeover defense, the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to eliminate this “blank check” authority by deleting Article IV and revising Article III to reflect the deletion of Article IV.

This amendment does not preclude the Board from issuing preferred stock in the future. However, if the proposed amendment of the Articles is approved, any future issuances of preferred stock would require shareholder approval. The Board does not intend to issue preferred stock in the future absent shareholder approval.

42


Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 3 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 3.

PROPOSAL NO. 4

Establish a Par Value for the Company’s Common Stock of $0.00001 Per Share

The Company’s shareholders are being asked to approve an amendment of the Articles that would establish a par value for the Company’s common stock of $0.00001 per share. Currently, the Company’s common stock has no par value. Article III of the Articles would be amended to establish a par value for the common stock of $0.00001 per share. If Proposal No. 4 is approved (and Proposal No. 3 is not approved), Article III would read in its entirety:

“This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares designated respectively “Common Stock”, par value $0.00001 per share, and “Preferred Stock”. The number of shares of Common Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue is 1,800,000,000. The number of shares of Preferred Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue is 5,000,000.”

The Company anticipates that establishing a par value of $0.00001 per share will reduce corporate expenses and thus benefit shareholders. Under California law, which is the state in which the Company is incorporated, a corporation may have par or no par value stock. However, some other states impose qualification or licensing fees on foreign corporations to transact business in such states based on the authorized capital stock of a corporation. In certain states, the rates at which qualification or licensing fees are assessed differ, depending upon whether the shares of the corporation are with or without par value, with nominal par value shares in some cases being assessed at a lower rate than no par value shares. The Company believes that adopting a nominal par value for its shares will, in some cases, result in the Company being assessed qualification or licensing fees on a similar basis as other companies that also have a nominal par value for their shares.

Establishing a par value for the Company’s common stock will have no effect on any of the rights and privileges now possessed by holders of common stock. The Company does not expect that establishing a par value for the Company’s common stock will have any material accounting impact.

As discussed above, each of Proposals No. 2 through Proposal No. 4 is not conditioned upon the approval of any other proposals. However, if shareholders approve each of Proposals No. 3 and No. 4, such shareholder approval would cause Article III to read in its entirety:

This corporation is authorized to issue one class of shares designated “Common Stock” par value $0.00001 per share. The number of shares of Common Stock that this corporation is authorized to issue is 1,800,000,000.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 4 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 4.

43


PROPOSAL NO. 5

– Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

In November 2013, the Audit Committee completed the process it undertook in accordance with its previously announced policy to review the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm every five years. As a result of this process and following careful deliberation, theThe Audit Committee has re-appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’sApple’s independent registered public accounting firm and as auditors of the Company’sApple’s consolidated financial statements for 2014.2017. Ernst & Young LLP has served as the Company’sApple’s independent registered public accounting firm since its appointment in February 2009. The Audit Committee reviews the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm annually.

At the Annual Meeting, theour shareholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’sApple’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.2017. In the event of a negative vote on such ratification,this proposal, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. Even if this appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interestinterests of the CompanyApple and its shareholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to questions.

Fees Paid to Auditors

The following table shows the fees accrued or paid to the Company’sbilled by Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm for the years ended September 28, 201324, 2016, and September 29, 2012.26, 2015.

 

Ernst & Young  

2016

($)

     

2015

($)

 
Audit Fees(1)   13,537,500       12,414,100  
Audit-Related Fees(2)   653,000       636,800  
Tax Fees(3)   1,863,700       2,381,100  
All Other Fees(4)   62,200       50,000  
  Ernst & Young LLP   

 

     

 

 
  2013
($)
   2012
($)
 

Audit Fees(1)

   8,417,200     7,080,500  

Audit-Related Fees(2)

   462,800     378,800  

Tax Fees(3)

   495,600     225,300  

All Other Fees

   —       —   
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   9,375,600     7,684,600           16,116,400           15,482,000  
  

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Audit fees relate to professional services rendered in connection with the audit of the Company’sApple’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, quarterly review of financial statements included in the Company’sApple’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and audit services provided in connection with other statutory and regulatory filings.

 

(2)

Audit-related fees comprise fees forrelate to professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the worldwide audit or review of the Company’sApple’s financial statements.

 

(3)

Tax fees relate to professional services rendered in connection with tax audits, international tax compliance and internationalpreparation relating to tax returns, and tax audits, as well as for tax consulting and planning services.

(4)

All other fees relate to professional services not included in the categories above, including services related to other regulatory reporting requirements.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 50


Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services Performed by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The CompanyApple maintains an auditor independence policy that, bans its auditorsamong other things, prohibits Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm from performing non-financial consulting services, such as information technology consulting and internal audit services. This policy mandates that the Audit Committee approve in advance the audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm and the related budget, in advance, and that the Audit Committee be provided with quarterly reporting on actual spending. This policy also mandates that the CompanyApple may not enter into auditor engagements with Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm for non-audit services without the express pre-approval of the Audit Committee’s express approval.Committee. In accordance with this policy, the Audit Committee pre-approved all services to be performed by the Company’sApple’s independent registered public accounting firm.firm in 2016.

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 2.

 

44


Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 52 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute thea quorum.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 51


Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 5.

PROPOSAL NO. 6

3 – Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

The Company provides its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote to approve the compensation of its named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables) (a “say-on-pay proposal”). The Company believes it is appropriate to seek and take into account the views of shareholders on the design and effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program.

The Company’s goal for its executive compensation program is to attract, motivate, and retain a talented, entrepreneurial and creative team of executives who will provide leadership for the Company’s success in dynamic and competitive markets. The Company seeks to accomplish this goal in a way that rewards performance and is aligned with its shareholders’ long-term interests. The Company believes its executive compensation program, which emphasizes long-term equity awards, satisfies this goal and is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of its shareholders.

At the Company’s 2013 annual meeting of shareholders, approximately 61% of the votes cast supported the say-on-pay proposal. Prior to the 2013 annual meeting and continuing throughout the year, the Company engaged in outreach discussions with many of its largest shareholders. Ms. Jung, as Chair of the Compensation Committee, participated in a number of these discussions. In general, the shareholders supported the Company’s compensation practices and supported the Company’s proposal to attach performance criteria to a portion of the Company’s future equity awards to executive officers. Accordingly, the Company is committed to including performance criteria in a portion of the equity awards it grants to executive officers in the future. At Mr. Cook’s request, the Compensation Committee began this initiative in 2013 by amending his 2011 RSU award to include performance-based vesting conditions with no upside opportunity. The amendment placed more than $123 million of the original grant date fair value of the award at risk based on the Company’s performance (as explained in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis). The Company’s management continues to engage in an ongoing dialogue with shareholders.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 22 of this Proxy Statement, describes the Company’s executive compensation program and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2013 in more detail. Highlights of the Company’s executive compensation program include the following:

The Compensation Committee did not grant any equity awards to the named executive officers in 2013.

As discussed above, the Compensation Committee amended Mr. Cook’s 2011 RSU award to include performance-based vesting conditions with no upside opportunity. The Company is also committed to including performance criteria in a portion of the equity awards it grants to executive officers in the future.

The base salaries for each named executive officer other than Mr. Cook were increased in 2013 following the Company’s announcement of changes to the executive team to encourage even more

45


collaboration among the Company’s hardware, software, and services teams. The salary increases recognized the additional responsibilities assigned to the officers, as well as their exceptional individual performance, and were designed to maintain internal pay equity among the executive team.

The target and maximum bonus levels for each named executive officer remained the same at 100% and 200%, respectively, of each officer’s base salary. The Company exceeded the maximum performance goals for both net sales and operating income set by the Compensation Committee for 2013. Accordingly, each executive officer received the maximum payout of 200% of base salary under the performance-based bonus plan.

Despite the salary increases and the fact that the Company has the highest revenue, operating income, and market capitalization of any of the primary peer group companies, the target annual cash compensation for the named executive officers is significantly below the median for executives with similar positions at peer companies.

The Company has implemented stock ownership guidelines for Mr. Cook and the other named executive officers. Mr. Cook already satisfies the guidelines by owning shares of the Company’s stock equal to approximately 35 times his base salary.

At his request, Mr. Cook’s RSU awards do not participate in dividend equivalents.

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, our shareholders have the Board will requestopportunity to cast an annual advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables (a “say-on-pay proposal”).

Our executive compensation program is designed to be simple, effective, and link pay to performance. It reflects the size, scope, and success of Apple’s business, as well as the responsibilities of our named executive officers. We believe our compensation program appropriately rewards performance and is aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. We encourage shareholders voteto read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 28 of this Proxy Statement, which describes the details of our executive compensation program and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2016.

We had another year of strong financial results in 2016 with net sales of $215.6 billion and operating income of $60.0 billion. These two financial measures are used to evaluate executive performance under our annual cash incentive program. For 2016, these measures declined from our record-breaking 2015 levels, and were below the target performance goals set by the Compensation Committee. The annual cash incentives paid to our named executive officers for 2016 reflected these results with below-target payouts. While the annual cash incentives are intended to reward the achievement of short-term financial goals, our executive compensation program emphasizes and rewards results over the long-term through equity incentives that have a substantial performance-based component and multi-year vesting schedules. For 2017, we placed an even greater emphasis on long-term performance by increasing the performance-based component of our equity incentives to 50%. We have also implemented robust stock ownership guidelines that apply to all executive officers.

We value the feedback provided by our shareholders, who supported our executive compensation program at the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders with approximately 95% of votes cast. We have discussions with many of our shareholders on an ongoing basis regarding various corporate governance topics, including executive compensation, and take into account the views of shareholders regarding the design and effectiveness of our executive compensation program.

Shareholders are being asked to approve the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables), is hereby approved.

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Company, the Board or the Compensation Committee, and will not be construed as overruling a decision by the Company, the Board or the Compensation Committee or creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty for the Company,Apple, the Board, or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions expressed by shareholders in their votevotes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions regarding named executive officers.

The Company’s current policy is to provide shareholders with an opportunity to approve the compensation of the named executive officers each year at the annual meeting of shareholders. It is expected that the next suchsay-on-pay vote will occur at the 20152018 annual meeting of shareholders.

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 3.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 63 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute thea quorum.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 6.

46


PROPOSAL NO. 7

Approval of Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan

At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to approve the Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which was adopted, subject to shareholder approval, by the Board on November 19, 2013.

The Company currently maintains the 2003 Plan. As of November 11, 2013, a total of 20.615 million shares of the Company’s common stock were then subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2003 Plan, and an additional 16.608 million shares were then available for new award grants under the 2003 Plan.

If shareholders approve the 2014 Plan, no new awards will be granted under the 2003 Plan after the Annual Meeting. The number of shares that will initially be made available for award grants under the 2014 Plan will equal the number of shares that are available for award grants under the 2003 Plan on the date of the Annual Meeting plus an additional 55 million new shares. In addition, if shareholders approve the 2014 Plan, any shares subject to outstanding awards under the 2003 Plan that expire, are cancelled or otherwise terminate, or are withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations with respect to restricted stock units, at any time after the Annual Meeting will also be available for award grant purposes under the 2014 Plan. Shares issued in connection with awards that are granted by or become obligations of the Company through the assumption or substitution of awards in connection with an acquisition of another company will not count toward these limits, unless determined otherwise by the Company.

If shareholders do not approve the 2014 Plan, the Company will continue to have the authority to grant awards under the 2003 Plan. If shareholders approve the 2014 Plan, the termination of the Company’s grant authority under the 2003 Plan will not affect awards then outstanding under that plan.

Discussion of the Aggregate Share Limit

During the past decade, the Company’s investments in innovative design and engineering have resulted in the significant expansion of its product portfolio. The Company has also expanded its distribution capabilities by opening more than 400 of its own retail stores and substantially increasing third-party resale locations. The Company’s successful execution of its strategies has led to dramatic revenue and earnings growth. For example, in the five-year period from 2008 through 2013, the Company’s annual revenue grew from $32.5 billion to $170.9 billion, while its earnings grew from $4.8 billion to $37 billion. The Company’s success has also resulted in a significant increase in shareholder value. Between the Company’s last request for an increase in shares under the 2003 Plan on February 25, 2010 and September 28, 2013, the Company added more than $250 billion in market capitalization, an increase of approximately 237%. This compares to an increase of 53% in the S&P 500 index over the same period.

The Board believes the Company’s success is due to its highly talented employees and that future success depends on its ability to attract and retain high-caliber employees. The Company’s primary center for innovation is in the Silicon Valley, where it must compete with many successful and high profile companies for a limited pool of talented people. The Company’s ability to grant equity awards is a necessary and powerful recruiting and retention tool. Equity awards also enhance the link between shareholder and award holder interests.

The Compensation Committee, which administers the 2003 Plan and will administer the 2014 Plan, if approved, recognizes its responsibility to strike a balance between shareholder concerns regarding the potential dilutive effect of equity awards and the ability to attract, retain and reward employees whose contributions are critical to the Company’s long-term success. The 2003 Plan is currently the Company’s only employee equity plan under which awards may be granted other than its Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The current number of shares remaining available for grant under the 2003 Plan is expected to last until approximately the end of 2014, based on the recent historical rate of award grants under the 2003 Plan noted under “Specific Benefits” below, and taking into account the 2:1 premium share counting rule, discussed below, for certain equity awards.

47


The Compensation Committee anticipates that the additional shares requested, together with the shares remaining available for new award grants under the 2003 Plan and assuming usual levels of shares becoming available for new awards as a result of forfeitures of outstanding awards, will provide the Company with flexibility to continue to grant equity awards through approximately the end of 2017 (subject to adjustment based on the factors noted under “Specific Benefits” below and taking into account the 2:1 premium share counting rule, discussed below, for certain equity awards), accommodating anticipated grants relating to the hiring, retention and promotion of employees and providing reasonable flexibility for acquisitions.

To protect shareholder interests from the potential dilutive impact of equity awards, the Company actively manages its program to use its equity plan resources as effectively as possible. Equity awards are generally limited to (1) those positions deemed critical to the Company’s future success, (2) individuals whose personal performance makes them highly valuable to the Company, and (3) essential new hires. As a result, equity awards are generally granted to senior level individual contributors and management across all Company functions. For more information regarding the potential dilutive impact of the Company’s equity awards and the 2014 Plan, please see the discussion under “Specific Benefits” below.

It should also be noted that the Board authorized a share repurchase program in 2012. One goal of the program was to neutralize the impact of dilution from future employee equity grants and employee stock purchase programs. The program initially provided for the repurchase of up to $10 billion of the Company’s common stock that was expected to be executed over a three-year period beginning in 2013. The repurchase program was subsequently significantly increased to $60 billion. Through the end of 2013, the Company had already used $23 billion of the $60 billion for the repurchase of its common stock, which substantially offsets the dilutive impact of the shares proposed to be available for award grants under the 2014 Plan.

In order to further protect shareholder interests from the potential dilutive impact of equity awards, the Company intends to limit its average annual unadjusted burn rate through 2017 to approximately 1.50% of shares outstanding. For this purpose, the “unadjusted burn rate” for any one particular fiscal year means the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon exercise or payment, as the case may be, of the equity-based awards granted by the Company in that fiscal year divided by the Company’s weighted average total number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during that particular fiscal year. The burn rate is “unadjusted” because it is determined before giving effect to the 2:1 premium share counting rule, discussed below, for certain equity awards. Please see “Specific Benefits” below for more information regarding the Company’s equity awards and unadjusted burn rates over the last three fiscal years and to-date in 2014 (as of November 11, 2013). While this burn rate provision is included to help address shareholder considerations regarding dilution, the 1.50% number was set higher than the Company’s unadjusted burn rate for any of the Company’s past three fiscal years to provide some flexibility for the Company and recognize that additional share repurchases by the Company will, as a result of decreasing the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that are then issued and outstanding, cause the Company’s unadjusted burn rate to increase.

The Board approved the request for additional share authority under the 2014 Plan based in part on a belief that the number of shares currently available under the 2003 Plan does not give the Company sufficient authority and flexibility to adequately provide for future incentives beyond 2014. The Company also believes that adoption of the 2014 Plan is critical to attracting and retaining employees in a competitive labor market, which is essential to the Company’s long-term growth and success. The Board believes that the proposed 2014 Plan share limit reflects an appropriate balance between providing the Company with the flexibility to continue its equity award program over a multi-year period and shareholder dilution considerations.

Description of the 2014 Plan

The following is a summary of the principal features of the 2014 Plan. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the 2014 Plan. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2014 Plan. A copy of the 2014 Plan is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex C. The 2014

48


Plan is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and any shareholder who desires to obtain a copy of the 2014 Plan may do so by written request to the Company’s Secretary at 1 Infinite Loop, MS: 301-4GC, Cupertino, California 95014.

Share Reserve

Maximum Share Reserve. The maximum number of shares that may be issued or transferred pursuant to awards under the 2014 Plan will equal:

55 million shares, plus

the number of shares available for new award grants under the 2003 Plan on the date of the Annual Meeting (determined before giving effect to the termination of the authority to grant new awards under the 2003 Plan), plus

the number of any shares subject to stock options granted under the 2003 Plan and outstanding as of the date of the Annual Meeting which expire, or for any reason are cancelled or terminated, after that date without being exercised, plus

the number of any shares subject to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2003 Plan that are outstanding and unvested as of the date of the Annual Meeting which are forfeited, terminated, cancelled, or otherwise reacquired after that date without having become vested or that are exchanged or withheld by the Company or one of its subsidiaries after that date to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to the award (after giving effect to the 2:1 premium share counting ratio described below).

The maximum number of shares that may be issued or transferred pursuant to awards under the 2014 Plan as a result of applying the share limit formula described above will not exceed 109,477,000 shares, which is the sum of (i) the 55 million shares referred to above, plus (ii) the 16,608,000 shares available for new award grants under the 2003 Plan on November 11, 2013, plus (iii) the 3,361,000 shares subject to stock options previously granted and outstanding under the 2003 Plan as of November 11, 2013, plus (iv) two (2) times (the premium share counting ratio described below) the 17,254,000 shares subject to restricted stock and restricted stock units previously granted and outstanding under the 2003 Plan as of November 11, 2013).

2:1 Premium Share Counting Rule. Shares issued with respect to awards granted under the 2014 Plan other than stock options or stock appreciation rights are counted against the 2014 Plan’s aggregate share limit as two shares for every one share actually issued in connection with the award. For example, if 100 shares are issued with respect to a restricted stock unit award granted under the 2014 Plan, 200 shares will be counted against the 2014 Plan’s aggregate share limit in connection with that award.

Other Share Counting Rules. The following are other rules for counting shares against the applicable share limits of the 2014 Plan:

To the extent that an award is settled in cash or a form other than shares, the shares that would have been delivered had there been no such cash or other settlement willnot be counted against the shares available for issuance under the 2014 Plan.

To the extent that shares are delivered pursuant to the exercise of a stock appreciation right or stock option, the number of underlying shares to which the exercise related shall be counted against the applicable share limits, as opposed to the number of shares actually issued. For example, if a stock option relates to 1,000 shares and is exercised at a time when the payment due to the participant is 150 shares, then 1,000 shares shall be charged against the applicable share limits with respect to such exercise.

 

49


Except as otherwise provided below, shares that are subject to awards that expire or for any reason are cancelled or terminated, are forfeited, fail to vest, or for any other reason are not paid or delivered under the 2014 Plan will again be available for subsequent awards under the 2014 Plan. Any such shares subject to awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights will become available taking into account the 2:1 premium share counting rule, discussed above, for these types of awards. For example, if a 100 share restricted stock unit award is made under the 2014 Plan, the award would count as 200 shares against the 2014 Plan’s share limit after giving effect to the 2:1 premium share counting rule. If the award is later forfeited before it vests, the 200 shares that were originally counted against the 2014 Plan’s share limit would again be available for subsequent awards under the 2014 Plan.

Shares that are exchanged by a participant or withheld by the Company as full or partial payment in connection with any award other than an option or stock appreciation right, as well as any shares exchanged by a participant or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any award other than an option or stock appreciation right, will be available for subsequent awards under the 2014 Plan. Any such shares will become available taking into account the 2:1 premium share counting rule, discussed above, for these types of awards. For example, if a 100 share restricted stock unit award is made under the 2014 Plan, the award would count as 200 shares against the 2014 Plan’s share limit after giving effect to the 2:1 premium share counting rule. If the Company delivers 60 shares to the participant and withholds 40 shares to cover tax withholding obligations, 80 shares (the 40 that were withheld multiplied by two to give effect to the 2:1 premium share counting rule) would again be available for subsequent awards under the 2014 Plan.

Shares that are exchanged by a participant or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price of an option or stock appreciation right granted under the 2014 Plan, as well as any shares exchanged or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any option or stock appreciation right, willnot be available for subsequent awards under the 2014 Plan.

The Company may not increase the applicable share limits of the 2014 Plan by repurchasing shares of the Company’s common stock on the market (by using cash received through the exercise of stock options or otherwise).

Shares issued in connection with awards that are granted by or become obligations of the Company through the assumption of awards (or in substitution for awards) in connection with an acquisition of another company will not count against the shares available for issuance under the 2014 Plan unless determined otherwise by the Company, and such awards may reflect the original terms of the related award being assumed or substituted for and need not comply with other specific terms of the 2014 Plan.

Reduction of Maximum Individual Limits. The 2003 Plan currently limits the number of options and stock appreciation rights that may be granted to any individual during a fiscal year to 15,000,000 shares, and it limits the number of stock grants and restricted stock units that may be granted to any individual during a fiscal year to 5,000,000 shares (counting the shares on a 1-for-1 basis for this purpose). The Company is reducing these annual limits to 1,000,000 shares in the 2014 Plan (counting the shares for stock grants and restricted stock units on a 1-for-1 basis for this purpose). The Company does not anticipate granting any individual awards at this reduced level. The maximum has been set higher than the Company’s usual grant levels in order to provide flexibility.

Administration

The Compensation Committee will administer the 2014 Plan with respect to persons who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act and awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee or a separate committee of two or more directors of the Company appointed by the Board will administer the 2014 Plan with respect to all other persons and awards.

50Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 52


Eligibility, Limitations and TypesProposal No. 4 – Advisory Vote on Frequency of Awards Under the 2014 PlanSay-on-Pay Votes

The 2014 Plan permits the granting by the plan administrator of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock grants and restricted stock units, as well as cash bonus awards. Stock appreciation rights may be awardedAs described in combination with stock options or stock grants, and such awards shall provide that the stock appreciation rights will not be exercisable unless the related stock options or stock grants are forfeited.

Employees (including executive officers and directors who are also the Company’s employees) and consultants of the Company, and any parent or subsidiary of the Company are eligible to participate in the 2014 Plan. Non-employee directors are not eligible to participate. On September 28, 2013, the Company had approximately 80,300 full-time equivalent employees (including executive officers) who would have been eligible to participate in the 2014 Plan if it had been in effect as of that date; however, as notedProposal No. 3 above, the Company expects that it will only make award grants under the 2014 Plan to senior-level individual contributors and management. The Company currently does not make equity awards to consultants.

Stock Options

The plan administrator may grant nonstatutory stock options or incentive stock options (which are entitled to potentially favorable tax treatment) under the 2014 Plan. The plan administrator will determine the vesting schedule and number of shares covered by each stock option granted to a participant. The plan administrator may grant stock options with time-based vesting or vesting upon satisfaction of performance goals and/or other conditions. The stock option exercise price is determined at grant by the plan administrator and must be at least 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant (110% for incentive stock options granted to shareholders who own more than 10% of the total outstanding shares of the Company, its parent or any of its subsidiaries). Consistent with applicable laws, regulations and rules, payment of the exercise price of stock options may be made by cashless exercise or by any other form of payment approved by the Compensation Committee. The term of a stock option shall not exceed seven years from the date of grant. Dividend equivalent rights may not be granted on stock options awarded under the 2014 Plan.

Stock Grants

The plan administrator may award stock, subject to vesting conditions, under the 2014 Plan. Participants may be required to pay cash or other legal consideration to the Company at the time of a stock grant, but the 2014 Plan does not establish a minimum purchase price for shares awarded as stock grants. The plan administrator may award stock grants with time-based vesting or vesting upon satisfaction of performance goals and/or other conditions. When the stock grant award conditions are satisfied, then the participant will be vested in the shares and will have complete ownership of the shares. Dividends paid on unvested stock grants subject to performance-based vesting requirements will be subject to forfeiture or repayment, as the case may be, if the related performance-based vesting condition is not satisfied.

Restricted Stock Units

The plan administrator may award restricted stock units under the 2014 Plan. Participants are not required to pay any consideration to the Company at the time of grant of a restricted stock unit. The plan administrator may grant restricted stock units with time-based vesting or vesting upon satisfaction of performance goals and/or other conditions. The plan administrator may provide for dividend equivalents on restricted stock units awarded under the 2014 Plan based on the amount of dividends paid on outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock; provided that, as to any dividend equivalent rights granted in connection with an award of restricted stock units subject to performance-based vesting requirements, such dividend equivalents will be subject to the same performance-based vesting requirements as the restricted stock units to which they relate. When the participant satisfies the conditions of the restricted stock unit award, the Company may settle the award (including any related dividend equivalent rights) in shares, cash or any combination of both, as determined by the plan administrator, in its sole discretion, at the time of grant.

51


Stock Appreciation Rights

The plan administrator may grant stock appreciation rights under the 2014 Plan. The vesting schedule and number of shares covered by each stock appreciation right granted to a participant will be determined by the plan administrator. The plan administrator may grant stock appreciation rights with time-based vesting or vesting upon satisfaction of performance goals and/or other conditions. The exercise price of a stock appreciation right will be established by the plan administrator and may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, the participant will receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying (a) the difference between (i) the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise and (ii) the exercise price times (b) the number of shares with respect to which the stock appreciation right is exercised. Stock appreciation rights may be paid in cash, shares, or any combination of both, as determined by the plan administrator, in its sole discretion, at the time of grant. The term of a stock appreciation right shall not exceed seven years from the date of grant. Dividend equivalent rights may not be granted on stock appreciation rights awarded under the 2014 Plan.

Performance-Based Awards

Awards under the 2014 Plan may be made subject to performance conditions as well as time-vesting conditions. Such performance conditions may be established and administered in accordance with the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” thereunder. Performance-based awards that are payable in cash may also be granted under the 2014 Plan, provided that the maximum amount of compensation that may be paid to any one participant in any calendar year in respect of performance-based awards payable only in cash (exclusive of cash-settled restricted stock unit awards and cash-settled stock appreciation rights, which are subject to the applicable individual limits on these awards set forth above) is $10,000,000. The Company currently does not anticipate any individual awards at this level; it has been set higher than the Company’s usual maximum bonus levels in order to provide flexibility. Performance conditions under the 2014 Plan shall utilize one or more objective measurable performance goals as determined by the plan administrator based upon one or more factors, including: (i) operating income; (ii) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (iii) earnings; (iv) cash flow; (v) market share; (vi) sales or revenue; (vii) expenses; (viii) cost of goods sold; (ix) profit/loss or profit margin; (x) working capital; (xi) return on equity or assets; (xii) earnings per share; (xiii) total shareholder return; (xiv) price/earnings ratio; (xv) debt or debt-to-equity; (xvi) accounts receivable; (xvii) writeoffs; (xviii) cash; (xix) assets; (xx) liquidity; (xxi) operations; (xxii) intellectual property (e.g., patents); (xxiii) product development; (xxiv) manufacturing, production or inventory; (xxv) mergers and acquisitions or divestitures; (xxvi) individual performance objective(s); and/or (xxvii) stock price. Any criteria used may be measured, as applicable, (a) in absolute terms, (b) in relative terms (including but not limited to, the passage of time and/or against other companies or financial metrics), (c) on a per share and/or share per capita basis, (d) against the performance14A of the Company as a whole or against particular entities, segments, operating units or products of the Company and/or (e) on a pre-tax or after tax basis. Awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) may be granted under the 2014 Plan and determined without regard to performance goals and may involve the plan administrator’s discretion.

No Repricing

In no case (except due to an adjustment to reflect a stock split or other event referred to under “Adjustments” below, and except for any repricing that may be approved by shareholders) will the plan administrator (1) amend an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right to reduce the exercise price or base price of the award, (2) cancel, exchange, or surrender an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right in exchange for cash or other awards for the purpose of repricing the award, or (3) cancel, exchange, or surrender an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right in exchange for an option or stock appreciation right with an exercise or base price that is less than the exercise or base price of the original award.

52


Transferability of Awards

Except as described below, awards under the 2014 Plan generally are not transferable by the recipient other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and are generally exercisable, during the recipient’s lifetime, only by the recipient. Any amounts payable or shares issuable pursuant to an award generally will be paid only to the recipient or the recipient’s beneficiary or representative. The plan administrator has discretion, however, to establish written conditions and procedures for the transfer of awards to other persons or entities, provided that such transfers comply with applicable federal and state securities laws and are not made for value (other than nominal value or certain transfers to family members).

Corporate Transactions

Generally, and subject to limited exceptions set forth in the 2014 Plan, if the Company dissolves or undergoes certain corporate transactions such as a merger, business combination, or other reorganization, or a sale of substantially all of its assets, all awards then-outstanding under the 2014 Plan will terminate or be terminated in such circumstances, unless the plan administrator provides for the assumption, substitution or other continuation of the award.

Adjustments

As is customary in incentive plans of this nature, each share limitExchange Act and the number and kind of shares available under the 2014 Plan and any outstanding awards, as well as the exercise or purchase prices of awards, and performance targets under certain types of performance-based awards, are subject to adjustment in the event of certain reorganizations, mergers, combinations, recapitalizations, stock splits, stock dividends, or other similar events that change the number or kind of shares outstanding, and extraordinary dividends or distributions of property to the shareholders.

Amendment and Termination

The Board may amend the 2014 Plan at any time and for any reason, provided that any such amendment will be subject to shareholder approval to the extent required by applicable laws, regulations or rules. The Board may terminate the 2014 Plan at any time and for any reason. Unless terminated earlier by the Board, the 2014 Plan will terminate on November 19, 2023, subject to any extension that may be approved by the Board and the shareholders prior to or on such date. The termination or amendment of the 2014 Plan may not adversely affect any award previously made under the 2014 Plan.

Recoupment Policy

Awards granted under the 2014 Plan will be subject to any provisions of applicable law providing for the recoupment or clawback of incentive compensation, such as provisions imposed pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; the terms of any Company recoupment, clawback or similar policy in effect at the time of grant of the award; and any recoupment, clawback or similar provisions that may be included in the applicable award agreement.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a brief summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to awards granted under the 2014 Plan based on the federal income tax laws in effect on the date of this Proxy Statement. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not address all matters relevant to a particular participant based on his or her specific circumstances. The summary expressly does not discuss the income tax laws of any state, municipality, or non-U.S. taxing jurisdiction, or the gift, estate, excise (including the rules applicable to deferred compensation under Code Section 409A), or other tax laws other than federal income tax law. The

53


following is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of avoiding taxpayer penalties. Because individual circumstances may vary, the Company advises all participants to consult their own tax advisor concerning the tax implications of awards granted under the 2014 Plan.

A recipient of a stock option or stock appreciation right will not have taxable income upon the grant of the stock option or stock appreciation right. For nonstatutory stock options and stock appreciation rights, the participant will recognize ordinary income upon exercise in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares and the exercise price on the date of exercise. Any gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares generally will be a capital gain or loss.

The acquisition of shares upon exercise of an incentive stock option will not result in any taxable income to the participant, except, possibly, for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. The gain or loss recognized by the participant on a later sale or other disposition of such shares will either be long-term capital gain or loss or ordinary income, depending upon whether the participant holds the shares for the legally-required period (two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise). If the shares are not held for the legally-required period, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the lesser of (i) the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise and the exercise price, or (ii) the difference between the sales price and the exercise price.

For awards of stock grants, the participant will not have taxable income upon the receipt of the award (unless the participant elects to be taxed at the time of the stock is granted rather than when it becomes vested). The stock grants will generally be subject to tax upon vesting as ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of vesting less the amount paid for such shares (if any).

A participant is not deemed to receive any taxable income at the time an award of restricted stock units is granted. When vested restricted stock units (and dividend equivalents, if any) are settled and distributed, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of shares received less the amount paid for such restricted stock units (if any).

If the participant is an employee or former employee, the amount a participant recognizes as ordinary income in connection with any award is subject to withholding taxes (not applicable to incentive stock options) and the Company is allowed a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant. In addition, Code Section 162(m) contains special rules regarding the federal income tax deductibility of compensation paid to the Company’s chief executive officer and to certain of the Company’s other executive officers. The general rule is that annual compensation paid to any of these specified executives will be deductible only to the extent that it does not exceed $1,000,000. However, the Company can preserve the deductibility of certain compensation in excess of $1,000,000 if such compensation qualifies as “performance-based compensation” by complying with certain conditions imposed by the Code Section 162(m) rules (including the establishment of a maximum number of shares with respect to which awards may be granted to any one employee during one fiscal year).

Specific Benefits

The Company has not approved any awards that are conditioned on shareholder approval of the 2014 Plan proposal. The Company cannot currently determine the benefits or number of shares subject to awards that may be granted in the future to executive officers and employees (including employee directors) under the 2014 Plan because the Company’s equity award grants are discretionary in nature. If the proposed 2014 Plan had been in effect in 2013, the Company expects that its award grants for 2013 would not have been different from those actually made in that year under the 2003 Plan. No stock-based awards were granted to the named executive officers during 2013. For information regarding past award grants under the 2003 Plan, see the “Aggregate Past Grants Under the 2003 Plan” table below.

54


The following paragraphs include additional information to help assess the potential dilutive impact of the Company’s equity awards and the 2014 Plan.

The following table shows the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock that were subject to outstanding restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2003 Plan, that were subject to outstanding stock options granted under the 2003 Plan, and that were then available for new award grants under the 2003 Plan as of September 28, 2013 and as of November 11, 2013.

   As of
September 28,
2013

(in thousands)
   As of
November 11,
2013

(in thousands)
 

Shares subject to outstanding restricted stock unit awards

   13,322     17,254  

Shares subject to outstanding stock options

   3,844     3,361  

Shares available for new award grants

   28,326     16,608  

In this 2014 Plan proposal, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to restricted stock unit awards granted during any particular period or outstanding on any particular date is presented based on the actual number of shares of the Company’s common stock covered by those awards and before applying the 2:1 premium share countingrelated rules of the 2003 Plan andSEC, our shareholders have the Director Plan.opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. This Proposal No. 4 affords shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often we should include a say-on-pay proposal in our proxy materials for future annual shareholder meetings or any special shareholder meeting for which we must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting (a “say-on-pay frequency proposal”). Under this Proposal No. 4, shareholders may vote to have the say-on-pay vote every year, every two years, or every three years.

Our shareholders voted on a similar proposal in 2011 with the majority voting to hold the say-on-pay vote every year. We continue to believe that say-on-pay votes should be conducted every year so that our shareholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program.

As of September 28, 2013, a total of 17.421 million shares ofan advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on Apple, the Company’s common stock were subject to all outstanding awards granted underBoard, or the 2003 Plan and the Director Plan, as well as outstanding awards assumed by the Company in connection with acquisitions. Of the 17.421 million shares, 13.326 million shares were then subject to outstanding restricted stock unit awards and 4.095 million shares were then subject to outstanding stock options. These numbers exclude shares that employees may purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

As of November 11, 2013, a total of 20.873 million shares of the Company’s common stock were subject to all outstanding awards granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans (including the shares then subject to outstanding awards under the 2003 Plan and the Director Plan, as well as outstanding awards assumed by the Company in connection with acquisitions, but exclusive of shares that employees may purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan), of which 17.265 million shares were then subject to outstanding restricted stock unit awards and 3.608 million shares were then subject to outstanding stock options.

The weighted-average number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding in each of the last three fiscal years (reflected in thousands) is 924,258 shares issued and outstanding in 2011; 934,818 shares issued and outstanding in 2012; and 925,331 shares issued and outstanding in 2013. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding as of September 28, 2013 and November 11, 2013 (reflected in thousands) was 899,213 shares and 898,058 shares, respectively. The closing market price for a share of the Company’s common stock as of November 11, 2013 was $519.048 per share.

The total number of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to awards that the Company granted under the 2003 Plan over the last three fiscal years, and to-date (as of November 11, 2013) for 2014, are as follows:

6.663 million shares in 2011 (which was 0.72% of the weighted-average number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding in 2011), all of which were subject to restricted stock unit awards;

7.796 million shares in 2012 (which was 0.83% of the weighted-average number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding in 2012), all of which were subject to restricted stock unit awards;

55


5.635 million shares in 2013 (which was 0.63% of the weighted-average number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding in 2013), of which 8,000 shares were subject to stock option awards and 5.627 million shares were subject to restricted stock unit awards; and

5.995 million shares in 2014 (which was 0.67% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding as of November 11, 2013), of which 1,000 shares were subject to stock option awards and 5.994 million shares were subject to restricted stock unit awards.

As previously noted,Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee anticipatesand the Board value the opinions expressed by shareholders in their votes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of conducting a say-on-pay vote.

It is expected that the 55 million additional shares requested for the 2014 Plan (together with the shares available for new award grants under the 2003 Plannext vote on the Annual Meeting date and assuming usual levels of shares becoming available for new awards as a result of forfeitures of outstanding awards)say-on-pay frequency proposal will provide the Company with flexibility to continue to grant equity awards under the 2014 Plan through approximately the end of 2017, accommodating anticipated grants relating to the hiring, retention and promotion of employees and providing reasonable flexibility for acquisitions. However, this is only an estimate, in the Company’s judgment, based on current circumstances. The total number of shares that are subject to the Company’s award grants in any one year or from year-to-year may change based on any number of variables, including, without limitation, the value of the Company’s common stock (since higher stock prices generally require that fewer shares be issued to produce awards of a given grant date fair value, all else being equal), changes in competitors’ compensation practices or changes in compensation practices in the market generally, changes in the number of employees, changes in the number of directors and officers, the extent to which vesting conditions applicable to equity-based awards are satisfied, the number of shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights, acquisition activity and the need to grant awards to new employees in connection with acquisitions, the need to attract, retain and incentivize key talent, the type of awards the Company grants, and how the Company chooses to balance total compensation between cash and equity-based awards.

56


Aggregate Past Grants Under the 2003 Plan

As of November 11, 2013, awards covering 227.164 million shares of the Company’s common stock had been granted under the 2003 Plan. This number of shares includes shares subject to awards that expired or terminated without having been exercised or paid and became available for new award grants under the 2003 Plan. The following table shows information regarding the distribution of those awards among the persons and groups identified below, option exercises and restricted stock and restricted stock unit vesting prior to that date, and any option, unvested restricted stock and restricted stock unit holdings as of that date.

  STOCK OPTIONS  RESTRICTED STOCK/UNITS 

Name and Position

 Number of
Shares
Subject to
Past Option
Grants
  Number of
Shares
Acquired
On
Exercise
  

 

Number of Shares
Underlying Options as of
November 11, 2013

  Number of
Shares/Units
Subject to
Past Awards
  Number of
Shares/ Units
Vested as of
November 11,
2013
  Number of
Shares/ Units
Outstanding
and Unvested
as of
November 11,
2013
 
   Exercisable  Unexercisable    

Named Executive Officers:

       

Timothy D. Cook

Chief Executive Officer

  3,200,000    3,200,000    0    0    2,300,000    1,327,877    965,000  

Peter Oppenheimer

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

  1,366,672    1,366,672    0    0    1,100,000    925,000    175,000  

Eduardo Cue

Senior Vice President, Internet Software and Services

  448,000    448,000    0    0    380,000    180,000    200,000  

Daniel Riccio

Senior Vice President, Hardware Engineering

  234,249    234,249    0    0    255,000    166,250    88,750  

Jeffrey Williams

Senior Vice President, Operations

  250,000    250,000    0    0    410,000    235,000    175,000  

Total for all current Executive Officers (including the Named Executive Officers identified above):

  5,885,589    5,885,589    0    0    6,042,443    3,931,389    2,103,931  

Non-Executive Director Group:

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0  

Each other person who has received 5% or more of the options, warrants or rights under the 2003 Plan

  0    0    0    0    0    0    0  

All employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers or directors, as a group

  158,225,915    82,524,064    3,353,305    8,161    57,010,017    36,175,322    15,149,865  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  164,111,504    88,409,653    3,353,305    8,161    63,052,460    40,106,711    17,253,796  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 7 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and votingoccur at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority2023 annual meeting of the shares requiredshareholders.

Shareholders may cast their advisory vote to constitute the quorum.

57


Recommendation of the Board of Directorsconduct advisory votes on executive compensation every “1 Year,” “2 Years,” or “3 Years,” or “Abstain.”

The Board recommends a vote FORon Proposal No. 7.4 to hold say-on-pay votes every 1 YEAR (as opposed to 2 years or 3 years).

Vote Required

A plurality of the votes cast for Proposal No. 4 will determine the shareholders’ preferred frequency for holding an advisory vote on executive compensation. This means that the option for holding an advisory vote every 1 year, 2 years, or 3 years receiving the greatest number of votes will be considered the preferred frequency of the shareholders.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 53


PROPOSAL NO. 8Proposal No. 5 – Shareholder Proposal

Shareholder Proposal Entitled Board Committee on Human Rights

The CompanyApple has been advised that Mr. John Harrington, 1001 2ndthe National Center for Public Policy Research, 20 F Street, NW, Suite 325, Napa, CA 94559, who has indicated he is a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’s common stock, and Northstar Asset Management Inc., PO Box 301840, Boston, MA 02130,700, Washington, DC 20001, which has indicated it is a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’sApple’s common stock, intendintends to submit jointly the following proposal at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED: To amend Article IV of the By-Laws, by inserting after Section 4.1, a new Section 4.2.

Charitable Giving – Recipients, Intents and Benefits

Section 4.2. Board Committee on Human Rights. There is established a Board Committee on Human Rights,Whereas, in addition to review the implications of company policies, above and beyond matters of legal compliance, for the human rights of individuals in the US and worldwide, including assessing the impacts of company operations and supply chains on resources and public welfare in host communities.

The Board of Directors is authorized, by resolution, in its discretion and consistent with these By-Laws, the Articles of Incorporation and applicable law to: (1) select the members of the Board Committee on Human Rights, (2) provide said committee with funds for operating expenses, (3) adopt a charterproviding benefits to govern said Committee’s operations, (4) empower said Committee to solicit public input and to issue periodic reports to shareholders andsociety at-large, charitable contributions should enhance the public at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, including but not limited toimage of our company. Increased disclosure about these contributions would provide shareholders with better insight into our corporate giving strategy.

Resolved: The proponent requests that the company provide an annual report, omitting proprietary information and at reasonable cost, disclosing: the company’s standards for choosing recipients of company assets in the form of charitable contributions; the business rationale and purpose for each of the charitable contributions, if any; personnel participating in the decision to contribute; the benefits to society at-large produced by company contributions; and a follow-up report confirming the contribution was used for the purpose stated. The report should be published on the findings of the Board Committee, and (5) any other measures within the Board’s discretion consistent with these By-Laws and applicable law. Nothing herein shall restrict the power of the Board of Directors to manage the business and affairs of the Company. The Board Committee on Human Rights shall not incur any costs to the Company except as authorized by the Board of Directors.company’s website.

Supporting Statement

The proposed by-law would establishAbsent a separatesystem of accountability and transparency, some donated assets may be misused and potentially harm the company’s reputation and shareholder value. Current disclosure is insufficient to allow the company’s Board Committee on Human Rights, which would elevate board level oversight and governance regarding human rights issues raisedshareholders to evaluate the use of corporate assets by outside organizations.

For example, the company has donated to the Center for American Progress (CAP) – an openly left-wing organization that, as reported by the Company’s activitiesWashington Post, made statements the head of the Anti-Defamation League called “anti-Semitic and policiesborderline anti-Semitic.”

Many support CAP’s leftist policy work, many others do not. Most Americans would acknowledge that donating to an extremely ideological organization in this highly polarized political climate is controversial.

Also, while education advocates would likely applaud the company’s donations of iPads and provide a vehicleother equipment to fulfillschools through its ConnectED program, certain labor unions and their political allies would likely oppose the Board’s fiduciary responsibilities for oversight of these issues.company’s ConnectED donations to charter schools.

In recent yearsFurthermore, according to public reports, the Company has become embroiled in public controversies regarding the human rights implications of its products and supply chains, including but not limited to controversies relatedcompany donated to the Foxconn Technology Group, a supplierClinton Foundation. Public reports indicate that the FBI is investigating or has investigated that organization for possible public corruption. Media reports also strongly imply that individuals and corporations may have sought preferential treatment from government actors in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation has many supporters who would support the company’s donation, but it also has many detractors that would disapprove of many key items for Apple with facilities located in China and elsewhere. The proposed by-lawthis type of giving.

Fuller disclosure would establishprovide enhanced feedback opportunities from which our company could make more fruitful decisions. Corporate philanthropy should be transparent to better serve the vehicle of a Board Committee, but would leave the process of appointment and implementationinterests of the Committee to the full Board of Directors.”shareholders.

The Company’s

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 54


Apple’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 85

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 8.5.

Apple already provides detailed information about our core values and our most significant charitable contributions on our website atapple.com/diversity/creating-opportunities andapple.com/product-red. Apple’s largest charitable contributions, which are made only following extensive internal vetting and approval from one or more of our executive officers, focus on some of the most important issues facing our communities today. For example:

Apple supports the advancement of education. Apple has joined President Obama’s ConnectED initiative and pledged $100 million to bring technology and services into 114 underserved schools across the United States. Under this program, we are donating an iPad to every student, a Mac and iPad to every teacher, and an Apple TV to every classroom, as well as services and professional development for teachers. There are now more than 50,000 students learning, creating, and exploring on iPad through our ConnectED commitment, and 96% of those students are eligible for a free or reduced-price lunch program.

Apple supports health in the fight for an AIDS-free generation. When our customers buy (PRODUCT)RED Apple products, Apple contributes to the Global Fund to provide counseling, testing, and medical care to those most affected by the AIDS epidemic. So far, (PRODUCT)RED has raised over $360 million for the Global Fund, including nearly $120 million through Apple.

Apple supports inclusion and diversity. Apple has launched a multiyear, $40 million partnership with the Thurgood Marshall College Fund. The TMCF in turn creates opportunities for students from public and private historically black colleges and universities who are pursuing careers in the tech industry. Apple does not just give money to the TMCF; we work collaboratively with the fund to advance its goals. For example, Apple hired 33 students from these institutions as summer interns in 2016, and as part of the TMCF partnership, also hosted them for a weeklong immersion at Apple’s campus several months ahead of time to provide them with a foundation of Apple culture and values to help pave the way for a successful experience.

Apple publicly discloses detailed information about the cost and impact of these initiatives on our website.

Apple also supports many other organizations that share our core values, such as American Red Cross, The Conservation Fund, Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, Mercy Corps, National Center for Women & Information Technology, National Society of Black Engineers, and World Wildlife Fund. In September 2011, Apple implemented a matching gifts program where Apple matches employee contributions of money, Apple products, or volunteer time to eligible nonprofit organizations. In certain cases, Apple matches cash contributions on a 2-for-1 basis, such as in cases of natural disasters or other major humanitarian crises. Apple has contributed to more than 11,000 different charitable organizations through this matching gifts program.

Apple believes in leaving the world better than we found it. We actively support our communities through philanthropic activities. The requested report would do nothing to advance these philanthropic activities, and would provide immaterial incremental additional information. Apple believes it is better to focus our efforts on actively supporting our communities than to divert time and resources to the preparation of a report that would have limited value to shareholders.

For all of the reasons above, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 5.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 5 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute a quorum.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 55


Proposal No. 6 – Shareholder Proposal

Apple has been advised that Mr. Antonio Avian Maldonado, II is a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of Apple’s common stock, and Zevin Asset Management, 11 Beacon Street, Suite 1125, Boston, MA 02108, is a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of Apple’s common stock. Mr. Maldonado’s address will be supplied promptly upon oral or written request. Apple has been advised that Mr. Maldonado and Zevin Asset Management intend to submit jointly the following proposal at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED:

Shareholders request that the Board of Directors adopt an accelerated recruitment policy requiring Apple Inc. (the “Company”) to increase the diversity of senior management and its board of directors, two bodies that presently fail to adequately represent diversity and inclusion (particularly Hispanic, African American, Native American and other people of color).

Stockholder Supporting Statement

The tech industry is characterized by the persistent and pervasive underrepresentation of minorities and women in senior positions as detailed in a 2014 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission report. According to a USA Today analysis of 2014 Computing Research Association data, “[t]op universities turn out black and Hispanic computer science and computer engineering graduates at twice the rate that leading technology companies hire them.”1The Company is committedat an advantageous position to be a leader in promoting diversity in senior management and its board of directors, based on its size, breadth and position as one of the largest companies in the world.

Shareholders are concerned that low levels of diversity at the Company’s senior management and board level, as well as painstakingly slow improvements, are a business risk.

According to the highest standardsCompany’s website, “Diversity is critical to innovation and it is essential to Apple’s future.”2 Further, the Company has stated in multiple Proxy Statements that it is “committed to actively seeking out highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool from which board nominees are chosen.”3

Shareholders believe that companies with comprehensive diversity programs, and strong commitment to implementation, enhance their long-term value, reducing the Company’s potential legal and reputational risks associated with workplace discrimination and building a reputation as a fair employer. Equally, shareholders believe the varied perspectives of social responsibilitya diverse senior management and human rights wherever we doboard of directors would provide a competitive advantage in terms of creativity, innovation, productivity and morale, while eliminating the limitations of “groupthink”, as it would recognize the uniqueness of experience, strength, culture and thought contributed by each; strengthening its reputation and business. This is confirmed by McKinsey & Company, which found companies with highly diverse executive teams had higher returns on equity and earnings performance than those with low diversity, and a May 2014 study found gender diverse teams were better at driving “radical innovation”.4 “Diversity helps companies react more effectively to market shifts and new customer needs.”5

1http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/10/12/silicon-valley-diversity-tech-hiring-computer-science-graduates-african-american-hispanic/14684211/

2https://www.apple.com/diversity/

3 http://investor.apple.com/secfiling.cfm?filingid=1193125-14-8074&cik=320193

4Diversity Matters, McKinsey & Company, November 2011.

5Diversity wins!, McKinsey & Company, November 2011.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 56


Therefore, shareholders ask the Company to assist investors in evaluating the company’s effectiveness in meeting its commitment to equal opportunity and diversity in senior management and board of directors, in a meaningful way that would not cause the company to breach the assurances of confidentiality and privacy that it has made to its employees. Currently shareholders have insufficient information to determine if the company has been successful in expanding diversity.

We urge shareholders to vote FOR the proposal.

Apple’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 6

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 6.

Our ongoing efforts to increase diversity are much broader than the “accelerated recruitment policy” requested by this proposal, which is awarefocused only on Apple’s senior management and Board. At Apple, we take a holistic view of no other companyinclusion and diversity that doesincludes the varied perspectives of our employees as muchwell as app developers, suppliers, and anyone who aspires to safeguarda future in tech. We also support diversity by creating opportunities beyond Apple. Here are just a few examples:

Apple has joined President Obama’s ConnectED initiative and pledged $100 million to bring technology and services into 114 underserved schools across the United States. Under this program, we are donating an iPad to every student, a Mac and iPad to every teacher, and an Apple TV to every classroom, as well as services and professional development for teachers. There are now more than 50,000 students learning, creating, and exploring on iPad through our ConnectED commitment, 92% of whom are of Alaskan Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic, or Native American heritage.

Apple has been working with the National Center for Women & Information Technology for more than a decade, and in 2015, we became the first-ever lifetime partner with the NCWIT, expanding a joint commitment to help double the talent pool of women available for technology jobs by 2019. This commitment includes a new initiative targeted towards giving Latinas the inspiration to explore tech studies and careers.

Apple launched a multiyear, $40 million partnership with the Thurgood Marshall College Fund. The TMCF in turn creates opportunities for students from public and private historically black colleges and universities who are pursuing careers in the tech industry. Apple does not just give money to the TMCF; we work collaboratively with the fund to advance its goals. For example, Apple hired 33 students from these institutions as summer interns in 2016, and as part of the TMCF partnership, also hosted them for a weeklong immersion at Apple’s campus several months ahead of time to provide them with a foundation of Apple culture and values to help pave the way for a successful experience.

Apple publicly discloses information about our inclusion and empower workersdiversity initiatives and detailed statistics about our progress to date atapple.com/diversity. As disclosed on this dedicated website, our hiring trends over the last three years show steady progress in attracting more women and under-represented minorities (defined as the Company does today.groups whose representation in tech has been historically low — Black, Hispanic, Native American, Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islander). In addition, Apple is cultivating diverse leadership and tech talent through on-campus training, events, and programs.

The Company’s dedicated Supplier Responsibility team continually audits suppliersexamples above are evidence of the high level of support from our senior management of our holistic view of inclusion and diversity.

Our Board shares this commitment to increase diversity. Pursuant to its charter, the Nominating Committee of the Board actively seeks out highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool from which Board nominees are chosen. Our current eight-person Board includes two women and members of diverse ethnic groups.

The “accelerated recruiting policy” called for compliance with the Company’s industry-leading Supplier Codeby this proposal is not necessary or appropriate because we have already demonstrated our commitment to a holistic view of Conduct. The Supplier Code of Conduct is based on widely recognized international human rights principles as defined by the United Nationsinclusion and diversity and made detailed information about our inclusion and diversity initiatives, and the International Labor Organization.progress we have made with respect to these initiatives, available on our website

 

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 57


atapple.com/diversity. A substantially similar proposal was presented by Mr. Maldonado at the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders and received the support of less than 5% of votes cast. We believe that the low level of support for this proposal last year reflects the positive recognition by our shareholders of Apple’s significant commitment to inclusion and diversity.

For all of the reasons above, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 6.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 6 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute a quorum.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 58


Proposal No. 7 — Shareholder Proposal

Apple has been advised that Mr. James McRitchie, 9295 Yorkship Court, Elk Grove, CA 95758, who has indicated he is a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of Apple’s common stock, intends to submit the following proposal at the Annual Meeting:

Proposal 7 – Shareholder Proxy Access Amendments

RESOLVED: Shareholders of Apple, Inc. (the “Company”) ask the board of directors (the “Board”) to amend its “Proxy Access for Director Nominations” bylaw, and any other associated documents, to include essential elements for substantial implementation to better facilitate meaningful proxy access by more shareholders as follows:

  1. The number of “Shareholder Nominees” eligible to appear in proxy materials shall be 25% of the directors then serving or 2, whichever is greater. Current bylaws restrict Shareholder Nominees to 20% of directors. Under the current 8-member board, shareholder nominees are currently limited to nominating one. Any shareholder nominee elected under the current bylaws could be easily isolated.

  2. No limitation shall be placed on the number of shareholders that can aggregate their shares to achieve the 3% “Ownership Requirements” for “Eligible Shareholders.” Under current provisions, even if the 20 largest public pension funds were able to aggregate their shares, they would not meet the 3% criteria at most of companies examined by the Council of Institutional Investors. Allowing an unlimited number of shareholders to aggregate shares will facilitate participation by individuals and institutional investors in meeting the Ownership Requirements.

  3. No limitation shall be imposed on the re-nomination of “Shareholder Nominees” based on the number or percentage of votes received in any election. Such limitations do not facilitate the shareholders’ traditional state law rights and add unnecessary complexity.

Supporting Statement:

The SEC’s universal proxy access Rule 14a-11 (https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2010/33-9136.pdf) was vacated after a court decision regarding the SEC’s cost-benefit analysis. Therefore, proxy access rights must be established on a company-by-company basis. Subsequently, Proxy Access in the United States: Revisiting the Proposed SEC Rule (http://www.cfapubs.org/doi/pdf/10.2469/ccb.v2014.n9.1) a cost-benefit analysis by CFA Institute, found proxy access would “benefit both the markets and corporate boardrooms, with little cost or disruption,” raising US market capitalization by up to $140.3 billion. Public Versus Private Provision of Governance: The Case of Proxy Access (http://ssrn.com/abstract=2635695) found a 0.5 percent average increase in shareholder value for proxy access targeted firms.

Proxy Access: Best Practices

(http://www.cii.org/files/publications/misc/08_05_15_Best%20Practices%20-%20Proxy%20Access.pdf) by the Council of Institutional Investors, “highlights the most troublesome provisions” in recently implemented proxy access bylaws.

Although the Company’s Supplier Codeboard adopted a proxy access bylaw in 2015, it contains troublesome provisions, as outlined above, that significantly impair the ability of Conduct,shareholders to participate as Eligible Shareholders, the ability of Shareholder Nominees to effectively serve if elected, and the ability of Shareholder Nominees to run again if they receive less than 25% of the vote. Adoption of all the requested amendments would largely remedy these issues and would better ensure meaningful proxy access by more shareholders.

Increase shareholder value

Vote for Shareholder Proxy Access Amendments – Proposal 7

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 59


Apple’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 7

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 7.

Our current corporate governance framework reflects our commitment to robust, balanced governance practices combined with responsiveness and accountability to shareholders. Our existing proxy access bylaws, which Apple proactively adopted in 2015 and further enhanced in 2016, establishes a prudent and effective mechanism for proxy access, making adoption of this proposal unnecessary and unwarranted.

In 2015, after careful consideration of the varying viewpoints and feedback offered by many shareholders, the Board amended Apple’s bylaws to adopt proxy access. The bylaws permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of Apple’s outstanding shares of common stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in Apple’s annual proxy materials director nominees constituting up to 20% of the Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the procedural and eligibility requirements specified in the bylaws. The Board currently consists of eight directors, and shareholders may nominate one proxy access candidate.

But we did not stop there. After initially amending our bylaws to provide for proxy access, we continued to closely monitor proxy access developments and reach out to many of our largest shareholders, governance experts, and advisors to discuss evolving market practice and trends and the preferences of our shareholders. As a result of these engagements, in December 2016, the Board adopted enhancements to Apple’s bylaws to streamline our proxy access framework and make it easier for shareholders to nominate proxy access candidates. These enhancements included the following changes:

Apple no longer requires shareholders who nominate a proxy access candidate to recall loaned shares and hold them through the annual meeting. Ownership of loaned shares is deemed to continue if the shareholder(s) has the power to recall the loaned shares on five business days’ notice.

Apple increased the availability of proxy access by limiting the circumstances under which the maximum number of proxy access candidates is reduced. For example, Apple no longer reduces the number of proxy access candidates when an incumbent director was nominated through proxy access in the last two years and is subsequently supported by the Board for re-election.

Shareholders may now re-nominate a proxy access candidate regardless of the level of support received at the annual meeting. This change renders moot the amendment requested in point 3 of the proposal.

Apple has extended the deadline by which nominating shareholders and proxy access candidates must provide certain information to Apple to ten business days from five business days.

Apple has narrowed the scope of a nominating shareholder’s indemnification obligations to legal and regulatory violations arising out of a nominating shareholder’s actions or communications with Apple shareholders or out of information provided by a nominating shareholder to Apple.

Apple has limited the discretion of the Board to unilaterally interpret the proxy access provisions.

We believe our proxy access framework strikes the right balance between promoting shareholder nomination rights and protecting the interests of our shareholders. Our framework is a reasonable, usable one that reinforces the Board’s accountability and provides broad discretion to shareholders to nominate candidates of their choosing, while mitigating the risk of misuse of proxy access, including utilization by shareholders pursuing objectives that are not broadly supported by other shareholders. Implementation of the changes requested by the proposal beyond those Apple has already made would make Apple an outlier among public companies that have adopted proxy access.

Beyond mere proxy access, Apple’s bylaws also keep directors accountable to shareholders by providing for an automatic termination of service of any incumbent director who fails to be elected by an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented and voting in an uncontested election. Some companies merely require a director to submit a resignation letter

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 60


under similar circumstances, and give the board of directors discretion as to whether to accept the resignation – potentially allowing the director to remain on the board indefinitely. Apple believes that our process, which results in automatic termination of the director’s term, fosters greater accountability and responsiveness to shareholders.

The Board has also shown an ongoing commitment to board refreshment and to having highly qualified directors who bring diverse perspectives to the Board’s decision-making processes. Through the Board’s robust director nomination and annual self-evaluation process, two new directors have been added since 2014.

We are committed to ensuring effective, balanced corporate governance while also continually engaging with shareholders. This is evidenced by Apple’s proactive adoption of proxy access in 2015 and shareholder-favorable enhancements in 2016, and by the other actions Apple has taken to ensure that shareholders are given a voice, many of which are described in this Proxy Statement. The Board believes that these objectives are being achieved through Apple’s current governance processes and that changing our proxy access framework as outlined by the proponent is therefore unnecessary and unwarranted.

For all of the reasons above, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 7.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 7 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute a quorum.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 61


Proposal No. 8 – Shareholder Proposal

Apple has been advised that Mr. Jing Zhao, 262 Altadena Circle, Bay Point, CA 94565, who has indicated he is a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of Apple’s common stock, intends to submit the following proposal at the Annual Meeting:

Shareholder Proposal on Executive Compensation Reform

Resolved: shareholders recommend that Apple Inc. engage multiple outside independent experts or resources from the general public to reform its executive compensation principles and practices.

Supporting Statement

According to Apple Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, “Since 2014, the Compensation Committee has engaged the services of Pay Governance LLC,… on matters for which the Compensation Committee is responsible.” (p.26). However, any single consulting firm cannot represent the general public, such as independent scholars, think tanks, unions and academic societies, to advise fair, just and ethical compensation principles. The failure of our executive compensation principles and practices is clearly shown in the same $1,000,000 salary, the same $20,000,105 stock award and the same $4,000,000 non-equity incentive plan compensation each in 2015 to our five of six named executive officers (p.35). What is use of the Compensation Committee when it could not differentiate the contribution of the tremendously different functions of the CFO, the Retail and Online Stores SVP, the Internet Software and Services SVP, the Hardware Engineering SVP and the Secretary of our company?

As Professor Thomas Piketty (Capital in the Twenty- First Century, trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014) stated, “there is absolutely no doubt that the increase of inequality in the United States contributed to the nation’s financial instability.” (p.297) “Let me return now to the cause of rising inequality in the United States. The increase was largely the result of an unprecedented increase in wage inequality and in particular the emergence of extremely high remunerations at the summit of the wage hierarchy, particularly among top managers of large firms.” (p.298) “Because it is objectively difficult to measure individual contributions to a firm’s output, top managers found it relatively easy to persuade boards and stockholders that they were worth the money, especially since the members of compensation committees were often chosen in a rather incestuous manner.” (p.510)

For the purpose of this proposal, the Board and the Compensation Committee have the flexibility to select multiple independent experts or sources.

Apple’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 8

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 8.

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, and retain a talented, entrepreneurial, and creative team of executives who will provide leadership for Apple’s success in dynamic and competitive markets. Internal pay equity among our executive officers does not demonstrate a failure of compensation principles and practices; rather, it is a hallmark of the team-based approach of our executive compensation program. Our executive officers are expected to operate as a high-performing team, and we believe that generally awarding the same base salary, annual cash incentive, and long-term equity awards to each of our executive officers, other than the CEO, successfully supports this goal.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 62


Apple’s Compensation Committee is responsible for Apple’s compensation and incentive plans and programs, approves all compensation for Apple’s executive officers, and acts as the administrative committee for Apple’s employee equity plans. The Compensation Committee consists entirely of independent directors who have various resources and tools at their disposal to assist in the performance of their duties without the addition of multiple outside independent experts or resources from the general public whose priorities and interests may differ from those of Apple or our shareholders.

Under the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee has the right, in its sole discretion, at any time to retain or obtain advice, reports, or opinions from such internal and external counsel, compensation consultants, and other experts and advisors as it deems necessary or appropriate to assist it in the full performance of its functions. For many years, the Compensation Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant, and has engaged the services of Pay Governance since 2014. Pay Governance works with the Compensation Committee to develop effective executive pay programs based on its knowledge of Apple’s industry and business needs. Pay Governance provides advice to the Compensation Committee on a range of external market factors, including evolving compensation trends, appropriate peer companies, and market survey data. Pay Governance also provides general observations about our compensation programs and management recommendations regarding the amount and form of compensation for our executive officers.

Each year, the Compensation Committee conducts a review of Apple’s executive compensation program and takes into account numerous factors, including the advice of its independent compensation consultant, management recommendations, pay practices and program designs at peer companies, shareholder feedback, and the Compensation Committee’s own business judgment, which is informed by the significant experience of its members. Shareholders also have an opportunity each year to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, the results of its auditing efforts, a listwhich the Compensation Committee considers each year when reviewing our executive compensation program. We believe the alignment of our executive compensation program with the Company’s leading suppliers, and additional informationinterests of shareholders is reflected by the fact that approximately 95% of votes cast on the Company’s Supplier Responsibility program are available at www.apple.com/supplierresponsibility.

The Company’s auditing program has expanded in breadth and depth over the past several years. In January 2012, the Company became the first electronics company to be granted membership in the Fair Labor Association (the “FLA”), a leading non-profit organization dedicated to protecting the rights of workers. The FLA’s independent auditors have unrestricted access to any facility in the Company’s supply chain at any time.

In addition to monitoring and driving improvements for workers in the supply chain, the Company places strong emphasis on education and worker empowerment initiatives. The Company has established a training program for new employeesour say-on-pay proposal at the Company’s suppliers2016 annual meeting of shareholders voted to inform themapprove the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

Apple believes this Proposal No. 8 is unnecessary, not consistent with market practice, and would provide no benefit to Apple or our shareholders. The Compensation Committee already has extensive knowledge and resources at its disposal to establish appropriate executive compensation principles and practices for Apple that are aligned with the interests of their individual rights, local laws and the Company’s Supplier Code of Conduct. Millions of workers have participated in this training program.our shareholders.

The Company also partners with educational institutions to offer free college-level courses to workers who make the Company’s products. Hundreds of thousands of workers have attended these classes since 2008, and many have gone on to earn associate’s degrees. The Company recently expanded this educational program to offer more opportunities for participants to work toward a bachelor’s degree.

The Company is also active in protecting human rights and upholding its social responsibilities as they relate to its own employees throughout the world. The Company encourages a creative, culturally diverse and supportive work environment, and does not tolerate harassment or discrimination. To support the Company’s culture of inclusion, all employees are expected to respect the diverse ideas, experiences and backgrounds of all with whom we do business. In December 2013 the Company was awarded its 12th consecutive perfect rating from the Human Rights Campaign’s annual Corporate Equality Index, which scores businesses based on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender workplace policies, and won the title of “Best Places to Work for LGBT Equality.”

The Board does not believe that establishing a committee is an effective way for the Company’s practices and goals to continually evolve and improve in response to changing conditions. Instead, such an additional and redundant committee would distract the Board from its other responsibilities to the Company and its shareholders, while adding little value to the Company’s existing commitment to human rights and social responsibility. The Company’s existing governance framework has produced a strong commitment to human rights and progress that is evident in the Company’s practices and policies.

For all of the reasons above, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 8.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 8 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares.

Recommendationshares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the Board

The Board recommendsshares required to constitute a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 8.quorum.

 

59Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 63


PROPOSAL NO.Proposal No. 9 – Shareholder Proposal

Shareholder Proposal Entitled Report on Company Membership and Involvement with Certain Trade Associations and Business Organizations

The CompanyApple has been advised that The National Center for Public Policy Research, 501 Capital Court N.E.Mr. Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Ave., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20002, which2M, Great Neck, NY 11021, who has indicated ithe is a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’sApple’s common stock, intends to submit the following proposal at the Annual Meeting:

“STOCKHOLDER [sic] PROPOSAL

Proposal 9 – Executives To Retain Significant Stock

REGARDING A REPORT ON COMPANY MEMBERSHIP AND INVOLVEMENT WITH CERTAIN TRADE ASSOCIATIONS AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Resolved:Shareholders of Apple, [sic] Inc. (“Apple”) urge the board of directors (the “board”) to authorize the preparation ofthat our executive pay committee adopt a report, updated annually, disclosing:

1.Apple’s membership in any trade association or organization that educates members about sustainability practices, assists members in the development of sustainability practices, encourages members to engage in sustainability practices or requires members to undertake sustainability actions.

2.Payments made by Apple to trade associations or organizations of which Apple is a member that meet any of the definitions set forth in #1, above.

3.Registration with, membership in or subscription to any independent sustainability rating processes, registries and/or organizations to which Apple makes payments that rate Apple products for sustainability purposes and intentionally make results of such evaluations, in whole or in part, available to the public.

4.The amount of payments made by Apple to entities that meet any of the definitions set forth in #3, above.

The report, excluding proprietary information and information related to legal compliance, shall be presented to the Audit and Finance Committee of the board or other relevant oversight committees of the board and posted on Apple’s website.

For purposes of this proposal, “sustainability” refers to practices relating to the conservation of energy or physical resources; “trade association” refers to, as defined by Merriam-Webster, “an association of tradesmen, businessmen, or manufacturers in a particular trade or industry for the protection and advancement of their common interests”; “independent” refers to organizations or entities not owned or wholly controlled by Apple or by any government body or agent thereof; “payments” refers to fees paid for membership, subscription or registration purposes to sustainability ratings organizations or their parent organizations or agents and does not refer to nor include fees paid to news media organizations, including trade publications, their parent companies or agents, or any payments made solely for advertising purposes.

Supporting statement:

Some trade associations and business organizations have expanded beyond the promotion of traditional business goals and are lobbying businesspolicy requiring senior executives to pursue objectives with primarily social benefits. This may affect Company profitabilityretain a significant percentage of stock acquired through equity pay programs until reaching normal retirement age and shareholder value.

The Company’s involvement and acquiescence in these endeavors lacks transparency, and publicly-available information about the Company’s trade association memberships and related activities is minimal. An annualto report to shareholders will helpregarding the policy before our Company’s next annual meeting. For the purpose of this policy, normal retirement age would be an age of at least 60 and be determined by our executive pay committee. Shareholders recommend a share retention percentage requirement of 75% of net after-tax shares.

This single unified policy shall prohibit hedging transactions for shares subject to this policy which are not sales but reduce the risk of loss to the executive. Otherwise our directors might be able to avoid the impact of this proposal. This policy shall supplement any other share ownership requirements that have been established for senior executives, and should be implemented without violating current company contractual obligations or the terms of any current pay or benefit plan.

Requiring senior executives to hold a significant portion of stock obtained through executive pay plans would focus our executives on our company’s long-term success. A Conference Board Task Force report stated that hold-to-retirement requirements give executives “an ever-growing incentive to focus on long-term stock price performance.”

Please vote to protect shareholder value.”

value:

Executives To Retain Significant Stock – Proposal 9

60


The Company’sApple’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 9

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 9.

The CompanyApple believes that selective participation in trade associationsour long-term success depends largely on our ability to attract and business organizations isretain a high-performing executive team. Experienced personnel in the best intereststechnology industry are in high demand, and competition for executive talent is intense. A policy that would require senior executives to hold 75% of the Company and its shareholders. The Companynet after-tax shares from their equity awards until reaching normal retirement age is constantly monitoring and reviewing its participation and membership in associations and initiatives, and believes the reporting that would be required by this proposal is not necessary to protect shareholder value.

Participation in trade organizations can provide significant benefits to the Company and its shareholders. For example, participation in a trade organization may be an effective way to support specific policy initiatives or positions the Company believes will be in its best interests. The Company carefully chooses which organizations to join and chooses only those that advance the Company’s business interests.

The proposal alleges that some trade associations are lobbying business executives to pursue objectives with primarily social benefits. This isexcessive, not consistent with the Company’s experience. Trade associations generally act on behalf of their members’ interests, rather than lobbying their own members as the proposal suggests.

The Company may pay membership or other fees to trade organizations from time to time. But the Company’s existing Political Contributionscurrent practice among our peer groups, and Expenditures Policy does not permit trade association fees paid by the Company to be used to make political contributions. The Political Contributionswould put Apple at a competitive disadvantage for recruiting and Expenditures Policy also requires that the Company’s management annually report the Company’s memberships and participation in trade organizations to the Company’s Board. The Political Contributions and Expenditures Policy is published on the Company’s website.

The Company believes the report that would be required by Proposal No. 9 would be potentially misleading to the shareholders and the public because it would not necessarily reflect the Company’s views. Disclosure of the Company’s participations in trade associations could also impact the Company’s competitiveness by highlighting the Company’s priorities and strategic interests.

The Company also obtains ratings for its products and joins product registries when it determines these actions are in the Company’s best interests. The Company constantly reviews and assesses ratings organizations and their processes to ensure that they are aligned with the Company’s standards and business interests.retaining talented executives.

The Board believes that the Company’s current disclosure policies and other internal policies are sufficientCompensation Committee is the governing body best suited to manage the issues outlinedformulate Apple’s executive compensation policies. As described in the proposal.Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our executive compensation program emphasizes long-term shareholder value creation by using both time-based and performance-based RSUs to deliver long-term compensation incentives. The Board alsoCompensation Committee believes this is the most effective way to attract and retain a talented executive team and align executives’ interests with those of shareholders. As a result, Apple’s executive compensation program is weighted considerably toward long-term equity awards rather than cash compensation and our executives hold significant unvested RSUs at any particular time. The Compensation Committee believes that producingthis practice creates a substantial retention incentive, encourages our executives to focus on Apple’s long-term success, and aligns with the report requestedlong-term interests of our shareholders.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 64


Apple already has robust stock ownership guidelines for the CEO, the executive officers, and the Non-Employee Directors. Under the guidelines, Mr. Cook is expected to own shares of Apple common stock that have a value equal to ten times his base salary. This stock ownership requirement is among the highest of any CEO in the Fortune 100. Within five years after first becoming subject to the guidelines, each executive officer is expected to own shares of Apple common stock that have a value equal to three times the executive officer’s base salary and each Non-Employee Director is expected to own shares of Apple common stock that have a value equal to five times the annual cash retainer for serving as a director.

In addition to stock ownership guidelines, Apple maintains other significant governance policies relating to Apple stock held by executives. These include an anti-hedging policy for all employees and a prohibition against short sales of Apple common stock by executive officers and directors. Moreover, RSUs granted to executives are subject to the recoupment provisions of Apple’s standard forms of RSU agreement, which provide that Apple may recover any shares or other amounts obtained from RSUs in the event the executive commits a felony while employed by Apple, or engages in a breach of confidentiality, commits an act of theft, embezzlement or fraud, or materially breaches any agreement with Apple while employed by Apple or at any time thereafter.

Apple believes this Proposal No. 9 is unnecessary and would not be an effective wayprovide no benefit to protect shareholder value.Apple or our shareholders. Apple’s current executive compensation program and governance practices already create a substantial retention incentive and encourage Apple’s executives to focus on Apple’s long-term business objectives, stock price performance, and shareholders’ interests.

For all of the reasons above, the Board recommends a vote againstAGAINST Proposal No. 9.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 9 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute thea quorum.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 9.

 

61Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 65


PROPOSAL NO. 10

Shareholder Proposal of a Non-Binding Advisory Resolution Relating to the Company’s Capital Return Program

The Company has been advised that High River Limited Partnership (“High River”), 767 Fifth Avenue, 46th Floor, New York, New York, 10153, a record holder of 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, intends to submit the following proposal at the Annual Meeting on behalf of itself and Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund II LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund III LP, and other beneficial owners, including Mr. Carl Icahn:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders hereby approve, on an advisory basis, High River’s proposal that Apple commit to completing not less than $50 billion of share repurchases during Apple’s fiscal year ending September 27, 2014 (and increase the amount authorized for share repurchases under its Capital Return Program accordingly).”

The Company’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 10

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 10.

The Board and management team are thoughtfully considering options for returning additional cash to shareholders and are currently seeking input from shareholders as part of the Company’s regular review.

The Company’s success stems from the Company’s unique ability to combine world-class skills in hardware, software and services to deliver innovative products that create new markets and delight hundreds of millions of customers. This success has created tremendous value for the Company’s shareholders.

With breakthrough products and services such as the Mac, iPod, iPhone, iPad and App Store, the Company has created huge market opportunities, and the Board and management team believe the opportunities that lie ahead are just as exciting. Given such large and global markets, the Company competes with large companies around the world, many with their own significant technical capabilities and significant capital. This dynamic competitive landscape and the Company’s rapid pace of innovation require unprecedented investment, flexibility and access to resources.

Successfully innovating and executing against these large opportunities also requires careful stewardship by the Board and management team, and the Company’s evaluation of capital return is conducted in the context of supporting the Company’s continued business success and desire to deliver attractive returns to long-term shareholders.

The Board and management team have demonstrated a strong commitment to returning capital to shareholders over the past two years. In March 2012, the Company announced a quarterly dividend and share repurchase program totaling $45 billion. In April 2013, the Board authorized a dramatic increase, more than doubling the size of the program to $100 billion, raising the dividend, and increasing the share buyback authorization to $60 billion. As such, the Company is one of the largest dividend payers in the world and has the largest share repurchase authorization in history. The Company has executed aggressively against the capital return program, spending $23 billion of the $60 billion share repurchase authorization in fiscal 2013 alone. These share repurchases have been funded in part by a $17 billion debt offering, the largest ever as of the time of issuance.

In the first six quarters of the capital return program, dividend payments and share repurchases totaled over $43 billion. Dividends and share repurchases must be funded by domestic cash, and the Company has returned to shareholders or invested all of the domestic cash generated by its business and raised through the issuance of debt since the beginning of the program.

62


While the Board and management oppose this shareholder proposal, they are fully committed to returning cash to shareholders. The Board and management team believe that capital should be returned to shareholders on an efficient and sustained basis, and that the evaluation of capital return should be performed regularly and carefully with the best long-term interest of the business and shareholders in mind.

The Company is updating perspectives on its capital return program for 2014 and beyond. The Company is collecting input from a very broad base of shareholders, believing that the input of all shareholders is important and should be considered holistically. The evaluation of the capital return program continues to be thoughtful, deliberate, and consistent with a conservative financial policy that supports risk-taking and innovation. Consistent with its pattern for the last two years, the Company is on track to complete its regular review and thorough analysis and to announce any changes to the current program by March or April of 2014.

The Board believes that the Company’s management team and Board are in the best position to determine what is in the best long-term interest of the Company’s business and recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 10 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute the quorum.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 10.

PROPOSAL NO. 11

Shareholder Proposal Entitled Proxy Access for Shareholders

The Company has been advised that James McRitchie, 9295 Yorkship Court, Elk Grove, CA 95758, who has indicated he is a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of the Company’s common stock, intends to submit the following proposal at the Annual Meeting:

“Proposal 11—Proxy Access for Shareholders

WHEREAS, more than 10% of Apple Inc. shareholders voted against the re-election of three directors in 2013.

The business case for boardroom diversity runs deep, with studies finding higher returns on sales, invested capital and equity. Yet, Apple’s board consists of seven white males and one Chinese-American woman, all aged 52 [sic] to 72 [sic].Other Matters

Apple continues to face a litany of legal issues: possible worker rights violations at suppliers, anti-competitive practices, consumer class-action lawsuits, anti-trust probes, and consumer privacy concerns. Yet, Apple lacks a board committee responsible for these issues.

Activist corporate raiders have offered creative ideas aimed at capturing the cash horde, but not enhancing long-term returns.

It is time to “think different” by allowing shareowners to be heard on the board.

63


RESOLVED, Shareowners ask our board, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to amend our governing documents to allow shareowners to make board nominations as follows:

1. The Company proxy statement, form of proxy, and voting instruction forms shall include, listed with the board’s nominees, alphabetically by last name, nominees of:

a. Any party of one or more shareowners that has collectively held, continuously for two years, at least one percent but less than five percent of the Company’s securities eligible to vote for the election of directors, and/or

b. Any party of shareowners of whom 25 or more have each held continuously for one year a number of shares of the Company’s stock that, at some point within the preceding 60 days, was worth at least $2,000 and collectively at least one percent but less than five percent of the Company’s securities eligible to vote for the election of directors.

2. For any board election, no shareowner may be a member of more than one such nominating party. Board members and officers of the Company may not be members of any such nominating party of shareowners.

3. Parties nominating under 1(a) may collectively, and parties nominating under 1(b) may collectively, make nominations numbering up to 24% of the company’s board of directors. If either group should exceed its 24% limit, opportunities to nominate shall be distributed among parties in that group as evenly as possible.

4. If necessary, preference among 1(a) nominators will be shown to those holding the greatest number of the Company’s shares for at least two years, and preference among 1(b) nominators will be shown to those with the greatest number who have each held continuously for one year a number of shares of the Company’s stock that, at some point within the preceding 60 days, was worth at least $2,000.

5. Nominees may include in the proxy statement a 500 word supporting statement.

6. Each proxy statement or special meeting notice to elect board members shall include instructions for nominating under these provisions, fully explaining all legal requirements for nominators and nominees under federal law, state law and the company’s governing documents.

Vote to protect and enhance shareholder value:

Proxy Access for Shareholders—Proposal 11”

The Company’s Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 11

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 11.

The Company’s Nominating Committee assists the Board in identifying qualified individuals to become directors, including considering candidates proposed by shareholders. In identifying nominees, the Committee considers, among other things, a candidate’s independence, character, ability to exercise sound judgment, diversity, age, demonstrated leadership, skills, including financial literacy, and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Board believes that the Board and the Nominating Committee are best situated to assess the particular qualifications of potential director nominees and determine whether they will contribute to an effective Board that addresses the evolving needs of the Company and represents the best interests of the Company’s shareholders. The Board believes that providing access to the Company’s proxy as set forth in the proposal will undermine the value to the Company’s shareholders of the selection and nomination process undertaken by the Nominating Committee and the Board.

Members of the Board and the Nominating Committee have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Board is also accountable to the Company’s shareholders through the Company’s corporate governance documents and policies, including having all directors elected annually by the

64


shareholders. Instead of this system of accountability, the proposal would provide for access to the Company’s proxy by individual shareholders or relatively small groups of shareholders who do not have a similar fiduciary duty, are not bound by the Company’s corporate governance policies and practices, and may nominate directors who advance their own specific agenda without regard to the best interests of the Company or its shareholders.

The Company also believes that the proposal is unnecessary because the Nominating Committee already considers candidates proposed by shareholders and evaluates them using the same criteria as for other candidates.

With respect to the proponent’s specific proposal, the Board believes that the proposed thresholds for proxy access are inappropriately low and not in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders. In particular, the thresholds in the proposal would provide access to shareholders with an extremely limited interest in the Company, relative to the overall size of the Company and the total number of shareholders. The thresholds in the proposal would only require that (i) one or more shareholders own at least 1% of the outstanding shares of the Company for a minimum of two years continuously, or (ii) a group of 25 or more shareholders each own at least $2,000 of the Company’s shares for one year continuously.

These low thresholds do not demonstrate a significant and sustained long-term commitment to the Company sufficient to justify the costs and disruption of this kind of broadly available access to the Company’s proxy statement. Further, the low thresholds could result in the inclusion of multiple proxy access nominees in the Company’s proxy materials, leading to significant additional expense and diversion of the Board’s and management’s time and energy supporting the Board’s nominees in contested elections.

For all of the reasons above, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 11.

Vote Required

Approval of Proposal No. 11 requires the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting and (ii) a majority of the shares required to constitute the quorum.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal No. 11.

OTHER MATTERS

An eligible shareholder has separately notified us of his intent to present the Floor Proposal (described above) at the Annual Meeting. If approved, the Floor Proposal would, among other things, ask the Board “to enact a policy to use technical methods and other best practices to protect user data.” The Company knows of no other matters to be submitted to the shareholders at the Annual Meeting, other than the proposals referred to in this Proxy Statement and the possible submission of the Floor Proposal.

The Floor Proposal was not submitted under Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and the shareholder did not seek to have the Floor Proposal included in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, the Floor Proposal may be presented at the meeting but is not included in this Proxy Statement. If the Floor Proposal is presented at the Annual Meeting, then to the extent permitted by applicable rules, the proxy holders will have, and intend to exercise, discretionary voting authority under Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act to vote AGAINST the Floor Proposal. If any other matters properly come before the shareholders at the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named on the proxy to vote the shares represented thereby on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

Dated: January 10, 2014

 

65Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 66


ANNEX A

AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF APPLE INC.


AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATIONAudit and Finance Committee Report

OFThe Audit and Finance Committee consists of four members: Ron Sugar, who serves as the Chair of the Committee, James Bell, Art Levinson, and Sue Wagner. Each member is an independent director under NASDAQ, NYSE, and SEC audit committee structure and membership requirements. The Audit and Finance Committee has certain duties and powers as described in its written charter adopted by the Board. A copy of the charter is available on Apple’s website at

APPLE INC.investor.apple.com/corporate-governance.cfm

I.

The nameAudit and Finance Committee assists the Board’s oversight and monitoring of:

Apple’s financial statements and other financial information provided by Apple to its shareholders and others;

compliance with legal, regulatory, and public disclosure requirements;

the independent auditors, including their qualifications and independence;

Apple’s system of internal controls, including the internal audit function;

treasury and finance matters;

enterprise risk management, privacy, and data security; and

the auditing, accounting, and financial reporting process generally.

The Audit and Finance Committee does not itself prepare financial statements or perform audits, and its members are not auditors or certifiers of Apple’s financial statements.

The Audit and Finance Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the corporation is Apple Inc.

II

The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activitywork performed by Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP. In fulfilling its oversight responsibility, the Audit and Finance Committee carefully reviews the policies and procedures for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of California other than the banking business, the trust company business or the practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California Corporations Code.

III

This corporation is authorized to issue one class of shares designated “Common Stock,” par value $0.00001 per share. The number of shares of Common Stock that this corporation is authorized to issue is 1,800,000,000.

IV

Section 1. Limitation of Directors’ Liability. The liabilityengagement of the directors of this corporation for monetary damages shall be eliminated toindependent registered public accounting firm, including the fullest extent permissible under California law.

Section 2. Indemnification of Corporate Agents. The corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of agents (as defined in Section 317scope of the California Corporations Code) through bylaw provisions, agreements with agents, vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, in excess of the indemnification otherwise permitted by Section 317 of the California Corporations Code, subject only to the applicable limits set forth in Section 204 of the California Corporations Code with respect to actions for breach of duty to the corporation and its shareholders.

Section 3. Repeal or Modification. Any repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of this Article IV by the shareholders of this corporation shall not adversely affect any right or protection of an agent of this corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification.

V

There shall be no right with respect to shares of stock of this corporation to cumulate votes in the election of directors.

A-1


ANNEX B

MARKED COPY OF

AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF APPLE INC.


AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

APPLE INC.

I

The name of the corporation is Apple Inc.

II

The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of California other than the banking business, the trust company business or the practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California Corporations Code.

III

This corporation is authorized to issuetwo classesone class of shares designatedrespectively “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock.”,” par value $0.00001 per share. The number of shares of Common Stockwhichthat this corporation is authorized to issue is 1,800,000,000.The number of shares of Preferred Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue is 5,000,000.

IV

The Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. The Board of Directors is authorized to fix the number of shares of any series of Preferred Stock and to determine the designation of any such series. The Board of Directors is further authorized to determine or alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued series of Preferred Stock and, within the limits and restrictions stated in any resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors originally fixing the number of shares constituting any series, to increase or decrease (but not below the number of shares of each series outstanding) the number of shares of any such series subsequent to the issuance of shares of that series.

VIV

Section 1. Limitation of Directors’ Liability. The liability of the directors of this corporation for monetary damages shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California law.

Section 2. Indemnification of Corporate Agents. The corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of agents (as defined in Section 317 of the California Corporations Code) through bylaw provisions, agreements with agents, vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, in excess of the indemnification otherwise permitted by Section 317 of the California Corporations Code, subject only to the applicable limits set forth in Section 204 of the California Corporations Code with respect to actions for breach of duty to the corporation and its shareholders.

Section 3. Repeal or Modification. Any repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of this Article VIV by the shareholders of this corporation shall not adversely affect any right or protection of an agent of this corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification.

B-1


VIV

There shall be no right with respect to shares of stock of this corporation to cumulate votes in the election of directors.

VII

Through and until immediately prior to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in fiscal year 2000, the directors shall be divided into two classes, designated Class I and Class II, each consisting of one-half of the directors or as close an approximation as possible, and each director shall serve for a term running until the second annual meeting of shareholders succeeding his or her election and until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified; provided, however, that the terms of all directors shall expire at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in fiscal year 2000. Commencing at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in fiscal year 2000, each director shall be elected to serve until the annual meeting of shareholders held in the following fiscal year or until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.

VIII

The Certificate of Determination of Preferences of Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock, filed on August 6, 1997, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby incorporated by reference as Article VIII.

B-2


EXHIBIT A

CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF PREFERENCES OF

SERIES A NON-VOTING CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

AS FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ON AUGUST 6, 1997

B-3


Conformed Copy as filed with the Secretary of State

of the State of California on August 6, 1997

CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF

PREFERENCES OF SERIES A NON-VOTING CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

OF APPLE COMPUTER, INC.

The undersigned, John B. Douglas, III, and Paul D. Carmichael, hereby certify that:

1. They are a duly elected Senior Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Apple Computer, Inc., a California corporation (the “Corporation”).

2. The Corporation hereby designates one hundred and fifty thousand (150,000) shares of Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock.

3. None of the shares of the Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock have been issued.

4. Pursuant to authority given by the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has duly adopted the following recitals and resolutions:

WHEREAS, the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation provide for a class of shares known as Preferred Stock, issuable from time to time in one or more series; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation is authorized within the limitations and restrictions stated in the Restated Articles of Incorporation to determine or alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed on any wholly unissued series of Preferred Stock, to fix the number of shares constituting any such series, and to determine the designation thereof; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation has not issued any shares of Preferred Stock, and the Board of Directors of this Corporation desires to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions relating to this initial series of Preferred Stock, and the number of shares constituting said series, and the designation of said series;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT

RESOLVED: That the President and the Secretary of this Corporation are each authorized to execute, verify and file a certificate of determination of preferences with respect to the Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

RESOLVED FURTHER: That the Board of Directors hereby determines the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions relating to said series of Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock shall be as set forth below.

“A. One hundred and fifty thousand (150,000) of the authorized shares of Preferred Stock of the Corporation, none of which have been issued or are outstanding, are hereby designated “Series A Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock” (the “Series A Preferred Stock”).

B. The rights, preferences, privileges, restrictions and otheraudit, audit fees, auditor independence matters, relating to the Series A Preferred Stock are as follows:

1.Dividend Rights. The holders of outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of any assets at the time legally

B-4


available therefor, a dividend at the rate of 3% of the Original Issue Price per share per annum, payable in preference and priority to any payment of any dividend on Common Stock of the Corporation. If, in any twelve month period, the Board of Directors declares dividends on the Common Stock that would exceed the dividends declared on the Series A Preferred Stock in such period determined on a Common Share Equivalent Basis (as defined below), the Board shall declare and pay an equivalent additional dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock so that the total dividends on the Common Stock and the Series A Preferred Stock are on a parity determined on a Common Share Equivalent Basis. Common Share Equivalent Basis shall be determined by comparing the dividend that would have been or will be declared or paid on the number of shares of Common Stock into which the shares of Series A Preferred Stock would have been or will be convertible as of the record date(s) to the dividends which were paid or will be paid on the Common Stock during such twelve month period. The right to receive dividends on shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall not be cumulative, and no right to such dividends shall accrue to holders of Series A Preferred Stock by reason of the fact that dividends on said shares are not declared or paid in any year. The Original Issue Price of the Series A Preferred Stock (as adjusted for any combination, consolidation, share distributions or share dividends with respect to such shares) shall be equal to $1,000 per share.

2.Voting Rights. Except as otherwise provided by law, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall have no voting rights and their consent shall not be required for taking any corporate action.

3.Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up. Subject to any preferential liquidation rights of any series of Preferred Stock as may then be outstanding, in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, either voluntary or involuntary, the entire assets and funds of the Corporation legally available for distribution shall be distributed ratably among the holders of the Common Stock and the Series A Preferred Stock in proportion to, in the case of holders of Common Stock, the number of shares of Common Stock held and, in the case of holders of Series A Preferred Stock, the number of shares of Common Stock into which the shares of Series A Preferred Stock are then convertible.

4.Consolidation, Merger, Exchange, Etc. In case the Corporation shall enter into any consolidation, merger, combination, statutory share exchange or other transaction in which the Common Stock is exchanged for or changed into other shares or securities, money and/or any other property, then in any such case the Series A Preferred Stock shall at the same time be either, at the option of the Corporation, (a) similarly exchanged or changed into preferred shares of the surviving entity providing the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock with (to the extent possible) the same relative rights and preferences as the Series A Preferred Stock or (b) converted into the shares of stock and other securities, money and/or any other property receivable upon or deemed to be held by holders of Common Stock immediately following such consolidation, merger, combination, statutory share exchange or other transaction, and the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled upon such event to receive such amount of securities, money and/or any other property as the shares of the Common Stock of the Corporation into which such shares of Series A Preferred Stock could have been converted immediately prior to such consolidation, merger, combination, statutory share exchange or other transaction would have been entitled.

5. Conversion.

(a) Each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall automatically be converted into such number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock as is determined by dividing the Original Issue Price by the Conversion Price in effect at the time of the conversion upon any sale, pledge, conveyance, hypothecation, assignment or other transfer of such share, whether or not for value, or attempt thereof, by the initial registered holder thereof, other than any such transfer by such holder to a nominee of such holder (without any change in beneficial ownership, as such term is defined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)); provided that any transfer by the initial registered holder to any majority-owned subsidiaryof the initial registered holder shall not give rise to automatic conversion hereunder unless and until such transferee ceases to be a majority-owned subsidiary of the initial registered holder; and further provided that in the event any pledge, conveyance, hypothecation, assignment or other transfer shall not give rise to automatic conversion hereunder, then any subsequent

B-5


transfer or attempt thereof by the holder (other than any such transfer by such holder to a nominee of such holder (without any change in beneficial ownership, as such term is defined under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) shall be subject to automatic conversion upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. The price at which shares of Common Stock shall be deliverable upon conversion shall initially $16.50 with respect to shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Conversion Price”). The initial Conversion Price shall be subject to adjustment as provided below.

(b) The Corporation shall at all times reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, solely for the purpose of effecting the conversion of the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock, such number of its shares of Common Stock as shall from time to time be sufficient to effect the conversion of all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

6.Adjustment of Conversion for Dividend and Distributions.

(a) In the event the Corporation shall at any time after issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock declare or pay any dividend or other distribution on Common Stock, payable in Common Stock or other securities or rights convertible into, or exchangeable for, Common Stock, or effect a subdivision or combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common Stock (by reclassification or otherwise) into a greater or lesser number of Common Stock, then in each such case the number of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock shall be adjusted (the “Adjustment”) by multiplying the number of Common Stock to which the holder was entitled before such event by a fraction, the numerator of which will be the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately after such event, and the denominator of which will be the number of shares of Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to such event.

(b) In the event the Corporation shall at any time after issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, distribute to holders of its Common Stock, other than as part of a dissolution or liquidation or the winding up of its affairs, any shares of its capital stock, any evidence of indebtedness, or other securities or any of its assets (other than Common Stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock), then, in any such case, the Series A Preferred Stock holder shall be entitled to receive, at the same time as such distribution is made to the holders of Common Stock, with respect to each share of Common Stock issuable upon such conversion, the amount of cash or evidence of indebtedness or other securities or assets which such Series A Preferred Stock holder would have been entitled to receive with respect to each such share of Common Stock as a result of the happening of such event had the Series A Preferred Stock holder converted to Common Stock immediately prior to the record date or other date determining the shareholders entitled to participate in such distribution (the “Determination Date”).

7.Minimal Adjustments. No adjustment in the Original Issue Price need be made if such adjustment would result in a change in the Conversion Price of less than $0.01. Any adjustment of less than $0.01 which is not made shall be carried forward and shall be made at the time of and together with any subsequent adjustment which, on a cumulative basis, amounts to an adjustment of $0.01 or more in the Conversion Price.

8.Fractional Shares. In lieu of any fractional shares to which the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock would otherwise be entitled, the Corporation shall pay cash equal to such fraction multiplied by the closing price of one share of the Corporation’s Common Stock on the trading day prior to conversion, if such price is available. If such price is not available, this Corporation shall pay cash forfractional shares equal to such fraction multiplied by the fair market value of one share of Series A Preferred Stock as determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. Whether or not fractional shares are issuable upon such conversion shall be determined on the basis of the total number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock of each holder at the time converting into Common Stock and the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon such aggregate conversion.

9.Vote to Change the Terms of Series A Preferred Stock. The approval of the Board of Directors and the affirmative vote at a meeting duly called by the Board of Directors for such purpose (or

B-6


the written consent without a meeting) of the holders of not less than fifty percent (50%) of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall be required to amend, alter, change or repeal any of the powers, designations, preferences and rights of the Series A Preferred Stock.

10.No Other Rights, Privileges, Etc. Except as specifically set forth herein, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall have no other rights, privileges or preferences with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned each declares under penalty of perjury that the matters set out in the foregoing certificate are true of his own knowledge, and the undersigned have executed this certificate at Cupertino, California as of the 5th day of August, 1997.

/s/ John B. Douglas, III

John B. Douglas, III

Senior Vice President

/s/ Paul D. Carmichael

Paul D. Carmichael

Assistant Secretary

B-7


ANNEX C

APPLE INC. 2014 EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN


APPLE INC.

2014 EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN

SECTION 1.INTRODUCTION.

On November 19, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), the Board adopted this 2014 Employee Stock Plan.

The purpose of the Plan is to promote the long-term success of the Company and the creation of shareholder value by offering Participants the opportunity to share in such long-term success by acquiring a proprietary interest in the Company.

The Plan seeks to achieve this purpose by providing for discretionary long-term incentive Awards in the form of Options (which may be Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options), Stock Appreciation Rights, Stock Grants, Restricted Stock Units and Cash Bonus Awards.

The Plan shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California (except its choice-of-law provisions). Capitalized terms shall have the meaning provided in Section 2 unless otherwise provided in this Plan or any related Award Agreement.

SECTION 2.DEFINITIONS.

(a) “2003 Plan” means the Apple Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Plan as amended from time to time.

(b) “Applicable Laws” means all applicable securities, tax and exchange control laws, rules, regulations and requirements relating to the administration of stock plans, including, but not limited to, all applicable U.S. federal and state laws, the rules and regulations of any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted, and the applicable securities, tax and exchange control laws, rules, regulations or requirements of any foreign country or jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted under the Plan or where Participants reside or provide services, as such laws, rules, regulations and requirements shall be in place from time to time.

(c) “Award” means an Option, SAR, Stock Grant, Restricted Stock Unit or Cash Bonus Award.

(d) “Award Agreement” means any Stock Option Agreement, SAR Agreement, Stock Grant Agreement, Restricted Stock Unit Agreement or any written document that evidences a Cash Bonus Award granted under the Plan. Award Agreements shall consist of either (1) a written award agreement in a form approved by the Committee and executed by the Company by an officer duly authorized to act on its behalf, or (2) an electronic notice of award grant in a form approved by the Committee and recorded by the Company (or its designee) in an electronic recordkeeping system used for the purpose of tracking award grants under the Plan generally, as the Committee may provide and, in each case and if required by the Committee, executed or otherwise electronically accepted by the recipient of the Award in such form and manner as the Committee may require. The Committee may authorize any officer of the Company (other than the particular Award recipient) to execute any or all Award Agreements on behalf of the Company.

(e) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company, as constituted from time to time.

(f) “Cash Bonus Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Plan.

(g) “Cashless Exercise” means, to the extent that a Stock Option Agreement so provides and as permitted by Applicable Laws, a program approved by the Committee in which payment of the aggregate Exercise Price and/or satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding obligations may be made all or in part by delivery (on a form prescribed by the Committee) of an irrevocable direction to a securities broker to sell Shares subject to an Option and to deliver all or part of the sale proceeds to the Company.

C-1


(h) “Code” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations and interpretations promulgated thereunder.

(i) “Committee” has the meaning given to such term in Section 3.

(j) “Common Stock” means the Company’s common stock.

(k) “Company” means Apple Inc., a California corporation.

(l) “Consultant” means an individual who provides bona fide services to the Company, a Parent or a Subsidiary, other than as an Employee or Director.

(m) “Covered Employees” means those persons who the Committee determines are subject to the limitations of Code Section 162(m).

(n) “Director” means a member of the Board.

(o) “Disability” means that the Participant is classified as disabled under the long-term disability policy of the Company or, if no such policy applies, the Participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months; provided, however, that with respect to an Option intended to qualify as an ISO, “Disability” shall mean a “permanent and total disability” within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.

(p) “Employee” means any individual who provides services as an employee of the Company, a Parent or a Subsidiary (including any Director that is also an Employee).

(q) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(r) “Exercise Price” means, in the case of an Option, the amount for which a Share may be purchased upon exercise of such Option, as specified in the applicable Stock Option Agreement. “Exercise Price,” in the case of a SAR, means an amount, as specified in the applicable SAR Agreement, which is subtracted from the Fair Market Value at the time such SAR is exercised in determining the amount payable upon exercise of such SAR.

(s) “Fair Market Value” means, unless otherwise determined or provided by the Committee in the circumstances, the closing price (in regular trading) for a Share on the NASDAQ Stock Market (the “Market”) for the date in question or, if no sales of Common Stock were reported on the Market on that date, the last price (in regular trading) for a Share on the Market for the next preceding day on which sales of Common Stock were reported on the Market. The Committee may, however, provide with respect to one or more Awards that the Fair Market Value shall equal the last price for a Share on the Market on the last trading day preceding the date in question or the average of the high and low trading prices of a Share on the Market for the date in question or the most recent trading day. If the Common Stock is no longer listed or is no longer actively traded on the Market as of the applicable date, the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock shall be the value as reasonably determined by the Committee for purposes of the Award in the circumstances. The Committee also may adopt a different methodology for determining Fair Market Value with respect to one or more Awards if a different methodology is necessary or advisable to secure any intended favorable tax, legal or other treatment for the particular Award(s) (for example, and without limitation, the Committee may provide that Fair Market Value for purposes of one or more Awards will be based on an average of closing prices (or the average of high and low daily trading prices) for a specified period preceding the relevant date).

(t) “Fiscal Year” means the Company’s fiscal year.

(u) “Full-Value Awards” means Awards granted under the Plan other than Options and SARs.

C-2


(v) “Full-Value Award Ratio” means the share-counting ratio applicable to Full-Value Awards as specified in Section 5(b) of the Plan.

(w) “Grant Date” means the date on which the Committee makes the determination to grant an Award or such later date as the Committee may specify in making such determination.

(x) “Incentive Stock Option” or “ISO” means an incentive stock option described in Code Section 422.

(y) “Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Board who is not an Employee.

(z) “Nonstatutory Stock Option” or “NSO” means a stock option that is not an ISO.

(aa) “Option” means an ISO or NSO granted under the Plan entitling the Participant to purchase Shares.

(bb) “Parent” means any corporation or other entity that beneficially owns directly or indirectly a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting stock or voting power. An entity that attains the status of a Parent on a date after the adoption of the Plan shall be considered a Parent commencing as of such date.

(cc) “Participant” means an Employee or Consultant who has been selected by the Committee to receive an Award under the Plan or any individual, estate or other entity that holds an Award.

(dd) “Performance Goals” means one or more objective measurable performance goals established by the Committee with respect to a Performance Period based upon one or more of the following criteria: (i) operating income; (ii) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (iii) earnings; (iv) cash flow; (v) market share; (vi) sales or revenue; (vii) expenses; (viii) cost of goods sold; (ix) profit/loss or profit margin; (x) working capital; (xi) return on equity or assets; (xii) earnings per share; (xiii) total shareholder return; (xiv) price/earnings ratio; (xv) debt or debt-to-equity; (xvi) accounts receivable; (xvii) writeoffs; (xviii) cash; (xix) assets; (xx) liquidity; (xxi) operations; (xxii) intellectual property (e.g., patents); (xxiii) product development; (xxiv) manufacturing, production or inventory; (xxv) mergers and acquisitions or divestitures; (xxvi) individual performance objective; and/or (xxvii) stock price. Any criteria used may be measured, as applicable, (a) in absolute terms, (b) in relative terms (including but not limited to, the passage of time and/or against other companies or financial metrics), (c) on a per share and/or share per capita basis, (d) against the performance of the Company as a whole or against particular entities, segments, operating units or products of the Company and /or (e) on a pre-tax or after tax basis. Awards issued to persons who are not Covered Employees may take into account any other factors deemed appropriate by the Committee.

(ee) “Performance Period” means any period not exceeding 120 months as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion. The Committee may establish different Performance Periods for different Participants, and the Committee may establish concurrent or overlapping Performance Periods.

(ff) “Plan” means this Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan as it may be amended from time to time.

(gg) “Re-Price” or “Re-Pricing” means any of the following actions taken by the Committee: (1) lowering or reducing the Exercise Price of an outstanding Option and/or outstanding SAR, (2) cancelling, exchanging or surrendering any outstanding Option and/or outstanding SAR in exchange for cash or another award for the purpose of repricing the award; and (3) cancelling, exchanging or surrendering any outstanding Option and/or outstanding SAR in exchange for an Option or SAR with an Exercise Price that is less than the Exercise Price of the original award; provided that, in each case, a Re-Pricing (or Re-Price, as the case may be) shall not include (y) any action taken with shareholder approval, and (z) any adjustment of an Option or SAR pursuant to Section 11.

(hh) “Restricted Stock Unit” means a bookkeeping entry representing the equivalent of one Share awarded under the Plan and represents an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company.

C-3


(ii) “Restricted Stock Unit Agreement” means the agreement described in Section 9 evidencing a Restricted Stock Unit Award.

(jj) “SAR Agreement” means the agreement described in Section 7 evidencing a Stock Appreciation Right.

(kk) “SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

(ll) “Section 16 Persons” means those officers, directors or other persons who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

(mm) “Securities Act” means the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

(nn) “Share” means one share of Common Stock.

(oo) “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means a stock appreciation right awarded under the Plan.

(pp) “Stock Grant” means Shares awarded under the Plan pursuant to Section 8.

(qq) “Stock Grant Agreement” means the agreement described in Section 8 evidencing a Stock Grant.

(rr) “Stock Option Agreement” means the agreement described in Section 6 evidencing an Option.

(ss) “Subsidiary” means any corporation or other entity a majority of whose outstanding voting stock or voting power is beneficially owned directly or indirectly by the Company. An entity that attains the status of a Subsidiary on a date after the adoption of the Plan shall be considered a Subsidiary commencing as of such date.

(tt) “10-Percent Stockholder” means an individual who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of outstanding stock of the Company or of its parent corporation or subsidiary corporation (as defined in Sections 424(e) and (f) of the Code). In determining stock ownership, the attribution rules of Code Section 424(d) shall be applied.

(uu) “Termination of Service” means (i) in the case of an Employee, a cessation of the provision of employment-related services by the Employee for the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason, including but not by way of limitation, a termination by resignation, discharge, death, disability, or retirement, but excluding any such termination where there is a simultaneous reemployment by the Company or a Subsidiary and excluding any bona fide and Company (or Subsidiary) approved leave of absence; and (ii) in the case of a Consultant, a cessation of the service relationship (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion) between the Consultant and the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason, including but not by way of limitation, a termination by resignation, discharge, death or disability, but excluding any such termination where there is a simultaneous re-engagement of the Consultant by the Company or a Subsidiary. For purposes of the Plan and any Award, if an entity ceases to be a Subsidiary of the Company, a Termination of Service shall be deemed to have occurred with respect to each Employee and Consultant in respect of such Subsidiary who does not continue as an Employee or Consultant in respect of the Company or another Subsidiary that continues as such after giving effect to the transaction or other event giving rise to the change in status unless the Subsidiary that is sold, spun-off or otherwise divested (or its successor or a direct or indirect parent of such Subsidiary or successor) assumes the Employee’s or Consultant’s Award(s) in connection with such transaction.

SECTION 3.ADMINISTRATION.

(a) Committee Composition. The Board or a Committee appointed by the Board shall administer the Plan. The Committee shall generally have membership composition which enables (i) Awards to Section 16 Persons to qualify as exempt from liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act and (ii) Awards to Covered Employees

C-4


to qualify as performance-based compensation as provided under Code Section 162(m). However, the Board may also appoint one or more separate Committees, each composed of two or more directors of the Company who need not qualify underRule 16b-3 or Code Section 162(m), that may administer the Plan with respect to Participants who are not Section 16 Persons or Covered Employees, respectively, may grant Awards under the Plan to such Participants and may determine all terms of such Awards. Members of any such Committee shall serve for such period of time as the Board may determine and shall be subject to removal by the Board at any time. The Board may also at any time terminate the functions of any Committee and reassume all powers and authority previously delegated to the Committee.

The Board and any Committee appointed to administer the Plan is referred to herein as the “Committee.”

(b) Authority of the Committee. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have the full authority, in its sole discretion, to take any actions it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. Such actions shall include:

(i) selecting Participants who are to receive Awards under the Plan;

(ii) determining the Fair Market Value for purposes of any Award;

(iii) determining the type of and number of securities to be subject to each Award, and the Grant Date, vesting requirements and other features and conditions of such Awards;

(iv) approving the forms of Award Agreements to be used under the Plan;

(v) amending any outstanding Awards;

(vi) accelerating the vesting or extending the post-termination exercise term of Awards at any time and under such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate (including, without limitation, in connection with a termination of employment or services or other events of a personal nature) subject to any required consent under Section 15;

(vii) construing and interpreting the Plan and any agreements defining the rights and obligations of the Company, its Subsidiaries, and Participants under the Plan;

(viii) correcting any defect, supplying any omission or reconciling any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award Agreement;

(ix) adopting such rules or guidelines as it deems appropriate to implement the Plan;

(x) authorizing any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effect the grant of an Award previously authorized by the Committee;

(xi) adjusting the number of Shares subject to any Award, adjusting the price of any or all outstanding Awards or otherwise changing previously imposed terms and conditions, in such circumstances as the Committee may deem appropriate, in each case subject to Sections 5 and 15, and subject to the noRe-Pricing provision below;

(xii) determining whether,independent auditors, and the extent to which adjustments are required pursuantthe independent registered public accounting firm may be retained to Section 13 hereofperform non-audit services.

Apple maintains an auditor independence policy that, among other things, prohibits Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm from performing non-financial consulting services, such as information technology consulting and authorizinginternal audit services. This policy mandates that the termination, conversion, substitution or succession of Awards uponAudit and Finance Committee approve in advance the occurrence of an eventaudit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm and the related budget, and that the Audit and Finance Committee be provided with quarterly reporting on actual spending. This policy also mandates that Apple may not enter into engagements with Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm for non-audit services without the express pre-approval of the type described in Section 13;Audit and Finance Committee.

(xiii) acquiring or settling (subjectThe Audit and Finance Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended September 24, 2016 with Apple’s management and Ernst & Young, Apple’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit and Finance Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young the matters required to Sections 13be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

The Audit and 15) rights under Awards in cash, stockFinance Committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young required by applicable requirements of equivalent value, or other consideration, subjectthe PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young’s communications with the Audit and Finance Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young its independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit and Finance Committee recommended to the no Re-Pricing provision below;Board that the financial statements referred to above be included in Apple’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 24, 2016 for filing with the SEC.

Members of the Audit and Finance Committee

Ron Sugar (Chair) | James Bell | Art Levinson | Sue Wagner

 

C-5Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 67


(xiv) making all other decisions relatingSecurity Ownership of

Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table shows certain information as of December 30, 2016 (the “Table Date”), unless otherwise indicated, with respect to the operationbeneficial ownership of Apple’s common stock by: (i) each person Apple believes beneficially holds more than 5% of the Plan;outstanding shares of Apple’s common stock based solely on Apple’s review of SEC filings; (ii) each director and

(xv) adopting such plans or subplans nominee; (iii) each named executive officer listed in the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table—2016, 2015, and 2014” under the section entitled “Executive Compensation”; and (iv) all directors and executive officers as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to comply with the laws of other countries, allow for tax-preferred treatment of Awards or otherwise provide for the participation by Participants who reside outsidea group. As of the U.S.

In no event shall the Committee Re-Price any Option or SAR.

The Committee’s determinations under the Plan shall be finalTable Date, 5,257,816,000 shares of Apple’s common stock were issued and binding onoutstanding. Unless otherwise indicated, all persons.

(c) Indemnification. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable laws, each memberpersons named as beneficial owners of the Committee shall be indemnifiedApple’s common stock have sole voting power and held harmless by the Company against and from (i) any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connectionsole investment power with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Plan or any Award Agreement, and (ii) from any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with the Company’s approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such claim, action, suit, or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, by contract, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or under any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

(d) Reliance on Experts. In making any determination or in taking or not taking any action under the Plan, the Committee may obtain and may rely upon the advice of experts, including employees and professional advisorsrespect to the Company. No director, officer or agent of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries shall be liable for any such action or determination taken or made or omitted in good faith.

SECTION 4.GENERAL.

(a) General Eligibility. Only Employees and Consultants shall be eligible to participate in the Plan. Non-Employee Directors are not eligible for Award grants under the Plan.

(b) Incentive Stock Options. Only Participants who are Employees of the Company, a “parent corporation” of the Company (within the meaning of Section 424(e) of the Code) or a “subsidiary corporation” of the Company (within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code) shall be eligible for the grant of ISOs.shares indicated as beneficially owned. In addition, a 10-Percent Stockholder shall not be eligibleunless otherwise indicated, the address for the grant of an ISO unless the requirements set forth in Code Section 422(c)(5) are satisfied.

(c) Restrictions on Transfer.

(i) Unless otherwise expressly provided in (or pursuant to) this Section 4(c) or required by Applicable Law: (A) all Awards are non-transferable and shall not be subject in any manner to sale, transfer, anticipation, alienation, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or charge; (B) Awards shall be exercised only by the Participant; and (C) amounts payable or Shares issuable pursuant to any Award shall be delivered only to (or for the account of) the Participant.

(ii) The Committee may permit Awards to be exercised by and paid to, or otherwise transferred to, other persons or entities pursuant to such conditions and procedures, including limitations on subsequent transfers, as the Committee may, in its sole discretion, establish in writing. Any permitted transfer shall be subject to compliance with Applicable Laws and shall not be for value (other than nominal consideration, settlement of marital property rights, or for interests in an entity in which more than 50% of the voting interests are held by the Participant or by the Participant’s family members).

C-6


(iii) The exercise and transfer restrictions in Section 4(c) shall not apply to:each person named below is c/o Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California 95014.

 

(A)transfers to the Company (for example, in connection with the expiration or termination
Name of the Award),Beneficial Owner

Shares of Common Stock

Beneficially Owned(1)

Percent of

Common Stock

Outstanding

The Vanguard Group322,968,066(2)6.14%
BlackRock, Inc.315,425,945(3)6.00%
Angela Ahrendts95,042(4)        *
James Bell4,118(5)        *
Tim Cook1,039,809(6)        *
Eddy Cue1,464(7)        *
Al Gore721,353(8)        *
Bob Iger47,225(9)        *
Andrea Jung128,773(10)        *
Art Levinson1,397,257(11)        *
Luca Maestri4,432(12)        *
Dan Riccio10,942(13)        *
Bruce Sewell235,793(14)        *
Ron Sugar19,939(15)        *
Sue Wagner10,034(16)        *
All current executive officers and directors as a group (17 persons)4,399,147(17)        *

 

 (B)(1)

Represents shares of Apple’s common stock held, options held that were exercisable at the designationTable Date or within 60 days thereafter, and RSUs held that will vest within 60 days after the Table Date. Does not include RSUs that vest more than 60 days after the Table Date. RSUs are awards granted by Apple and payable, subject to vesting requirements, in shares of Apple’s common stock.

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 68


(2)

Represents shares of Apple’s common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2015, based on a beneficiarySchedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 2016, by The Vanguard Group. In such filing, The Vanguard Group lists its address as 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355, and indicates that it has sole voting power with respect to receive benefits in the event10,477,437 shares of the Participant’s death or, if the Participant has died, transfersApple’s common stock, shared voting power with respect to or exercise by the Participant’s beneficiary, or, in the absence571,100 shares of a validly designated beneficiary, transfers by will or the lawsApple’s common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 311,845,773 shares of descentApple’s common stock, and distribution,shared dispositive power with respect to 11,122,293 shares of Apple’s common stock.

 

 (C)(3)subject

Represents shares of Apple’s common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2015, based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 25, 2016, by BlackRock, Inc. In such filing, BlackRock, Inc. lists its address as 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055, and indicates that it has sole voting power with respect to any applicable limitations on ISOs, transfers264,930,614 shares of Apple’s common stock, shared voting power with respect to a family member (or former family member) pursuant44,794 shares of Apple’s common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to a domestic relations order if approved or ratified by the Company,315,381,151 shares of Apple’s common stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to 44,794 shares of Apple common stock.

 

 (D)(4)if

Excludes 659,303 unvested RSUs held by Ms. Ahrendts that are not scheduled to vest within 60 days after the Participant has suffered a Disability, permitted transfers or exercises on behalf of the participant by his or her legal representative, orTable Date.

 

 (E)(5)

Includes 2,580 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Bell that are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2017.

(6)

Represents 1,039,809 shares of Apple’s common stock held in the authorizationname of Mr. Cook’s trust and excludes 3,500,000 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Cook that are not scheduled to vest within 60 days after the CommitteeTable Date.

(7)

Represents 1,464 shares of Cashless Exercise procedures with third parties who provide financing forApple’s common stock held in the purposename of (or who otherwise facilitate)Mr. Cue’s trust and excludes 620,803 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Cue that are not scheduled to vest within 60 days after the Table Date.

(8)

Includes 275,779 shares of Apple’s common stock that Mr. Gore has the right to acquire by exercise of Awards consistent with Applicable Lawsstock options and 2,580 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Gore that are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2017.

(9)

Includes 525 shares of Apple’s common stock held by Mr. Iger’s spouse, and 2,580 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Iger that are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2017.

(10)

Includes 109,590 shares of Apple’s common stock that Ms. Jung has the express authorizationright to acquire by exercise of stock options and 2,580 unvested RSUs held by Ms. Jung that are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2017.

(11)

Includes 14,000 shares of Apple’s common stock held by Dr. Levinson’s spouse, 247,394 shares of Apple’s common stock that Dr. Levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 2,580 unvested RSUs held by Dr. Levinson that are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2017.

(12)

Excludes 592,237 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Maestri that are not scheduled to vest within 60 days after the Table Date.

(13)

Excludes 620,803 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Riccio that are not scheduled to vest within 60 days after the Table Date.

(14)

Excludes 620,803 unvested RSUs held by Mr. Sewell that are not scheduled to vest within 60 days after the Table Date.

(15)

Includes 2,580 unvested RSUs held by Dr. Sugar that are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2017.

(16)

Includes 1,800 shares of Apple’s common stock held by Ms. Wagner’s spouse and 2,580 unvested RSUs held by Ms. Wagner that are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2017.

(17)

Includes 632,763 shares of Apple’s common stock that executive officers and directors have the right to acquire by exercise of stock options and 18,060 unvested RSUs that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after the Table Date. Excludes 8,704,803 unvested RSUs held by executive officers that are not scheduled to vest within 60 days after the Table Date.

*

Represents less than 1% of the Committee.issued and outstanding shares of Apple’s common stock as of the Table Date.

(d) Beneficiaries. If permitted by the Committee in the Award Agreement, a Participant under the Plan may name a beneficiary or beneficiaries to whom any vested but unpaid Award shall be paid in the event

Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 69


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Participant’s death. EachExchange Act requires Apple’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of Apple’s equity securities, to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such designation shall revokeownership with the SEC. Officers, directors, and greater than 10% shareholders also are required by SEC rules to furnish Apple with copies of all prior beneficiary designations by the Participant and shall be effective only if given inSection 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon a form and manner acceptable to the Committee. In the absence of any such designation, any vested benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant’s death shall be paid to the Participant’s estate and, subject to the termsreview of the Plancopies of such forms furnished to Apple, and of the applicable Award Agreement, any unexercised vested Award may be exercised by the administrator or executor of the Participant’s estate.

(e) No Rights as a Shareholder. A Participant, or a transferee of a Participant, shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any Common Stock covered by an Award until such person has satisfied all of the terms and conditions to receive such Common Stock, has satisfied any applicable withholding or tax obligations relating to the Award and the Shares have been issued (as evidenced by an appropriate entry on the books of the Company or a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company).

(f) Termination of Service. The Committee shall establish the effect of a Termination of Service on the rights and benefits under each Award under the Plan and in so doing may make distinctions based upon, inter alia, the cause of termination and type of Award.

(g) Consideration. The purchase price for any Award granted under the Plan or the Common Stock to be delivered pursuant to an award, as applicable, may be paid by means of any lawful consideration as determined by the Committee.

SECTION 5.SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN AND SHARE LIMITS.

(a) Basic Limitation. The stock issuable under the Plan shall be authorized but unissued Shares. The aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Awards under the Plan, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 11, is equal to:

(i) 55,000,000 Shares, plus

(ii) the number of any Shares that remain available under the 2003 Plan for new award grants on the date the Company’s shareholders approve the Plan (the “Approval Date”), and determined immediately before giving effect to the termination of the authority to grant new awards under the 2003 Plan in connection with such approval, plus

C-7


(iii) the number of any Shares subject to stock options granted under the 2003 Plan and outstanding as of the Approval Date which expire, or for any reason are cancelled or terminated, after the Approval Date without being exercised, plus

(iv) the number of any Shares subject to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2003 Plan that are outstanding and unvested on the Approval Date that are forfeited, terminated, cancelled or otherwise reacquired by the Company after the Approval Date without having become vested or that are exchanged by a Participant or withheld by the Company or one of its Subsidiaries after the Approval Date to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to the award (in each case, with any such Shares increasing the Shares available for issuance under the Plan based on the Full-Value Award Ratio).

provided that in no event shall the Shares available for issuance under the Plan exceed 109,477,027 Shares (which is the sum of (1) the 55,000,000 Shares set forth above, plus (2) the number of Shares available for new award grants under the 2003 Plan on November 11, 2013, plus (3) the aggregate number of Shares subject to stock options previously granted and outstanding under the 2003 Plan as of November 11, 2013, plus (4) two (2) (the Full-Value Award Ratio) times the aggregate number of Shares subject to restricted stock and restricted stock units previously granted and outstanding under the 2003 Plan as of November 11, 2013).

(b) Share Count. Shares issued pursuant to Awards under the Plan other than Options or SARs will count against the Shares available for issuance under the Plan as two (2) Shares for every one (1) Share issued in connection with the Award. Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of Options or SARs under the Plan will count against the Shares available for issuance under the Plan as one (1) Share for every one Share to which such exercise relates. For purposes of clarity, the total number of Shares subject to SARs that are exercised and settled in Shares, and the total number of Shares subject to Options that are exercised, shall be counted in full on a one-for-one basis against the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan, regardless of the number of Shares actually issued upon settlement of the SARs or Options. If Awards are settled in cash, the Shares that would have been delivered had there been no cash settlement shall not be counted against the Shares available for issuance under the Plan. Except as provided in the next sentence, Shares that are subject to Awards that are forfeited, are terminated, fail to vest or for any other reason are not paid or delivered, shall again become available for Awards under the Plan; provided that any one (1) Share issued pursuant to a Stock Grant or subject to a Restricted Stock Unit Award (including Shares subject to stock-settled dividend equivalent rights) that is forfeited or terminated shall be credited as two (2) Shares when determining the number of Shares that shall again become available for Awards under the Plan if upon grant, the Shares underlying such forfeited or terminated Awards were counted as two (2) Shares against the Plan reserve. Shares that are exchanged by a Participant or withheld by the Company as full or partial payment in connection with any Option or SAR, as well as any Shares exchanged by a Participant or withheld by the Company or one of its Subsidiaries to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any Option or SAR, shall not be available for subsequent Awards under the Plan. Shares that are exchanged by a Participant or withheld by the Company as full or partial payment in connection with any Full-Value Award, as well as any Shares exchanged by a Participant or withheld by the Company or one of its Subsidiaries to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any Full-Value Award, shall be available for subsequent Awards under the Plan; provided that any one (1) Share so exchanged or withheld in connection with any Full-Value Award shall be credited as two (2) Shares when determining the number of Shares that shall again become available for Awards under the Plan if upon grant, the Shares underlying the related Full-Value Award were counted as two (2) Shares against the Plan reserve. Refer to Section 15(i) for application of the foregoing share limits with respect to substituted awards.

(c) Share Limits

(i) Limits on Options and SARs. No Participant shall receive Options or SARs during any Fiscal Year covering, in the aggregate, in excess of 1,000,000 Shares, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 11.

C-8


(ii) Limits on Stock Grants and Restricted Stock Units. No Participant shall receive Stock Grants or Restricted Stock Units during any Fiscal Year covering, in the aggregate, in excess of 1,000,000 Shares (for this purpose, counting such Shares on a 1-for-1 basis), subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 11.

(d) Reservation of Shares; No Fractional Shares. The Company shall at all times reserve a number of Shares sufficient to cover the Company’s obligations and contingent obligations to deliver Shares with respect to Awards then outstanding under the Plan (exclusive of (i) any Awards payable in cash and (ii) any dividend equivalent obligations to the extent the Company has the right to settle such rights in cash). No fractional Shares shall be delivered under the Plan. The Committee may pay cash in lieu of any fractional Shares in settlements of Awards under the Plan.

SECTION 6.TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS.

(a) Stock Option Agreement. Each Option granted under the Plan shall be evidenced and governed exclusively by a Stock Option Agreement between the Participant and the Company. Such Option shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions that are not inconsistent with the Plan and that the Committee deems appropriate for inclusion in a Stock Option Agreement. Dividend equivalent rights shall not be awarded on Options. The provisions of the various Stock Option Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be identical. The Stock Option Agreement shall specify whether the Option is an ISO or an NSO.

(b) Number of Shares. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the number of Shares that are subject to the Option, which number is subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11.

(c) Exercise Price. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the Option’s Exercise Price which shall be established by the Committee and is subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11. The Exercise Price of an Option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value (110% for an ISO granted to a 10-Percent Stockholder) on the Grant Date.

(d) Exercisability and Term. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the date when all or any installment of the Option is to become exercisable and/or any performance conditions or Performance Goals pursuant to Section 10 that must be satisfied before the Option may be exercised. The Stock Option Agreement shall also specify the maximum term of the Option; provided that the maximum term of an Option shall in no event exceed seven (7) yearswritten representations from the Grant Date. A Stock Option Agreement may provide for accelerated vesting in the event of the Participant’s death, Disability, retirement or other circumstancesreporting persons, Apple believes that the Committee may determine to be appropriate and may provide for tolling of vesting in the event of a Participant’s leave of absence. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or the Stock Option Agreement, no Option can be exercised after the expiration date provided in the applicable Stock Option Agreement.

(e) Method of Exercise. An Option may be exercised, in whole or in part, by giving written notice of exercise to the Company or the Company’s designee (or, subject to Applicable Laws and if the Company permits, by electronic or voice methods) of the number of Shares to be purchased. Such notice shall be accompanied by payment in full of the aggregate Exercise Price, plus any required withholdings (unless satisfactory arrangements have been made to satisfy such withholdings). The Company reserves the right to delay issuance of the Shares until the such payment obligations are fully satisfied.

(f) Payment for Option Shares. The Exercise Price of an Option shall be paid in cash at the time of exercise, except as follows and if so provided for in the applicable Stock Option Agreement:

(i) Cashless Exercise. Payment of all or a part of the Exercise Price may be made through Cashless Exercise.

(ii) Other Forms of Payment. Payment may be made in any other form that is consistent with Applicable Laws, regulations and rules and approved by the Committee.

C-9


In the case of an ISO granted under the Plan, except to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, payment shall be made only pursuant to the express provisions of the applicable Stock Option Agreement. In the case of an NSO granted under the Plan, the Committee may, in its discretion at any time, accept payment in any form(s) described in this Section 6(f).

SECTION 7.TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS.

(a) SAR Agreement. Each SAR granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by a SAR Agreement between the Participant and the Company. Such SAR shall be subject to all applicable terms of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms that are not inconsistent with the Plan. A SAR Agreement may provide for a maximum limit on the amount of any payout notwithstanding the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the SAR. Dividend equivalent rights shall not be awarded on SARs. The provisions of the various SAR Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be identical.

(b) Number of Shares. Each SAR Agreement shall specify the number of Shares to which the SAR pertains, which number is subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11.

(c) Exercise Price. Each SAR Agreement shall specify the Exercise Price, which is subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11. A SAR Agreement may specify an Exercise Price that varies in accordance with a predetermined formula while the SAR is outstanding, provided that in all cases the Exercise Price of a SAR shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value on the Grant Date.

(d) Exercisability and Term. Each SAR Agreement shall specify the date when all or any installment of the SAR is to become exercisable and/or any performance conditions or Performance Goals pursuant to Section 10 that must be satisfied before the SAR is exercised. The SAR Agreement shall also specify the maximum term of the SAR which shall not exceed seven (7) years from the Grant Date. A SAR Agreement may provide for accelerated vesting in the event of the Participant’s death, Disability, retirement or other circumstances the Committee may determine to be appropriate and may provide for tolling of vesting in the event of a Participant’s leave of absence. SARs may be awarded in combination with Options or Stock Grants, and such an Award shall provide that the SARs will not be exercisable unless the related Options or Stock Grants are forfeited. A SAR may be included in an ISO only at the time of grant but may be included in an NSO at the time of grant or at any subsequent time. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or the SAR Agreement, no SAR can be exercised after the expiration date provided in the applicable SAR Agreement.

(e) Exercise of SARs. Upon exercise of a SAR, the Participant (or any person having the right to exercise the SAR after Participant’s death) shall receive from the Company (i) Shares, (ii) cash or (iii) any combination of Shares and cash, as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant of the SAR, in its sole discretion. The amount of cash and/or the Fair Market Value of Shares received upon exercise of SARs shall, in the aggregate, be equal to the amount by which the Fair Market Value (on the date of exercise) of the Shares subject to the SARs exceeds the Exercise Price of the Shares.

SECTION 8.TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR STOCK GRANTS.

(a) Time, Amount and Form of Awards. Awards under this Section 8 may be granted in the form of a Stock Grant.

(b) Stock Grant Agreement. Each Stock Grant awarded under the Plan shall be evidenced and governed exclusively by a Stock Grant Agreement between the Participant and the Company. Each Stock Grant shall be subject to all applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions that are not inconsistent with the Plan that the Committee deems appropriate for inclusion in the applicable Stock Grant Agreement. The provisions of the Stock Grant Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be identical.

C-10


(c) Number of Shares. Each Stock Grant Agreement shall specify the number of Shares to which the Stock Grant pertains, which number is subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11.

(d) Vesting Conditions. The Committee shall determine the vesting schedule of each Stock Grant. Vesting shall occur, in full or in installments, upon satisfaction of the conditions specified in the Stock Grant Agreement, which may include performance conditions or Performance Goals pursuant to Section 10.

(e) Voting and Dividend Rights. The holder of a Stock Grant awarded under the Plan shall have the same voting, dividend and other rights as the Company’s other shareholders, except as otherwise stated in the Stock Grant Agreement; provided, however, that any dividends as to the portion of a Stock Grant that is subject to performance-based vesting16(a) filing requirements will be subject to forfeiture and termination (or repayment, as applicable) to the same extent as the corresponding portion of the Stock Grant to which such dividends relate. A Stock Grant Agreement may require that the holder of such Stock Grant invest any cash dividends received in additional Shares subject to the Stock Grant. Such additional Shares and any Shares received as a dividend pursuant to the Stock Grant shall be subject to the same conditions and restrictions as the Stock Grant with respect to which the dividends were paid.

SECTION 9.TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS.

(a) Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Each Restricted Stock Unit granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between the Participant and the Company. Such Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to all applicable terms of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms that are not inconsistent with the Plan. The provisions of the various Restricted Stock Unit Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be identical.

(b) Number of Shares. Each Restricted Stock Unit Agreement shall specify the number of Restricted Stock Units to which the Restricted Stock Unit Award pertains, which number is subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11.

(c) Vesting Conditions. The Committee shall determine the vesting schedule of each Restricted Stock Unit Award. Vesting shall occur, in full or in installments, upon satisfaction of the conditions specified in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, which may include performance conditions or Performance Goals pursuant to Section 10.

(d) Form and Time of Settlement of Restricted Stock Units. Settlement of vested Restricted Stock Units may be made in the form of (i) cash, (ii) Shares or (iii) any combination of both, as determined by the Committee at the time of the grant of the Restricted Stock Units, in its sole discretion. Vested Restricted Stock Units may be settled in a lump sum or in installments. The distribution may occur or commence when the vesting conditions applicable to the Restricted Stock Units have been satisfied or have lapsed, or, if the Committee so provides in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, it may be deferred, in accordance with Applicable Laws, to any later date. The amount of a deferred distribution may be increased by an interest factor or by dividend equivalents, as determined by the CommitteeApple’s directors and provided in the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.

(e) Voting and Dividend Rights. The holders of Restricted Stock Units shall have no voting rights. Prior to settlement or forfeiture, any Restricted Stock Unit awarded under the Plan may, at the Committee’s discretion, carry with it a right to dividend equivalents. Such right entitles the holder to be credited with an amount equal to all cash dividends paidofficers were timely met during 2016, except that one Form 4 was filed for Chris Kondo on one Share while the Restricted Stock Unit is outstanding. Dividend equivalents may be converted into additional Restricted Stock Units and may (and will, to the extent required below) be made subject to the same conditions and restrictions as the Restricted Stock Units to which they attach. Settlement of dividend equivalents may be made in the form of cash, in the form of Shares, or in a combination of both. Dividend equivalents as to Restricted Stock Units that are subject to performance-based vesting requirements will be subject to forfeiture and termination to the same extent as the corresponding Restricted Stock Units to which the dividend equivalents relate.

C-11


(f) Creditors’ Rights. A holder of Restricted Stock Units shall have no rights other than those of a general creditor of the Company. Restricted Stock Units represent an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.

SECTION 10.PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS; CASH BONUS AWARDS.

(a) General. The Committee may, in its discretion, include performance conditions in an Award. If performance conditions are included in Awards to Covered Employees and such Awards are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m), then such Awards will be subject to the achievement of Performance Goals with respect to a Performance Period established by the Committee. Such Awards shall be granted and administered pursuant to the requirements of Code Section 162(m). The Committee may provide at the time it establishes the applicable Performance Goals for the Performance Goals (or performance against the Performance Goals, as the case may be) to be adjusted to mitigate the unbudgeted impact of material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting changes or other events specified by the the Committee. Before any Shares underlying an Award or any Award payments are released to a Covered Employee with respect to a Performance Period, the Committee shall certify in writing that the Performance Goals for such Performance Period have been satisfied. Awards with performance conditions that are granted to Participants who are not Covered Employees need not comply with the requirements of Code Section 162(m).

(b) Cash Bonus Awards. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Cash Bonus Awards under the Plan to one or more Employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. Cash Bonus Awards may be subject to performance conditions as described in Section 10(a) above and, to the extent such Cash Bonus Awards are granted to Covered Persons and intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m), shall be subject to the requirements of Section 162(m), including without limitation, the establishment of Performance Goals and certification of performance by the Committee as set forth above. In addition, the aggregate amount of compensation to be paid to any one participant in respect of all Cash Bonus Awards payable only in cash (and exclusive of Restricted Stock Unit awards settled in cash based on the fair market value of a Share in connection with the payment of the Award, which Awards are subject to the limit of Section 5(c)(ii), and exclusive of cash-settled SARs which are subject to the limit of Section 5.2(c)(i)) and granted to that Participant in any one calendar year shall not exceed $10,000,000. Awards that are cancelled during the year shall be counted against this limit to the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code.

(c) Expiration of Grant Authority. As required pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the Committee’s authority to grant new Awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code (other than Options and SARs with an Exercise Price that is not less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Grant Date) shall terminate upon the first meeting of the Company’s shareholders that occurs in 2019.

SECTION 11.PROTECTION AGAINST DILUTION.

(a) Adjustments. Subject to Section 12, upon (or, as may be necessary to effect the adjustment, immediately prior to): any reclassification, recapitalization, stock split (including a stock split in the form of a stock dividend) or reverse stock split; any merger, combination, consolidation, or other reorganization; any spin-off, split-up, or similar extraordinary dividend distribution in respect of the Common Stock; or any exchange of Common Stock or other securities of the Company, or any similar, unusual or extraordinary corporate transaction in respect of the Common Stock; then the Committee shall equitably and proportionately adjust (1) the number and type of Shares (or other securities) that thereafter may be made the subject of Awards (including the specific Share limits, maximums and numbers of Shares set forth elsewhere in the Plan), (2) the number, amount and type of Shares (or other securities or property) subject to any outstanding Awards, (3) the grant, purchase, or Exercise Price of any outstanding Awards, and/or (4) the securities, cash or other property deliverable upon exercise or payment of any outstanding Awards, in each case to the extent necessary to preserve (but not increase) the level of incentives intended by the Plan and the then-outstanding Awards.

C-12


Unless otherwise expressly provided in the applicable Award Agreement, upon (or, as may be necessary to effect the adjustment, immediately prior to) any event or transaction described in the preceding paragraph or a sale of all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company as an entirety, the Company shall equitably and proportionately adjust the Performance Goals applicable to any then-outstanding performance-based Awards to the extent necessary to preserve (but not increase) the level of incentives intended by the Plan and the then-outstanding performance-based Awards.

It is intended that, if possible, any adjustments contemplated by the preceding two paragraphs be made in a manner that satisfies applicable legal, tax (including, without limitation and as applicable in the circumstances, Section 424 of the Code, Section 409A of the Code and Section 162(m) of the Code) and accounting (so as to not trigger any charge to earnings with respect to such adjustment) requirements.

Without limiting the generality of Section 3, any good faith determination by the Committee as to whether an adjustment is required in the circumstances pursuant to this Section 11(a), and the extent and nature of any such adjustment, shall be conclusive and binding on all persons.

(b) Participant Rights. Except as provided in this Section 11, a Participant shall have no rights by reason of any issue by the Company of stock of any class or securities convertible into stock of any class, any subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any stock dividend or any other increase or decrease in the number of shares of stock of any class. If by reason of an adjustment pursuant to this Section 11 a Participant’s Award covers additional or different shares of stock or securities, then such additional or different shares and the Award in respect thereof shall be subject to all of the terms, conditions and restrictions which were applicable to the Award and the Shares subject to the Award prior to such adjustment.

SECTION 12.CORPORATE TRANSACTIONS.

Upon the occurrence of any of the following: any merger, combination, consolidation, or other reorganization in which the Company does not survive (or does not survive as a public company in respect of its Common Stock); any exchange of Common Stock or other securities of the Company in which the Company does not survive (or does not survive as a public company in respect of its Common Stock; a sale of all or substantially all the business, stock or assets of the Company; a dissolution of the Company; or any other event in which the Company does not survive (or does not survive as a public company in respect of its Common Stock); then the Committee may make provision for a cash payment in settlement of, or for the assumption, substitution or exchange of any or all outstanding Share-based Awards or the cash, securities or property deliverable to the holder of any or all outstanding Share-based Awards, based upon, to the extent relevant under the circumstances, the distribution or consideration payable to holders of the Common Stock upon or in respect of such event. Upon the occurrence of any event described in the preceding sentence, then, unless the Committee has made a provision for the substitution, assumption, exchange or other continuation or settlement of the Award or the Award would otherwise continue in accordance with its terms in the circumstances, each Award shall terminate upon the related event; provided that the holder of an Option or SAR shall be given reasonable advance notice of the impending termination and a reasonable opportunity to exercise his or her outstanding vested Options and SARs in accordance with their terms before the termination of such Awards (except that in no case shall more than ten days’ notice of the impending termination be required).

The Committee may adopt such valuation methodologies for outstanding Awards as it deems reasonable in the event of a cash or property settlement and, in the case of Options, SARs or similar rights, but without limitation on other methodologies, may base such settlement solely upon the excess if any of the per share amount payable upon or in respect of such event over the Exercise Price of the Award.

In any of the events referred to in this Section 12, the Committee may take such action contemplated by this Section 12 prior to such event (as opposed to on the occurrence of such event) to the extent that the Committee deems the action necessary to permit the Participant to realize the benefits intended to be conveyedAugust 5, 2016 with respect to the underlying Shares.disposition of 9,829 shares of Apple’s common stock on August 2, 2016.

 

C-13Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 70


Without limiting the generalityEquity Compensation Plan Information

The following table shows information, as of Section 3, any good faith determinationSeptember 24, 2016, concerning shares of Apple’s common stock authorized for issuance under Apple’s equity compensation plans. As of September 24, 2016, other than as described below, no equity securities were authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans not approved by the Committee pursuant to its authority under this Section 12 shall be conclusive and binding on all persons.shareholders.

SECTION 13.LIMITATIONS ON RIGHTS.

Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and  Rights

(a)

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(1)(2)

($)(b)

Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans

(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders(3)100,011,348(4)17.41434,520,714(5)

(a) Participant Rights. A Participant’s rights, if any, in respect of or in connection with any Award are derived solely from the discretionary decision of the Company to permit the individual to participate in the Plan and to benefit from a discretionary Award. By accepting an Award under the Plan, a Participant expressly acknowledges that there is no obligation on the part of the Company to continue the Plan and/or grant any additional Awards. Any Award granted hereunder is not intended to be compensation of a continuing or recurring nature, or part of a Participant’s normal or expected compensation, and in no way represents any portion of a Participant’s salary, compensation, or other remuneration for purposes of pension benefits, severance, redundancy, resignation or any other purpose.

(1)

The weighted-average exercise price is calculated based solely on the exercise prices of the outstanding stock options and does not reflect the shares that will be issued upon the vesting of outstanding awards of RSUs, which have no exercise price.

Neither the Plan nor any Award granted under the Plan shall be deemed to give any individual a right to remain an Employee, Consultant or director of the Company, a Parent, or any Subsidiary. The Company and its Parent and Subsidiaries reserve the right to terminate the service of any person at any time, and for any reason, subject to applicable laws, the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and any applicable written employment agreement (if any), and such terminated person shall be deemed irrevocably to have waived any claim to damages or specific performance for breach of contract or dismissal, compensation for loss of office, tort or otherwise with respect to the Plan or any outstanding Award that is forfeited and/or is terminated by its terms or to any future Award.

(2)

The weighted-average remaining contractual term of Apple’s outstanding stock options as of September 24, 2016 was 3.7 years.

(b) Shareholders’ Rights. Except as provided in Section 8(e), a Participant shall have no dividend rights, voting rights or other rights as a shareholder with respect to any Shares covered by his or her Award prior to the issuance of such Shares (as evidenced by an appropriate entry on the books of the Company or a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). No adjustment shall be made for cash dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date when such Shares are issued, except as expressly provided in Sections 8(e), 9(e) and 11.

(3)

This table does not include equity awards that have been assumed by Apple in connection with the acquisition of other companies. As of September 24, 2016, an additional 142,900 shares of Apple’s common stock were subject to outstanding stock options assumed in connection with acquisitions of other companies (with a weighted-average exercise price of $5.95 per share). Shares issued in respect of these assumed awards do not count against the share limits of the 2014 Plan.

(c) Regulatory Requirements. Any other provision of the Plan notwithstanding, the obligation of the Company to issue Shares or other securities under the Plan shall be subject to all Applicable Laws and such approval by any regulatory body as may be required. The Company reserves the right to restrict, in whole or in part, the delivery of Shares or other securities pursuant to any Award prior to the satisfaction of all legal requirements relating to the issuance of such Shares or other securities, to their registration, qualification or listing or to an exemption from registration, qualification or listing. The person acquiring any securities under the Plan will, if requested by the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, provide such assurances and representations to the Company or one of its Subsidiaries as the Committee may deem necessary or desirable to assure compliance with all applicable legal and accounting requirements.

(4)

This number includes the following: 76,308,442 shares subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2014 Plan, of which 263,214 shares were subject to outstanding stock options and 76,045,228 shares were subject to outstanding RSU awards; 23,052,083 shares subject to outstanding awards granted under the Apple Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Plan, of which 26,731 shares were subject to outstanding stock options and 23,025,352 shares were subject to outstanding RSU awards; and 650,823 shares subject to outstanding awards granted under the Director Plan, of which 632,763 shares were subject to outstanding stock options and 18,060 shares were subject to outstanding RSU awards.

SECTION 14.WITHHOLDING TAXES.

(5)

This number includes 386,365,390 shares available for issuance under the 2014 Plan, 47,026,765 shares reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 1,128,559 shares available for issuance under the Director Plan. Shares issued in respect of awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2014 Plan and the Director Plan count against the shares available for grant under the applicable plan as two shares for every share granted.

(a) General. A Participant shall make arrangements satisfactory to the Company for the satisfaction of any withholding tax obligations that arise in connection with his or her Award. The Company shall have the right to deduct from any amount payable under the Plan, including delivery of Shares to be made pursuant to an Award granted under the Plan, all federal, state, city, local or foreign taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to such payment and the Company may take any such actions as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for the payment of such taxes. The Company shall not be required to issue any Shares or make any cash payment under the Plan until such obligations are satisfied.

(b) Share Withholding. The Committee may (i) permit or require a Participant to satisfy all or part of his or her withholding or income tax obligations by having the Company withhold all or a portion of any Shares thatDated: January 6, 2017

 

C-14Apple Inc. | 2017 Proxy Statement | 71


otherwise would be issued to him or her, or (ii) permit a Participant to satisfy such obligations by Cashless Exercise or by surrendering all or a portion of any Shares that he or she previously acquired; provided that Shares withheld or previously owned Shares that are tendered shall not exceed the amount necessary to satisfy the Company’s tax withholding obligations at the minimum statutory withholding rates, including, but not limited to, U.S. federal and state income taxes, payroll taxes and foreign taxes, if applicable, unless the previously owned Shares have been held for a minimum duration (if any) determined satisfactory as established by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion. Any payment of taxes by assigning Shares to the Company may be subject to restrictions, including, but not limited to, any restrictions required by rules of the SEC. If any Shares are used to satisfy withholding taxes, such Shares shall be valued based on the Fair Market Value thereof on the date when the withholding for taxes is required to be made.

SECTION 15.DURATION AND AMENDMENTS; MISCELLANEOUS.

(a) Term of the Plan. The Plan shall terminate on the day before the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date and may be terminated on any earlier date pursuant to this Section 15.

(b) Amendment or Termination of the Plan. The Board may, at any time, terminate or, from time to time, amend, modify or suspend the Plan, in whole or in part. No awards may be granted during any period that the Board suspends the Plan. To the extent then required by Applicable Laws or required under Sections 162, 422 or 424 of the Code to preserve the intended tax consequences of the Plan, or deemed necessary or advisable by the Board, any amendment to the Plan shall be subject to shareholder approval.

(c) Amendments to Awards. Without limiting any other express authority of the Committee under (but subject to) the express limits of the Plan, the Committee by agreement or resolution may waive conditions of or limitations on Awards to Participants that the Committee in the prior exercise of its discretion has imposed, without the consent of a Participant, and (subject to the requirements of Sections 3 and 15(d)) may make other changes to the terms and conditions of Awards. No amendment of an Award shall constitute a Re-Pricing without shareholder approval.

(d) Limitations on Amendments to Plan and Awards. No amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan or amendment of any outstanding Award Agreement shall, without written consent of the Participant, affect in any manner materially adverse to the Participant any rights or benefits of the Participant or obligations of the Company under any Award granted under the Plan prior to the effective date of such change. Changes, settlements and other actions contemplated by Section 11 shall not be deemed to constitute changes or amendments for purposes of this Section 15.

(e) Governing Law. The Plan shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California (except its choice-of-law provisions) and applicable U.S. Federal Laws.

(f) Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction holds any provision invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Plan shall continue in effect.

(g) Section Headings. Captions and headings are given to the sections and subsections of the Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings shall not be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction or interpretation of the Plan or any provision thereof.

(h) No Corporate Action Restriction. The existence of the Plan, the Award Agreements and the Awards granted hereunder shall not limit, affect or restrict in any way the right or power of the Board or the shareholders of the Company to make or authorize: (i) any adjustment, recapitalization, reorganization or other change in the capital structure or business of the Company or any Subsidiary, (ii) any merger, amalgamation, consolidation or change in the ownership of the Company or any Subsidiary, (iii) any issue of bonds, debentures, capital, preferred or prior preference stock ahead of or affecting the capital stock (or the rights thereof) of the Company

C-15


or any Subsidiary, (iv) any dissolution or liquidation of the Company or any Subsidiary, (v) any sale or transfer of all or any part of the assets or business of the Company or any Subsidiary, or (vi) any other corporate act or proceeding by the Company or any Subsidiary. No Participant, beneficiary or any other person shall have any claim under any Award or Award Agreement against any member of the Board or the Committee, or the Company or any Employees, officers or agents of the Company or any Subsidiary, as a result of any such action.

(i) Stock-Based Awards in Substitution for Stock Options or Awards Granted by Other Company. Awards may be granted under the Plan in substitution for or in connection with an assumption of employee, director and/or consultant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or other stock-based awards granted by other entities to persons who are or who will become Employees or Consultants in respect of the Company or one of its Subsidiaries in connection with a distribution, merger or other reorganization by or with the granting entity or an affiliated entity, or the acquisition by the Company or one of its Subsidiaries, directly or indirectly, of all or a substantial part of the stock or assets of the granting entity. The Awards so granted may reflect the original terms of the related award being assumed or substituted for and need not comply with other specific terms of the Plan, with Common Stock substituted for the securities covered by the original award and with the number of Shares subject to such awards, as well as any exercise or purchase prices applicable to such awards, adjusted to account for differences in stock prices in connection with the transaction. Any shares that are delivered and any Awards that are granted by, or become obligations of, the Company, as a result of any such assumption or substitution in connection with any such transaction shall not be counted against the Share limit or other limits on the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan, unless determined otherwise by the Company.

(j) An Award granted under the Plan will be subject to any provisions of Applicable Laws providing for the recoupment or clawback of incentive compensation; the terms of any Company recoupment, clawback or similar policy in effect at the time of grant of the Award; and any recoupment, clawback or similar provisions that may be included in the applicable Award Agreement.

C-16


Directions to the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

LOGO

 

FROM SAN JOSE:

LOGO
 FROM SAN FRANCISCO:

Take Interstate 280 northbound.

Take 280 southbound.
Take the(south from San Francisco, north from San Jose)

Exit at De Anza Blvd. exit.

Take the De Anza Blvd. exit.
Make a leftBoulevard

Turn south onto De Anza Blvd. (at signal).

Make a right onto De Anza Blvd. (at signal).
Make aBoulevard toward Cupertino

Turn left onto Mariani Avenue.

Make a left ontoAvenue

Continue on Mariani, Avenue.

Enter Infinite Loop Parking Lot atwhich leads into the end of Mariani Avenue.Enter Infinite Loop Parking Lot at the end of Mariani Avenue.
Apple parking lot

Proceed to Building 4 (to Apple Town Hall).

Proceed to Building 4 (to Apple Town Hall).Hall (Building 4)

Attendance at the 2014 annual meeting of shareholdersAnnual Meeting is limited to shareholders. Admission to the Annual Meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. In the interest of saving time and money, Apple Inc. has opted to provide the Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended September 28, 201324, 2016 in lieu of producing a glossy annual report.

 

LOGO

APPLE INC.

 

LOGOLOGO  LOGO


LOGO

LOGO


LOGO

 

Apple Inc.


C123456789
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
000004

ENDORSEMENT_LINE
ENDORSEMENT LINE SACKPACK


000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
MR A SAMPLE


DESIGNATION (IF ANY)


ADD 1


ADD 2


ADD 3


ADD 4


ADD 5


ADD 6

C123456789

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext


Electronic Voting Instructions

You can vote by Internet or telephone! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!


Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.


VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.


Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on February 28, 2014.

2017.
Vote by Internet


Log on to the Internet and go to
www.investorvote.com/AAPL


Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.


Vote by telephone


Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada any time on a touch tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call.


Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.


Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X


Apple Inc. Annual Shareholder Meeting Proxy Card
1234 5678 9012 345


IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.


A Proposals — Proposals—The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the listed nominees, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.

1 YEAR for Proposal 4.
1. ElectionThe election to Apple’s Board of Directors:

For Withhold

For Withhold

For Withhold +

01 - William Campbell

02 - Timothy Cook

03 - Millard Drexler

04 - Al Gore

05 - Robert Iger

06 - Andrea Jung

07 - Arthur Levinson

08 - Ronald Sugar

Directors of the eight nominees named in the Proxy Statement
For Against Abstain

2. The amendment of the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles”) to facilitate the implementation of majority voting for the election of directors in an uncontested election by eliminating Article VII, which relates to the term of directors and the transition from a classified board of directors to a declassified structure

For Against Abstain

3. The amendment of the Articles to eliminate the “blank check” authority of the Board to issue preferred stock

For Against Abstain

4. The amendment of the Articles to establish a par value for the Company’s common stock of $0.00001 per share

5.
01 - JAMES BELL
04 - BOB IGER
07 - RON SUGAR
02 - TIM COOK
05 - ANDREA JUNG
08 - SUE WAGNER
03 - AL GORE
06 - ART LEVINSON
For Against Abstain
2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’sApple’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014

6. A non-binding advisory resolution2017
For Against Abstain
3. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation

7. The approval
1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain
4. Advisory vote on the frequency of the Apple Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Plan

shareholder votes on executive compensation
B Shareholder Proposals — Proposals—The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Proposals 5, 6, 7, 8 9, 10 and 11.

9.
For Against Abstain

8. A proposal by John Harrington and Northstar Asset Management Inc. entitled “Board Committee on Human Rights” to amend the Company’s bylaws


For Against Abstain


5. A shareholder proposal entitled “Charitable Giving - Recipients, Intents and Benefits”
6. A shareholder proposal regarding diversity among our senior management and board of directors
7. A shareholder proposal entitled “Shareholder Proxy Access Amendments”
8. A shareholder proposal entitled “Executive Compensation Reform”
9. A shareholder proposal by The National Center for Public Policy Research of a non-binding advisory resolution entitled “Report on Company Membership and Involvement with Certain Trade Associations and Business Organizations”

10. A proposal by Carl Icahn of a non-binding advisory resolution that the Company commit“Executives to completing not less than $50 billion of share repurchases during its 2014 fiscal year (and increase the authorization under its capital return program accordingly)

11. A proposal by James McRitchie of a non-binding advisory resolution entitled “Proxy Access for Shareholders”

Retain Significant Stock”
IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - D ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.


C 1234567890 J N T


1 U P X 2 9 9 1 6 8 1
MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE


140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND


MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND


MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

+

1 U P X 1 7 9 2 9 2 1

01QUPE


LOGOLOGO

 

Apple Inc.

2014
2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders


February 28, 2014

2017
9:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time


1 Infinite Loop, Building 4,Town Hall (Building 4), Cupertino, California 95014


Upon arrival, please present your photo identification at the registration desk.

Directions:

FROM SAN JOSE:


Directions to the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Take Interstate 280 northbound.

Take the(south from San Francisco, north from San Jose) Exit at De Anza Blvd. exit.

Make a leftBoulevard
Turn south onto De Anza Blvd. (at signal).

Make aBoulevard toward Cupertino
Turn left onto Mariani Avenue.

Enter Infinite Loop Parking Lot atAvenue
Continue on Mariani, which leads into the end of Mariani Avenue.

Apple parking lot
Proceed to Building 4 (to Apple Town Hall).

FROM SAN FRANCISCO:

Take 280 southbound.

Take the De Anza Blvd. exit.

Make a right onto De Anza Blvd. (at signal).

Make a left onto Mariani Avenue.

Enter Infinite Loop Parking Lot at the end of Mariani Avenue.

Proceed to Building 4 (to Apple Town Hall).

280N San Francisco

85N Mountain View

85

N

Hollenbeck

280

Stelling

De Anza

Mc Clellan

85S Campbell

Homestead

Stevens Creek

Wolfe

APPLE TOWN HALL

280S San Jose

Hall (Building 4) for meeting registration
Attendance at the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is limited to shareholders. Admission to the meeting will be on a first-come, first-servedfirst- served basis. In the interest of saving time and money, Apple Inc. has opted to provide the enclosed Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 201324, 2016 in lieu of producing a glossy annual report.


. IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.


THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF APPLE INC.
FOR THE 20142017 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 28, 2014 +

2017
The undersigned shareholder of Apple Inc., a California corporation, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement with respect to the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Apple Inc. to be held at 1 Infinite Loop, Building 4,Town Hall (Building 4), Cupertino, California 95014 on Friday,Tuesday, February 28, 20142017 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, and hereby appoints Peter OppenheimerLuca Maestri and Bruce Sewell, and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, each with power of substitution and revocation, and each with all powers that the undersigned would possess if personally present, to vote the Apple Inc. common stock of the undersigned at such meeting and any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) of such meeting, as set forth on the reverse side, and in their discretion upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting (and any such postponement(s) or adjournment(s)).


THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED OR, IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES, FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, 1 YEAR FOR PROPOSAL 4, AGAINST PROPOSALS 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 7, AND AGAINST PROPOSALS 8, 9, 10 AND 11, AND AS SAID PROXIES DEEM ADVISABLE ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING AND ANY POSTPONEMENT(S) OR ADJOURNMENT(S) THEREOF.


PLEASE VOTE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE OR VOTE THROUGH THEBY TELEPHONE OR BY THE INTERNET.


If you vote by telephone or the Internet, please DO NOT mail back this proxy card. THANK YOU FOR YOUR VOTE.


C Non-Voting Items


Change of Address - Please print new address below.


Consent
Until contrary notice to Apple Inc., I consent to access all future notices of annual meetings, proxy statements and annual reports issued by Apple Inc. over the Internet.

I Consent


D Authorized Signatures - This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below


NOTE: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate officer, please provide your FULL title.


Date (mm/dd/yyyy) - Please print date below.


Signature 1 - Please keep signature within the box.


Signature 2 - Please keep signature within the box.


IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - D ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. +